Watercooling for Xbox One/PS4


Recommended Posts

I was thinking, would it be better if the console using a watercooling system instead of fans to keep it cool? I would not think it would be a lot more to do. The size would be bigger but you could get higher spec if they do it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1188461-watercooling-for-xbox-oneps4/
Share on other sites

Hello,

I was thinking, would it be better if the console using a watercooling system instead of fans to keep it cool? I would not think it would be a lot more to do. The size would be bigger but you could get higher spec if they do it.

Servicing it, replacing it, and/or people drinking the water just spells expensive....

Sounds like a recipe for disaster, imagine as the consoles age something would eventually start to leak...

By all accounts the console is almost silent and runs nice and cool as it is.

My understanding was that watercooling was for serious overclockers who dealt with extreme amounts of heat. I doubt that is the case in consoles manufactured to particular specifications. Plus, given the heating issues of the last gen, those two companies should have paid close attention to any heat issues. One company in particular.

This is just trying to find a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. The consoles have been designed to run at max CPU and handle the thermal load produced. I'm also sure they have some type of thermal protection built in, in the event of a fan failure.

My understanding was that watercooling was for serious overclockers who dealt with extreme amounts of heat. I doubt that is the case in consoles manufactured to particular specifications. Plus, given the heating issues of the last gen, those two companies should have paid close attention to any heat issues. One company in particular.

 

Actually watercooling is more about noise than it is overclocking. 

 

you move the heat away from the CPU and cool it with a big silent fan on a big juicy radiator. and fully integrated watercooling systems for the CPU make them extremely safe and easy to install, no chance of leaking, you can literally throw it around like a nunchuck and it won't leak. 

 

as it is though, it just complicates the production of a console and makes it more expensive and complicated to produce and consoles should be produced so they'll be silent anyway. most of them use heat pipes anyway which is less efficient system that works similarly to watercooling allowing you to move the heat to a more central area with a bigger cooling surface and fan. 

I was thinking, would it be better if the console using a watercooling system instead of fans to keep it cool? I would not think it would be a lot more to do. The size would be bigger but you could get higher spec if they do it.

 

The cooling issue is completely overblown. There are laptops with smaller form factors and more power than the current consoles and they cool themselves with tiny fans. 

Here's my problem: Watercooling is great, but NOT for everyone.  And this is where enthusiasts lose the plot - the start solving problems that don't exist to push their chosen solution.

 

The sped/performance of the chips in question is a known variable, and the cooling is (should have been) built around that and so is (should be) perfectly sufficient.

 

Watercooling would push the cost up, it would push up maintenance, it would push up the likelihood of things going wrong.

Actually watercooling is more about noise than it is overclocking. 

 

Since when? Most people doing watercooling are trying to achieve a higher over-clock and don't care about noise, because they are likely running a dual SLI 780 GTX setup, so the CPU fan is the least of their worries.

Since when? Most people doing watercooling are trying to achieve a higher over-clock and don't care about noise, because they are likely running a dual SLI 780 GTX setup, so the CPU fan is the least of their worries.

 

There are actually fans capable of outperforming or at least giving similar performance to the integrated watercooling systems and for cheaper. so all the integrated watercooling systems aren't sold to overclockers but to people who want silent computers. overclockers don't really need watercooling either, but the noise level can be pretty unbearable for a high end overclocked system. then again, overclocking serves little purpose today, for the price of overclocking you can buy an i7. games today don't even use i5's to their capacity and won't for the foreseeable future.  so for the money you spend on overclocking gear you could just buy a faster more stable computer.  the only ones who use i7's to the max, are those who use them for workstations, they need stability not overclocks. 

 

either way the end result is that WC today is generally a noise reduction thing. had you asked 5+ years ago back when watercooling was complicated and required you to put them together yourself. then yes, back then it was an overclocker thing. not so anymore, sure they still use them, but they're outnumbered by those who just want a silent computer today. 

