Recommended Posts

Sweet. Dice has measured performance improvements ranging from 14% to 58% (!) - apparently, this is most beneficial to systems with very fast GPUs under graphically heavy workloads. Can't wait for Kaveri numbers and more benchmarks. http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf4/news/view/bf4-mantle-live/

AMD did share benchmarks, but they're curiously lacking about the 'in between' GPUs (though I've heard they're still working with DICE on the performance of the 270-280x)

 

1080p on Ultra with 4X on Kaveri with a 290X was a 40% improvement.  (They're pretty easy to find on WCCFtech, I'd link if I could.)

1080p on Ultra with 4X on Kaveri with a 290X was a 40% improvement. (They're pretty easy to find on WCCFtech, I'd link if I could.)

Yeah I'll believe it when I see it.

Sorry I'm tired of all these GPU makers claiming ###### FPS improvements (in percentages) in some highly specific situation that you'll never come across 99% of the time.

It's like how Nvidia (and AMD) claims these ridiculous improvements with every new driver release and then you get it and your fps is exactly the same. Hell by now Dirt3 should be running at 700 fps because they claim its a 70% increase every ######ing driver.

 

Sweet. Dice has measured performance improvements ranging from 14% to 58% (!) - apparently, this is most beneficial to systems with very fast GPUs under graphically heavy workloads. Can't wait for Kaveri numbers and more benchmarks. http://battlelog.bat...f4-mantle-live/

AMD did share benchmarks, but they're curiously lacking about the 'in between' GPUs (though I've heard they're still working with DICE on the performance of the 270-280x)

 

1080p on Ultra with 4X on Kaveri with a 290X was a 40% improvement.  (They're pretty easy to find on WCCFtech, I'd link if I could.)

 

 

If this is true this is really good.

 

We have to keep in mind that BF4 mantle is basically a mantle port of the directx version of the game. Also the devs have no experience working with the Mantle api. Had this game been made with Mantle api in mind by experienced Mantle programmers the diff would probably be bigger.

Mantle gave me a HUGE increase in minimum FPS. the FPS dropping down to 40-50 in specific locations on seige of shanghai and hanai resort is completely fixed with the mantle renderer for me. and this is on a 280x which supposedly isn't optimized yet:

 

DX11: http://s22.postimg.org/y0j8o86v3/Screenshot_Win32_0004.png [s12.postimg.org]

 

Mantle: http://s22.postimg.org/qlyi9ladb/Screenshot_Win32_0005.png [s23.postimg.org]

 

That's about double the minimum FPS!. And if you look at the cpu and gpu utilization, mantle is making much fuller utilization of both. there's clearly a cpu bottlebeck in the dx11 renderer, the fps and gpu usage both drop in tandem on seige of shanghai. And look at the lines on the perfoverlay graph, cpu and gpu are much more in sync and with lower rendering times.

 

I've noticed two issues so far:

 

Triple buffering seems broken with the mantle renderer, with vsync enabled fps often drops to exactly half my refresh rate, performing like double buffered vsync. Doesn't happen with the dx11 renderer, and if I switch off vsync in the mantle renderer the drops to 60 fps are gone. I already reported this to amd and repi so I'm sure that will be fixed. I also get some occasional stutters where all the sudden the game just "stops" for a second, and then resumes working perfectly, doesn't happen very often though, and when it does it always seems to be triggered by a jet flying close overhead.

 

So far I've had no crashes or stability issues with it.

 

For an early beta this seems quite good, mantle's potential is definitely there, and the performance advantages are definitely real. I can't wait for more updates to smooth things out :)

specs:

i5-2500

16gb ddr3 1866

amd 280x

win 8.1

  • Like 2

 

Mantle gave me a HUGE increase in minimum FPS. the FPS dropping down to 40-50 in specific locations on seige of shanghai and hanai resort is completely fixed with the mantle renderer for me. and this is on a 280x which supposedly isn't optimized yet:

This is impressive considering:

 

Mantle performance for the AMD Radeon? HD 7000/HD 8000 Series GPUs and AMD Radeon? R9 280X and R9 270X GPUs will be optimized for BattleField 4? in future AMD Catalyst? releases. These products will see limited gains in BattleField 4? and AMD is currently investigating optimizations for them.

http://anandtech.com/show/7729/amd-catalyst-141-beta-drivers-now-available-mantle-frame-pacing-more

Looks like you're in for more happy surprises in the future. I would be jealous but I don't play Battlefield 4.  :p

 

Mantle gave me a HUGE increase in minimum FPS. the FPS dropping down to 40-50 in specific locations on seige of shanghai and hanai resort is completely fixed with the mantle renderer for me. and this is on a 280x which supposedly isn't optimized yet:

 

DX11: http://s22.postimg.org/y0j8o86v3/Screenshot_Win32_0004.png [s12.postimg.org]

 

Mantle: http://s22.postimg.org/qlyi9ladb/Screenshot_Win32_0005.png [s23.postimg.org]

 

That's about double the minimum FPS!. And if you look at the cpu and gpu utilization, mantle is making much fuller utilization of both. there's clearly a cpu bottlebeck in the dx11 renderer, the fps and gpu usage both drop in tandem on seige of shanghai. And look at the lines on the perfoverlay graph, cpu and gpu are much more in sync and with lower rendering times.

