Microsoft Admits That Third-Party Antivirus Is More Effective Than MSE


Recommended Posts

Microsoft has admitted Windows users should install antivirus above and beyond its own Security Essentials, describing its protection as merely a "baseline" that will "always be on the bottom" of antivirus software rankings.

 

Microsoft launched Security Essentials in 2009, raising complaints from antivirus rivals that such software shouldn't be bundled with Windows for competition reasons.

 

However, the most frequent complaint about Security Essentials is that it's not good enough: it flunked a pair of tests earlier this year - including one from Dennis Technology Labs, a testing firm affiliated with PC Pro's publisher.

 

Now, Microsoft has said it sees Security Essentials as merely the first layer of protection, advising customers to use additional, third-party antivirus - although the company stressed that wasn't because the product wasn't good enough to stand on its own.

 

Well, paid av suites usually update their definitions and such more often so I'm not surprised, some even have excellent firewalls

But I am glad MSE is available as it's still better than nothing

  • Like 6

Too bad most of the 3rd party AV programs crash, (ie:ZA, Avast,Bitdefender, Kaspersky, AVG). You only have to search on sites like the MS Answers site

Sorry, but no they don't, mine has never crashed, neither has anyone else I know physically, and I'm less likely to believe online stats due to bias one way or the other, As it just happens my uncle works for Symantec UK and I've read a few of the satisfaction reports stating which product was serving which user better etc... and 3 of the products in your list are listed as among the better and more reliable products

 

edit.

 

Sorry about my choice of words if you found it offensive, it was not my intention.

Just because it MAYbe better, it doesnt mean it WONT crash. And just because it doesnt crash on your system, it doesnt mean it wont crash on other systems.

 

IMO most of these 3rd party AV programs are hype. And all these companies are after, is money. It really depends WHAT you do online, WHAT you get/download and WHAT you install.

 

If you install anything (and you've got no idea what it is, and /or what it does), then you'll need something. Or don't put it on the internet

wait, didn't most PC-security gurus usually said that you should NOT use anti-virus on top of another?

its like trying to wear 2 rubbers on top of each other. the friction will cause a break,then you will get infected with something pretty nasty.

  • Like 3

Pardon my ignorance but if this was a flat out admission, wouldn't it be across most tech sites by now? I'm also not familiar with the source but I'm not from the UK.

a very closely related story to this was posted here on this site back in January I think along with cnet and a few other sites, front page, but the page became an all out flame war I can't seem to find it, I must have deleted the favourite.

Using MSE from day 1 since it has been released in my office PC, home PC, and Laptop and never had any issue with it, it has never crashed, nor I had any single virus on the PCs. I may agree that it is the basic security suite but it is way more better than third party suites available today.

  • Like 2

Using MSE from day 1 since it has been released in my office PC, home PC, and Laptop and never had any issue with it, it has never crashed, nor I had any single virus on the PCs. I may agree that it is the basic security suite but it is way more better than third party suites available today.

The only thing that Microsoft Security Essentials has going for it is having little to no false positives. Look at any professional AV testing company results. MSE has much lower detection rates. Almost embarrassing low. How is it "way more better than third party suites available today"? There are only a handful of programs that are worse, and they are from companies I have never even heard of.

 

Furthermore, I have done my own AV testing once a year for the past few years. MSE has continued to give poor results. Of course you may say that if you know what you are doing, you will not get infected. I have not been legitimately infected once in my adult life. However, I like knowing that the software I have is going to do the job correctly. Currently, I use avast! because after testing, it had one of the best detection rates and it is also free (I have no need for the options in the professional version). Previous to this I was subscribed to ESET NOD32 for about three years and Avira Premium Antivirus for one. So in the end, I do not mind having a dozen false-positives since it is coupled with a detection rate higher than 98%.

  • Like 1

For the average joe, MSE is all you need. I have MSE on all my systems and never had any issues. Infact I do my banking on my main system with MSE installed and I download trainers for games onto it.  Done this for years.

How is this news?  From the very beginning the entire point was that it was a free antivirus in a day and age where the average idiot person wasn't running any form of antivirus.  It wasn't ever meant to be the best antivirus you could possibly get, it was only meant to be a pretty decent one for people who couldn't afford one.  Now it's built into Windows, and it does a good enough job that I don't feel the need to install a 3rd party antivirus.

  • Like 3
Previously, Microsoft would spend resources trying to improve Security Essentials' performance in tests. "We used to have part of our team directed towards predicting test results and figuring out what might be in someone?s test. There?s always a cost to that," she said. "If they are doing that work they are not looking at those threats that are affecting our customers. We always felt that was wrong. There?s something not right about that ? we?re not doing the best job for our customers."
The company decided to stop that practice and put its effort elsewhere.
 
"We put half of those people on focusing on what we call prevalent threats. We developed this new telemetry to look for emerging threats - sort of an early notification system that new threats were emerging. We had this group of folks start focusing on those threats and we saw that it increased our protection service level for our customers."

 

 

from the same art, basically they are saying that in the past there focus was on improving the test results instead of the actual threats and that they are now focused on protecting you better instead of making it appear so through test that they are protecting you.

Some malware can enter a system through exploits and the user never be any the wiser no matter how much of a security pro they enjoy thinking they are. Even visiting a popular site infected with something that can exploit say java or flash. depending on what it does or it's intend. Botnets are usually bad about sitting there with no activity, then you have ones like Chameleon which steals money from advertisers.

Then you have the people who are easily satisfied with an executable just because someone else said "it's a false positive" So they ignore their AV warnings, not saying some false positives don't exist but I mean c'mon, don't be so gullable, the #1 security for your network is YOU and it's easy to circumvent all fail safes just by saying, it's ok. I would certainly question what code is doing if it sets off any AV alert, like why does *xx* need kernel level access when all it does is user level type stuff.

Many AV's don't acknowledge lesser known malware as it's a cat and mouse game. I had a file on my back up drive for 10 years that has just recently been flagged by most every AV, it belonged to an old game I got from one of those retro sites, I considered it benign but even virustotal set off every scan. So whatever, maybe it's false, maybe AV's just now caught onto the code but better safe than sorry.

 

I'm actually surprised there hasn't been that one poster who says they don't need AV cause they be elite. Usually there is always one at every forum.

I check vb100 tests from time to time, and notice Microsoft Security Essentials has been slipping over time.

https://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/latest_comparative/index

(From the Feb-Aug 2013 Chart)

 

MSE is currently still 90% Reactive Effective, and 80% Proactive Effective. It's very close comparative to Avira Free at the moment.

AVG (Free) is currently showing 95% Reactive Effective, and 75% Proactive Effective.

It looks like Norton, McAfee didn't submit there for Feb-Aug time frame.

 

AV protection effectiveness changes over time.

Right now, F-Secure, Kingsoft, and Optenet are leading from the ones tested.

 

The testing, however does not test how easy / difficult the products are to use or the resources (memory, cpu) they use.

 

I use Security Essentials, very good about how / where I surf, but in the case I suspect something, I use multiple different products / tools to check.

For the average joe, MSE is all you need. I have MSE on all my systems and never had any issues. Infact I do my banking on my main system with MSE installed and I download trainers for games onto it.  Done this for years.

I've found quite the opposite.  I usually install MSE for other people, just because of no nagging to purchase, and I ALWAYS get those machines back to work on later.  A few of them infected so bad, I had to spend several hours on them cleaning up.  I just won't do it anymore.  Not worth the trouble.  I've been going with Avast lately, but have always use Avira for myself.  For paid, I use Kaspersky on main machines.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!