Actually watercooling is more about noise than it is overclocking. 

 

 

 

 

Really? I thought most of the new fans, the expensive ones, were damn-near silent & very effective at cooling in standard or "mildly" over-clocked rigs.

 

 

 

Not my area of expertise, though, so I am happily corrected :)

There are actually fans capable of outperforming or at least giving similar performance to the integrated watercooling systems and for cheaper. so all the integrated watercooling systems aren't sold to overclockers but to people who want silent computers. overclockers don't really need watercooling either, but the noise level can be pretty unbearable for a high end overclocked system. then again, overclocking serves little purpose today, for the price of overclocking you can buy an i7. games today don't even use i5's to their capacity and won't for the foreseeable future.  so for the money you spend on overclocking gear you could just buy a faster more stable computer.  the only ones who use i7's to the max, are those who use them for workstations, they need stability not overclocks. 

 

either way the end result is that WC today is generally a noise reduction thing. had you asked 5+ years ago back when watercooling was complicated and required you to put them together yourself. then yes, back then it was an overclocker thing. not so anymore, sure they still use them, but they're outnumbered by those who just want a silent computer today. 

 

 

About 10 years ago I did watercooling for silence more than anything else - but the performance side is simply physics - water is a lot more efficient at moving heat away from things.  Cheap pre-made WC will give little tangible benefit over some heatsinks but a 'proper' WC system is far better.   I'm still doing it now and really enjoy building them from scratch.

About 10 years ago I did watercooling for silence more than anything else - but the performance side is simply physics - water is a lot more efficient at moving heat away from things.  Cheap pre-made WC will give little tangible benefit over some heatsinks but a 'proper' WC system is far better.   I'm still doing it now and really enjoy building them from scratch.

 

Yes, for moving it away form the CPU it's better. but the heat is still there in the system, in the end you're still using a fan to get it of of the radiator :)

 

Either way, the point is, that for a console, it just ads to much cost and complexity in production, you would easily add another 50-100 to the price. 

Hello,

Servicing it, replacing it, and/or people drinking the water just spells expensive....

 

 

They have closed loop no-fuss,no-maintenance systems for water cooling.  If they have it for the PC, it could be done for the next gen consoles.  The biggest worry for that is the dust accumulation on the rads.

Yes, for moving it away form the CPU it's better. but the heat is still there in the system, in the end you're still using a fan to get it of of the radiator :)

 

Either way, the point is, that for a console, it just ads to much cost and complexity in production, you would easily add another 50-100 to the price. 

 

I've got a huge radiator outside the case with a large surface area (that's another factor) and very slow (large) fans drawing air through it's core - and with water being a excellent heat conductor versus air - it's a godsend for both cooling and quietness (esp. as I've got two 670s and a CPU to cool).   It's rather brilliant too that the heat is being dumped externally - I built it with that in mind.

 

It's utterly pointless for a console yes - but then the heat that needs to be dissipated in my case is substantively larger and an air solution is stupid loud by comparison.  Whenever I test-bench a new set of cards it drives me nuts having air coolers whine away - I'm just not used to it anymore :)

 

Would I recommend WC to anyone?   Not really unless it ticks all your boxes - it's expensive (done right), has a steep learning curve, requires lots of planning and swapping things can make your break a sweat to say the least.  My last build took about a months work to finish it end to end and cost a packet.  It's worth it to me but most people can get by with air cooling (which has improved a heck of a lot in recent years).   The up sides as mentioned are much cooler components (the 670's peak at 39C), overclocking headroom, quietness and (frankly) the satisfaction of building something er.. 'cool'  :rofl:

 

But yes, my XBOne will be 'on air' this Friday  :D

The fully integrated kits you get today work great though, like the H70 and up(though for bigger CPU's you need 90 or 120's for quietness). downside is that fully integrated systems only do the CPU and not the GPU of course. for now anyway. and until GPU's use a standardized cooling system forever... thoguh there are graphics cards sold with built in WC.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!