 

I've noticed two issues so far:

 

Triple buffering seems broken with the mantle renderer, with vsync enabled fps often drops to exactly half my refresh rate, performing like double buffered vsync. Doesn't happen with the dx11 renderer, and if I switch off vsync in the mantle renderer the drops to 60 fps are gone. I already reported this to amd and repi so I'm sure that will be fixed. I also get some occasional stutters where all the sudden the game just "stops" for a second, and then resumes working perfectly, doesn't happen very often though, and when it does it always seems to be triggered by a jet flying close overhead.

 

So far I've had no crashes or stability issues with it.

 

For an early beta this seems quite good, mantle's potential is definitely there, and the performance advantages are definitely real. I can't wait for more updates to smooth things out :)

specs:

i5-2500

16gb ddr3 1866

amd 280x

win 8.1

 

This is good news the only difference between your setup and mine is I have an i7-3770k

This has also been a great improvement for me. I haven't recorded any actual figures because I can't really be bothered, but it has certainly increased performance, and I'm on a 7950 which hasn't been optimised yet! My CPU is an 15-2400 as well.

  • 2 weeks later...

RIP Mantle

 


For nearly 20 years, DirectX has been the platform used by game developers to create the fastest, most visually impressive games on the planet.

However, you asked us to do more. You asked us to bring you even closer to the metal and to do so on an unparalleled assortment of hardware. You also asked us for better tools so that you can squeeze every last drop of performance out of your PC, tablet, phone and console.
 

Come learn our plans to deliver.

 

http://schedule.gdconf.com/session-id/828184

While it's possible it's not likely to be available this year.  So I'll definitely enjoy Mantle while I wait.

 

On another note, the 14.2 drivers just enabled features, and the Battlefield 4 patch just now cleared up the rest of the issues that bothered people in the Mantle renderer.

  • 3 weeks later...

http://techreport.com/news/26190/crytek-touts-new-cryengine-pledges-mantle-support

RIP Mantle indeed ;)


Crytek has joined the growing list of developers signed on to support AMD's Mantle API. The announcement was made at GDC this afternoon; it says support for the close-to-the-metal programming interface will be added to the latest version of CryEngine. Note the use of the term "will." Mantle apparently hasn't been integrated into the engine yet, and there's no information on when the first CryEngine games will support it.

 

I hope they add support from GCN 1.0 cards soon because I have worse performance with Mantle than DirectX in Thief with a 7850. Their 14.3 driver didn't help matters either since it made Windows hang on the logo screen. I did manage to boot once with "Last Good Configuration" (that's when I tested), but after that, it would always hang no matter what I did, safe mode as well. Had to use a restore from before I installed the driver in the end.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • hands down the worst version of Windows to date and sadly I think it's only downhill from here
    • I've never known a release to have so much pressure than this one. There is so much riding on the whole games industry because of everything that's changed in the past five years. That if this is a complete flop then I think the whole games industry is done unless something radically changes.
    • Windows 11 is now five years old by Taras Buria Windows 11 is now half a decade old. Five years ago, on June 24, 2021, Microsoft announced its latest operating system, designed to "bring you closer to what you love." Today, Windows 11 celebrates its fifth birthday. The launch of Windows 11 was interesting. Rumors about Microsoft introducing a Windows 10 successor popped up weeks before the public announcement, and a few days later, an entire preview build leaked online, allowing everyone to take a peek at what Microsoft was preparing. A few weeks later, Microsoft confirmed that Windows 11 was a thing and officially unveiled its next-gen operating system. Early versions of Windows 11 promised quite a lot. A redesigned, more modern user interface, a brand new Start menu and taskbar, improvements to virtual desktops and window snapping, Android app support, Teams integrated into the taskbar, Windows Widgets, a new version of the Microsoft Store, improved security, and more. Some of those features were welcomed, while others were received with heavy criticism. Besides missing taskbar and Start menu features, many disliked the steep hardware requirements, which kicked out PCs that were back then still perfectly fine. TPM and Secure Boot became mandatory, causing a spike in sales of dedicated TPM chips for motherboards. Double-layered context menus were disliked as well, and it is something that Microsoft still has to fix. Additionally, with time, some of Windows 11's exclusive features were simply killed. Microsoft removed the Teams integration and discontinued Android app support. During the early days of Windows 11, Microsoft was quite unwilling to address things that users criticized most. After four years on the market, management changes, and heated competition from the Mac camp, Microsoft finally decided to give in and take its operating system back to the drawing board to fix everything users had been complaining about for years. Microsoft is now redesigning the Start menu, adding missing taskbar features, improving Windows Update, fixing Windows 11's context menu, and more. Some believe all that warrants a new Windows 12 release, but for now, it appears that Windows 11 will stick around for a while. With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11!
    • It’s a code which will be connected to your account. You can share the box but that would be sort of pointless.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Wavespace earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!