Recommended Posts

Considering the limited funding to Nasa, why can't all countries just depend on each other for further exploration of space as a benefit to the world? I never cared for the us vs them segregation mentality, everyone can benefit more if the world comes together for everything but of course that would unlikely happen due to cultural differences and everyone hates others that are different for no real reason. I just wish every scientist from every part of the world could all share projects and funding to achieve the goals necessary to advance technology and exploration of space. 

Considering the limited funding to Nasa, why can't all countries just depend on each other for further exploration of space as a benefit to the world? I never cared for the us vs them segregation mentality, everyone can benefit more if the world comes together for everything but of course that would unlikely happen due to cultural differences and everyone hates others that are different for no real reason. I just wish every scientist from every part of the world could all share projects and funding to achieve the goals necessary to advance technology and exploration of space. 

 

Not much happens without competition. The reason that NASA got so much funding back in the day was because of the competition with the Russians. 

 

Their really isnt too much that goes on in the world which isn't driven by competition. Microsoft is a prime example.

 

That being said I wish it wasnt so, and the likes of the UN could be in charge and everybody funded it, but how do you get people to pay?

I would think goals like getting humans to Mars or better imaging devices further out in space to see more of it or discovering ET life would be as much of an incentive as competition. No one really cares who got to the moon first nowadays but the fact that humans got there seems to serve the purpose. Only haters seem to care about who is better, smarter or more advanced. What a selfish waste of time. 

 

We sit here in America and complain about racism, about giving equal rights but we're better than those russians right?  Screw China but we'll buy all their products cause we're proud Americans? Same difference to me but studies and research continues each day without direct competition in many cases with the goals of treating diseases or other such advancements, not to say hahaha you other country.

However IF competition is so important then all those conspiracies of UFO crashes must be false because surely we would say hey, we discovered ET's first! 

I think we as a country are too worried about being on top as foreign political influence and fighting power but yet who is really living it up as a result of not having all the baggage that goes with it? They may not have nukes or fancy tanks but they get nicer streets to drive on along with everything else...sheesh  /rant

That? Wasn't that largely Canadian and cancelled as it was besieged with problems the US couldn't fix?

True that, but I posted it in jest. That said, there are working designs similar to it now that are headed for opetational status. Modern composites etc. make a world of difference.

Example; this prototype masses in at 770 kg, carries a 640 kg payload, can do 180 km/h, and has a service ceiling of 3,658 meters. Every year it gets better, with two uses being a medevac drone or for infantry resupply.

True that, but I posted it in jest. That said, there are working designs similar to it now that are headed for opetational status. Modern composites etc. make a world of difference.

Example; this prototype masses in at 770 kg, carries a 640 kg payload, can do 180 km/h, and has a service ceiling of 3,658 meters. Every year it gets better, with two uses being a medevac drone or for infantry resupply.

Further, consider the B-2 Spirit bomber - the original design harkened back to Jack Northrup (yes - the SAME one that founded the larger half of what is now Northrup Grumman) and was originally a prop-driven design; the flyable version of the 1950s (while darn near structurally identical), used jet engines originally developed for the B-58 Hustler bomber.

 

Odd Factoid - What does the B-2 bomber have in common with a bakery?  Oddly enough, both have Northrup Grumman in common - the Grumman half makes commercial truck bodies; specifically, the sliding-on-both-sides truck bodies used in businesses small to extra-large (they are still used in some parts of the world by UPS and FedEx - and were more common with both) - however, they are mostly associated with bakeries (Intercontinental Baking, primarily - yes, the same ones that baked Wonder and Hostess until they went into Chapter 7) hence they are STILL being called "bread trucks" - even when painted Air Force blue or battleship (US Navy) grey.  

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!