Recommended Posts

Has anyone had any luck using wake-on-lan with Apple's Airport Extreme Base Stations? I'm using their latest generation (taller rectangular version released this year) and have got WOL to work while on the LAN, but when remotely trying to wake my PC over the internet using magic packets I cannot seem to get any success.

 

Anyone shed some light on this mystery for me please?

I forwarded upd port 9 to the local IP of the PC. it's of course connected via Ethernet cable. I set up a static local ip as well and still can't get it to wake. there's an option in the airport utility to enabled all connection from WAN. should I enable this or is this to manage devices such as locally connected hard disks remotely?

Heres the thing your forwarding to what mac? Your router needs to know the mac address of of the local IP to be able to forward too it.

Your router needs specific support for WOL to work, you need to be able to create static arp entries or you need to be able to forward to the broadcast address, etc.

For example my router has ability to connect to it remotely and then send wol packets to boxes behind it

post-14624-0-11149100-1384114323.png

post-14624-0-37644200-1384114327.png

I set my static local DHCP leased IP to my MAC address of the PC I want to wake.  It's an Apple router but a custom PC running windows 7 64-bit SP1.  The NIC is setup to accept WOL packets.  I don't know where to look in the router settings for a WOL options.  What's the broadcast IP for my device? It uses an A and B 10 range IP for the device and DCHP leasing. I think the it's out from 10.0.1.1- 10.0.1.200 and it keeps the remaining 55 IP's private.

 

I didn't see anything for WOL in the device. With my prior router I would just SSH into the console and use a -wol command line entry to the device mac address through an app on my phone.  Can I connect to an Airport Extreme router in that same way? Does it use a BusyBox backend? 

 

Don't see options for that in Airport Utility either (the program that seems to interface the device, also designed by Apple)

Its an Apple -- you can not be serious about this "Does it use a BusyBox backend?" ;) heheheeheh

I would assume if your using a /24, ie 255.255.255.0 mask on your 10.0.1.0/24 address then your broadcast address would be 10.0.1.255

If you set a reservation for your machine in the AEBS what did you set for a lease time, I would think once the lease expires it would forget all about the mac.

I don't believe the AEBS, or for that matter most routers will allow you to forward to broadcast address.

Do you not have 1 box you can leave on? Then you can just get to it and then send your WOL from the local lan.. For example cheap pogoplug or raspberry pi would work.

Just use a real router and use your AEBS as an AP ;)

LOL! Love your sense of humour! :) If i didn't have all these Apple wireless devices that just talk to "apple airport" chipset/ firmware flawlessly I would probably have grabbed some newer model openWRT asus router and dropped pfsense on it like yours has.  I was running gargoyle on a tp-link but it was dropping signal with my apple tv/ airport express (for streaming music to speakers) and ipads constantly. This AEBS is definitely what I needed in terms of a strong/ stable connection now to all my apple hardware (minus obvious PC). Range and everything was increased!  However Raspberry Pi, that's super low power consumption yeah?  I essentially didn't want to run my desktop 24/7 with dual SLI setup and overclocked components (that power draw).  But this R-Pi sounds like a good idea!

 

How would I set it up to essentially wake my other system? Just RDP into it? and use what client side to wake the desktop?

 

Thanks for all the help by the way!

What does your gateway to your network have to do with what you use for wireless? If you have apple products that work best with wireless apple, then yeah use your AEBS for wireless.. But use whatever you want as your router, put openwrt on it, dd-wrt. Use a pc or vm and run pfsense, etc.

Your wireless does not, and to be honest shouldn't even be part of your gateway device. Just use your AEBS as wireless Accesspoint, not as your router off your network.

But yeah the pi, uses nothing for power.. just ssh into it, open a forward for ssh to its IP.. Then when you want to wake up your desktop, just ssh to your pi, and send your wol from there to what you want to wake up.

If you want to get fancy with it you could setup a knock so you send a specific packet or hit it on a specific port and it sends a wol packet to your machine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_knocking

if the pi is a bit hard to get a hold of, a pogoplug works as well. You can enable ssh on them, and if need be there is info about running full arch linux on them. Should be able to pick one up anywhere and only around $25 as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!