Recommended Posts

CHICAGO (AP) -- A Chicago restaurant has cooked up a controversial burger of the month for October, garnishing it with an unconsecrated communion wafer and a red wine reduction sauce.

Kuma's Corner, a foodie destination with just a few tables, names its hamburgers after heavy metal bands. For October, the restaurant chose to name the burger after the Swedish band Ghost. Members of the band dress in religious robes and wear skeleton face makeup.

It's in poor taste, said Jeff Young of New Orleans who runs the blog Catholic Foodie.

"It's not, for us, the Eucharist," Young said. "However this wafer is a symbol. There's a cross on it. It's like taking a flag and burning a flag."

Luke Tobias, Kuma's Corner director of operations, said the restaurant never wanted to offend anyone. He said reaction has been a "mixed bag," but more positive than negative.

"There are people who are offended by it, but we're delighted to see that generally people seem to have a sense of humor," Tobias said.

The restaurant, which often plays loud heavy metal music, is a fan of Ghost, Tobias said. Young said he realizes that and knows Kuma's Corner didn't intentionally want to make anyone mad.

"The Ghost" burger is selling well, Tobias said, because customers are curious about it.

"Hopefully people will have a good time with it ? that's certainly what we're trying to do," Tobias said.

source

post-37120-0-93595300-1380928545.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1180487-unholy-chicago-burger/
Share on other sites

Im confused as to how a communal wafer on the burger is like burning a flag? Is it because the cross will be eaten? Is that not what you do with Communal Wafers anyway?

 

It's the implication I think.  The restaurant is trivializing one of biggest and most important symbols of Catholicism by putting it on a burger.  It's not the Eucharist because it's not blessed by a priest but it's still a symbol for it.

 

That being said, that burger looks and sounds delicious :D  The place also happens to be directly on the way to my brother's place from where I am, so if I happen to end up in Chicago this month, I'll be getting one.

Looks does not have anything to do with taste. A burger with mozarella and red wine sauce? That sounds delicious indeed.

 

It could have the best flavours in the universe, but if it looks like ######, I'm not eating it! :p

 

Food is about more than just the taste, y'know. ;)

It could have the best flavours in the universe, but if it looks like ****, I'm not eating it! :p

 

Food is about more than just the taste, y'know. ;)

Ok, in fine cuisine I get your point, but my native food or Indian food isn't exactly the best looking, but taste........

You can get anything you like, from the mildest to completely blow your head off hot,

Ok, in fine cuisine I get your point, but my native food or Indian food isn't exactly the best looking, but taste........

You can get anything you like, from the mildest to completely blow your head off hot,

 

I'm very much an amateur chef, so I like to make food that tastes great but also looks good too.  I can even make a bowl of stew look great. :p  To me, though that burger might taste great, no effort at all has gone into making it look edible, and that's just lazy.

 

Of course, it -could- just be a dreadful photo...

 

Not a fan of curry though... I have little tolerance for hot spices, unfortunately. :(

  • Like 1

 

 

Food is about more than just the taste, y'know. ;)

 

I agree, it's about functionality (nutrition) too.

 

I have nothing against food that looks good, but I will never understand such... privileged point of views like yours. Maybe because we cant have such luxuries in the third world.

I agree, it's about functionality (nutrition) too.

 

I have nothing against food that looks good, but I will never understand such... privileged point of views like yours. Maybe because we cant have such luxuries in the third world.

I understand what you're saying, but that was a little harsh dude, (just saying)

I understand what you're saying, but that was a little harsh dude, (just saying)

 

How so? I'm not insulting him. Or at least it's not my intent. Many first world citizens are indeed privileged. That's not a lie nor a secret.

I agree, it's about functionality (nutrition) too.

 

I have nothing against food that looks good, but I will never understand such... privileged point of views like yours. Maybe because we cant have such luxuries in the third world.

 

It's not privileged at all, I take exception to that comment.  My financial situation is such that I'm forced to often buy cheap products that don't even come close to luxury quality.  It just needs a little time and effort and you can turn the cheapest ingredients into a tasty, good looking, and healthy meal.

 

People are just too damned lazy to go to the effort involved.

It's not privileged at all, I take exception to that comment.  My financial situation is such that I'm forced to often buy cheap products that don't even come close to luxury quality.  It just needs a little time and effort and you can turn the cheapest ingredients into a taste, good looking, and healthy meal.

 

People are just too damned lazy to go to the effort involved.

 

Such effort is not pragmatic.

How so? I'm not insulting him. Or at least it's not my intent. Many first world citizens are indeed privileged. That's not a lie nor a secret.

no, I don't know how to explain it, maybe condescending might have been a better word to use, I like many, although do like in the UK am considered, living on the 'poverty line' as the government would call it, (and yes, am currently unemployed, but that is a whole other matter) my parents are from India, and I've been back a few times, and the situation there isn't much better than the one I'm in here, the cost of living here alone is extortionate, but it's home.

Such effort is not pragmatic.

 

Bwuh?  I think you mean practical, there.   Also, rubbish! All you need is a little time and the will to make some effort. Many things can be prepared ahead of time and then frozen for later (something I do a lot).

 

Not that there's anything particularly wrong with eating "sloppy Joe's".  I just prefer to go to the effort to make it look presentable, too.

no, I don't know how to explain it, maybe condescending might have been a better word to use, I like many, although do like in the UK am considered, living on the 'poverty line' as the government would call it, (and yes, am currently unemployed, but that is a whole other matter) my parents are from India, and I've been back a few times, and the situation there isn't much better than the one I'm in here, the cost of living here alone is extortionate, but it's home.

 

I agree it was condescending. I admit I have no patience for existential first world problems. I hate memes with illogical passion, however I find myself enjoying the first world meme because it synthesizes my views.

Bwuh?  I think you mean practical, there.   Also, rubbish! All you need is a little time and the will to make some effort. Many things can be prepared ahead of time and then frozen for later (something I do a lot).

 

Not that there's anything particularly wrong with eating "sloppy Joe's".  I just prefer to go to the effort to make it look presentable, too.

 

No, I meant pragmatic

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatism

I agree it was condescending. I admit I have no patience for existential first world problems. I hate memes with illogical passion, however I find myself enjoying the first world meme because it synthesizes my views.

 

Personally, I dislike the "first world, third world" labels.  I find them quite insulting, to be frank.

 

The presentation of food is not a problem, it's a form of expression, an art form.  A competent artist can work with the cheapest ingredients and produce something wonderful.  The article in this thread is about food from a restaurant, therefore the presentation of the food should be paramount.

Personally, I dislike the "first world, third world" labels.  I find them quite insulting, to be frank.

 

The presentation of food is not a problem, it's a form of expression, an art form.  A competent artist can work with the cheapest ingredients and produce something wonderful.  The article in this thread is about food from a restaurant, therefore the presentation of the food should be paramount.

 

And yet they are selling well, like many restaurants who dont suffer OCD with food aesthetics.

And yet they are selling well, like many restaurants who dont suffer OCD with food aesthetics.

 

Not everyone cares that what they're eating looks like ****.

 

Giving a damn about what your food looks like is not OCD, quit being so bloody condescending.

No, because, again, plate aesthetics are not pragmatic.

Not everyone cares that what they're eating looks like ****.

 

Giving a damn about what your food looks like is not OCD, quit being so bloody condescending.

please buddies, lets not turn this into a fight
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!