Watercooling for Xbox One/PS4


Recommended Posts

I do not really think a water-cooling system is required, it will cause more issues for the companies. Also the price of manufacturing a cooling system for a world consumer trade would be ineffective in regards to manufacturing costs. Game hardware companies can hardly turn over big profits from the hardware units alone anyway. I think if you want a water cooling system then stick to using it in your pc, its more of a luxury than a commercial need.

liquid cooling is so late 1990's. I remember maximumPC magazine doing a write up on a system that came "STOCK" with a watercooling system. we were still in the single-core processors, and people were looking for ways to push every ounce of CPU power they out and yet deal with the tremendous heat issues.

 

unless you are trying to overclock the console, leave it be.

Hello,

They have closed loop no-fuss,no-maintenance systems for water cooling.  If they have it for the PC, it could be done for the next gen consoles.  The biggest worry for that is the dust accumulation on the rads.

Yes but usually PCs are NEVER moved or touched. Consoles can be moved, they are in cabinants, etc. Imagine if one of those tubes are damaged and/or overheated and melt. It would ruin the entire machine.

And you talk about dust accumulation. No gamer should ever have to "service" his console like a PC.

Hello,

Yes but usually PCs are NEVER moved or touched. Consoles can be moved, they are in cabinants, etc. Imagine if one of those tubes are damaged and/or overheated and melt. It would ruin the entire machine.

And you talk about dust accumulation. No gamer should ever have to "service" his console like a PC.

 

again, fully enclosed loop systems like the Corsair H series don't need any services they can be moved without problems, you can swig them around like nunchucks and they won't break. so that's not a problem.

 

but an enclosed system would bump the price by probably 50-100 for no good reason, both for costs of the system and because it's slightly more work to install them.

 

but moving the box and damaged tubes isn't a problem, price is.

 

Also, you have to vacuum the intakes on your consoles just like any PC. 

Hello,

I went ahead and downloaded the Xbox 360 manual:

TAKE CARE OF YOUR XBOX 360

Usage and Cleaning

Use in accordance with these instructions:

? Do not use near any heat sources.

? Only use attachments/accessories specified by Microsoft.

? Disconnect the console power supply from electrical power to

prevent the console from being turned on and off or the disc

tray from being ejected during cleaning.

? Clean the outside of the Xbox 360 console only. Make sure that

no objects are inserted into ventilation openings.

? Use a dry cloth?do not use abrasive pads, detergents, scouring

powders, solvents (for example, alcohol, gasoline, paint thinner,

or benzene), or other liquid or aerosol cleaners.

? Do not use compressed air.

? Do not use DVD head cleaner devices.

? Do not attempt to clean connectors.

? Clean the console feet and the surface on which the Xbox 360

console rests with a dry cloth.

? Clean the surface on which the sensor rests with a dry cloth.

? Do not allow the console or sensor to become wet. To reduce

the risk of fire or shock, do not expose the console or sensor to

rain or other types of moisture.

To clean Xbox 360 game discs, DVDs or audio CDs:

? Hold discs by the edges; do not touch the disc surface with

your fingers.

? Clean discs using a soft cloth, lightly wiping from the center

outward.

? Do not use solvents; they can damage the disc. Do not use disc

cleaning devices.

It says nothing about vacuming and also says not to use compressed air. Most mom and pops families dont even read the manual :rofl:

I'd say if you need to read in a manual that you need to vacuum/clean intakes on a console when the whole console and especially intakes are covered in house dust... well then you're probably one of those americans that need to be told that you can't dry your baby in the microwave. for me, it's common sense, I don't read manuals, but even I know I need to clean dirty consoles and clogged up air vents.  but it probably is in the manuals, just like it's mentioned in the manual not to put the power brick on fluffy carpets or cover the air vents. 

Hello,

I went ahead and downloaded the Xbox 360 manual:

TAKE CARE OF YOUR XBOX 360

Usage and Cleaning

Use in accordance with these instructions:

? Do not use near any heat sources.

? Only use attachments/accessories specified by Microsoft.

? Disconnect the console power supply from electrical power to

prevent the console from being turned on and off or the disc

tray from being ejected during cleaning.

? Clean the outside of the Xbox 360 console only. Make sure that

no objects are inserted into ventilation openings.

? Use a dry cloth?do not use abrasive pads, detergents, scouring

powders, solvents (for example, alcohol, gasoline, paint thinner,

or benzene), or other liquid or aerosol cleaners.

? Do not use compressed air.

? Do not use DVD head cleaner devices.

? Do not attempt to clean connectors.

? Clean the console feet and the surface on which the Xbox 360

console rests with a dry cloth.

? Clean the surface on which the sensor rests with a dry cloth.

? Do not allow the console or sensor to become wet. To reduce

the risk of fire or shock, do not expose the console or sensor to

rain or other types of moisture.

To clean Xbox 360 game discs, DVDs or audio CDs:

? Hold discs by the edges; do not touch the disc surface with

your fingers.

? Clean discs using a soft cloth, lightly wiping from the center

outward.

? Do not use solvents; they can damage the disc. Do not use disc

cleaning devices.

It says nothing about vacuming and also says not to use compressed air. Most mom and pops families dont even read the manual :rofl:

 

but it does say to clean the outside. for most vacuuming is a lot better and easier then trying to wipe of the dust that gets stuck in the vents. 

well then you're probably one of those americans that need to be told that you can't dry your baby in the microwave. f

 

I don't think that comment was necessary.

 

 

As far as vacuuming your console intakes/vents goes, unless you live in a really dusty place, have a pet which moults or you have the console on carpet/close to the floor then I don't think it is all that necessary. Light dusting and keeping a house that is generally clean seems to work pretty well.

 

I had my PS3 for about 3 years before I finally decided to open it and see just how much crap had accumulated inside over the years; there was basically none. I probably ran a greater risk of accidentally damaging the system by opening it than any benefit I would have gained by cleaning it. I didn't even bother wasting my compressed air to clean it.

Hello,

But in those 3 years you probably cleaned the outside and fan grills. you should never really need to open it for cleaning. that goes for computers to if you buy decent cases anyway, but that's up to the builder.

I cant speak for the modern consoles but I had a Xbox (the original Xbox 1) and I never cleaned it....and I live in a attic! Still boots perfectly to XBMC.

But in those 3 years you probably cleaned the outside and fan grills. 

 

True. but I never recall using a vacuum. I never use a vacuum on electronics as a principle.

 

you should never really need to open it for cleaning. 

 

Couldn't help myself. Once I saw a youtube vid about disassembling one I had to pull mine apart. :p

 

 

 that goes for computers to if you buy decent cases anyway, but that's up to the builder. 

 

 

 In my experience, how close a case is to the floor, especially a carpeted floor, dictates how much crap ends up in the case. It's also true with laptops: if it is used primarily on a desk there isn't a lot of crap inside it, if it is used on beds, couches, laps etc. it seems to accumulate more dust and particles.

True. but I never recall using a vacuum. I never use a vacuum on electronics as a principle.

 

 

 

on isn't a problem, just a better way to clean. inside, bad idea, unless it's one designed for electronics that is anti static. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!