Recommended Posts

CHICAGO (AP) -- A Chicago restaurant has cooked up a controversial burger of the month for October, garnishing it with an unconsecrated communion wafer and a red wine reduction sauce.

Kuma's Corner, a foodie destination with just a few tables, names its hamburgers after heavy metal bands. For October, the restaurant chose to name the burger after the Swedish band Ghost. Members of the band dress in religious robes and wear skeleton face makeup.

It's in poor taste, said Jeff Young of New Orleans who runs the blog Catholic Foodie.

"It's not, for us, the Eucharist," Young said. "However this wafer is a symbol. There's a cross on it. It's like taking a flag and burning a flag."

Luke Tobias, Kuma's Corner director of operations, said the restaurant never wanted to offend anyone. He said reaction has been a "mixed bag," but more positive than negative.

"There are people who are offended by it, but we're delighted to see that generally people seem to have a sense of humor," Tobias said.

The restaurant, which often plays loud heavy metal music, is a fan of Ghost, Tobias said. Young said he realizes that and knows Kuma's Corner didn't intentionally want to make anyone mad.

"The Ghost" burger is selling well, Tobias said, because customers are curious about it.

"Hopefully people will have a good time with it ? that's certainly what we're trying to do," Tobias said.

source

post-37120-0-93595300-1380928545.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1180487-unholy-chicago-burger/
Share on other sites

Im confused as to how a communal wafer on the burger is like burning a flag? Is it because the cross will be eaten? Is that not what you do with Communal Wafers anyway?

 

It's the implication I think.  The restaurant is trivializing one of biggest and most important symbols of Catholicism by putting it on a burger.  It's not the Eucharist because it's not blessed by a priest but it's still a symbol for it.

 

That being said, that burger looks and sounds delicious :D  The place also happens to be directly on the way to my brother's place from where I am, so if I happen to end up in Chicago this month, I'll be getting one.

Looks does not have anything to do with taste. A burger with mozarella and red wine sauce? That sounds delicious indeed.

 

It could have the best flavours in the universe, but if it looks like ######, I'm not eating it! :p

 

Food is about more than just the taste, y'know. ;)

It could have the best flavours in the universe, but if it looks like ****, I'm not eating it! :p

 

Food is about more than just the taste, y'know. ;)

Ok, in fine cuisine I get your point, but my native food or Indian food isn't exactly the best looking, but taste........

You can get anything you like, from the mildest to completely blow your head off hot,

Ok, in fine cuisine I get your point, but my native food or Indian food isn't exactly the best looking, but taste........

You can get anything you like, from the mildest to completely blow your head off hot,

 

I'm very much an amateur chef, so I like to make food that tastes great but also looks good too.  I can even make a bowl of stew look great. :p  To me, though that burger might taste great, no effort at all has gone into making it look edible, and that's just lazy.

 

Of course, it -could- just be a dreadful photo...

 

Not a fan of curry though... I have little tolerance for hot spices, unfortunately. :(

  • Like 1

 

 

Food is about more than just the taste, y'know. ;)

 

I agree, it's about functionality (nutrition) too.

 

I have nothing against food that looks good, but I will never understand such... privileged point of views like yours. Maybe because we cant have such luxuries in the third world.

I agree, it's about functionality (nutrition) too.

 

I have nothing against food that looks good, but I will never understand such... privileged point of views like yours. Maybe because we cant have such luxuries in the third world.

I understand what you're saying, but that was a little harsh dude, (just saying)

I understand what you're saying, but that was a little harsh dude, (just saying)

 

How so? I'm not insulting him. Or at least it's not my intent. Many first world citizens are indeed privileged. That's not a lie nor a secret.

I agree, it's about functionality (nutrition) too.

 

I have nothing against food that looks good, but I will never understand such... privileged point of views like yours. Maybe because we cant have such luxuries in the third world.

 

It's not privileged at all, I take exception to that comment.  My financial situation is such that I'm forced to often buy cheap products that don't even come close to luxury quality.  It just needs a little time and effort and you can turn the cheapest ingredients into a tasty, good looking, and healthy meal.

 

People are just too damned lazy to go to the effort involved.

It's not privileged at all, I take exception to that comment.  My financial situation is such that I'm forced to often buy cheap products that don't even come close to luxury quality.  It just needs a little time and effort and you can turn the cheapest ingredients into a taste, good looking, and healthy meal.

 

People are just too damned lazy to go to the effort involved.

 

Such effort is not pragmatic.

How so? I'm not insulting him. Or at least it's not my intent. Many first world citizens are indeed privileged. That's not a lie nor a secret.

no, I don't know how to explain it, maybe condescending might have been a better word to use, I like many, although do like in the UK am considered, living on the 'poverty line' as the government would call it, (and yes, am currently unemployed, but that is a whole other matter) my parents are from India, and I've been back a few times, and the situation there isn't much better than the one I'm in here, the cost of living here alone is extortionate, but it's home.

Such effort is not pragmatic.

 

Bwuh?  I think you mean practical, there.   Also, rubbish! All you need is a little time and the will to make some effort. Many things can be prepared ahead of time and then frozen for later (something I do a lot).

 

Not that there's anything particularly wrong with eating "sloppy Joe's".  I just prefer to go to the effort to make it look presentable, too.

no, I don't know how to explain it, maybe condescending might have been a better word to use, I like many, although do like in the UK am considered, living on the 'poverty line' as the government would call it, (and yes, am currently unemployed, but that is a whole other matter) my parents are from India, and I've been back a few times, and the situation there isn't much better than the one I'm in here, the cost of living here alone is extortionate, but it's home.

 

I agree it was condescending. I admit I have no patience for existential first world problems. I hate memes with illogical passion, however I find myself enjoying the first world meme because it synthesizes my views.

Bwuh?  I think you mean practical, there.   Also, rubbish! All you need is a little time and the will to make some effort. Many things can be prepared ahead of time and then frozen for later (something I do a lot).

 

Not that there's anything particularly wrong with eating "sloppy Joe's".  I just prefer to go to the effort to make it look presentable, too.

 

No, I meant pragmatic

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatism

I agree it was condescending. I admit I have no patience for existential first world problems. I hate memes with illogical passion, however I find myself enjoying the first world meme because it synthesizes my views.

 

Personally, I dislike the "first world, third world" labels.  I find them quite insulting, to be frank.

 

The presentation of food is not a problem, it's a form of expression, an art form.  A competent artist can work with the cheapest ingredients and produce something wonderful.  The article in this thread is about food from a restaurant, therefore the presentation of the food should be paramount.

Personally, I dislike the "first world, third world" labels.  I find them quite insulting, to be frank.

 

The presentation of food is not a problem, it's a form of expression, an art form.  A competent artist can work with the cheapest ingredients and produce something wonderful.  The article in this thread is about food from a restaurant, therefore the presentation of the food should be paramount.

 

And yet they are selling well, like many restaurants who dont suffer OCD with food aesthetics.

And yet they are selling well, like many restaurants who dont suffer OCD with food aesthetics.

 

Not everyone cares that what they're eating looks like ****.

 

Giving a damn about what your food looks like is not OCD, quit being so bloody condescending.

No, because, again, plate aesthetics are not pragmatic.

Not everyone cares that what they're eating looks like ****.

 

Giving a damn about what your food looks like is not OCD, quit being so bloody condescending.

please buddies, lets not turn this into a fight
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!