Recommended Posts

Try 135.8 degrees Fahrenheit below zero; that's 93.2 degrees below zero Celsius, which sounds only slightly toastier. Better yet, don't try it. That's so cold scientists say it hurts to breathe.

A new look at NASA satellite data revealed that Earth set a new record for coldest temperature recorded. It happened in August 2010 when it hit -135.8 degrees. Then on July 31 of this year, it came close again: -135.3 degrees.

The old record had been -128.6 degrees, which is -89.2 degrees Celsius.

Ice scientist Ted Scambos at the National Snow and Ice Data Center said the new record is "50 degrees colder than anything that has ever been seen in Alaska or Siberia or certainly North Dakota."

"It's more like you'd see on Mars on a nice summer day in the poles," Scambos said, from the American Geophysical Union scientific meeting in San Francisco Monday, where he announced the data. "I'm confident that these pockets are the coldest places on Earth."

However, it won't be in the Guinness Book of World Records because these were satellite measured, not from thermometers, Scambos said.

more

That's so cold scientists say it hurts to breathe.

 

-40C is the lowest temp I've ever experienced and I can second that. It's like the frost bites the air pathways inside your nose. And taking just one breath with your open mouth is all it takes to get a lung inflamation.

  • Like 2

 

Ice scientist Ted Scambos at the National Snow and Ice Data Center said the new record is "50 degrees colder than anything that has ever been seen in Alaska or Siberia or certainly North Dakota."

 
"It's more like you'd see on Mars on a nice summer day in the poles," Scambos said

 

Sounds like that Mars Expedition better wear a jacket.

A cool day, but you need -220?F (-140?C) to freeze CO2 out the air into dry ice ?snow.? THAT would be a really cold day ;)

Coldest in Michigan: Jan. 19th, 1994 in Amasa, -53F?. Coldest wind chill: -127F? in Sault Ste. Marie. A bit brisk.

And who said there was global warming? :laugh:

 

 

This post was intended as light hearted attempt at humor, and should be taken as such.

And if evolution is real why are there still monkeys

Checkmate intellectuals!

 

:facepalm:

  • Like 2

So -93 is the record low.  Great.  What's the average in Antarctica?  -80?  -50?  -20?

 

I'm not exactly worried about the Antarctic ice melting and drowning us all if global temperatures are expected to rise by 4C within the next 100 years.

And if evolution is real why are there still monkeys

Checkmate intellectuals!

 

:facepalm:

 

Lots of intellectuals also dispute global warming.

 

So -93 is the record low.  Great.  What's the average in Antarctica?  -80?  -50?  -20?

 

I'm not exactly worried about the Antarctic ice melting and drowning us all if global temperatures are expected to rise by 4C within the next 100 years.

 

Depends where you are and what season. In June its the middle of winter and it has 24hrs of night and averages at about -60 degrees celcius on the south coast which is a bit warmer than in-land towards the pole.

  • Like 1

Yeah, there's record setting cold in Antarctica, so global warming can't exist. Just ignore the record setting rate of glacial melting in the North Pole, and the extreme rise in the mean temperature of the Earth.
 
Talk about being unable to walk and chew gum at the same time mentally.
 
98% of climate scientists agree that global warming is occurring. At this point, it's like denying that the Earth is round, or that it revolves around the Sun. It's just silly at best, and catastrophically foolish at worst.

201201-201212.png

US_temps_2012_0.jpg
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/110/0/tmp/12/12/1895-2012?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true

 

  • Like 5

When I was a Scout we were camping when it hit -20F?. I can tell you for dead certain a urine stream does not freeze at that temp, but it definitely gives off a fog. Remember too that it's a salt solution at about 98.6F?, so it will take a lot to freeze it on the fly with <1m of travel..

global warming is occurring

 

 

It certainly is happening, there cannot be doubt. The question that still needs an answer and is continually ignored to pave way for assumptions and opinions - why it is happening.

 

And why should I give a flying speck of dust about it.

Yeah, there's record setting cold in Antarctica, so global warming can't exist. Just ignore the record setting rate of glacial melting in the North Pole, and the extreme rise in the mean temperature of the Earth.

 

Talk about being unable to walk and chew gum at the same time mentally.

 

98% of climate scientists agree that global warming is occurring. At this point, it's like denying that the Earth is round, or that it revolves around the Sun. It's just silly at best, and catastrophically foolish at worst.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/time-series/us/110/0/tmp/12/12/1895-2012?base_prd=true&firstbaseyear=1901&lastbaseyear=2000&filter=true

 

i don't think most anyone is disputing the claim of global warming, most just dispute the cause of it.

i don't think most anyone is disputing the claim of global warming, most just dispute the cause of it.

 

Whether it's happening or whether it's man-made, I think it's a moot point.  Personally, I'm all for the alternative energy research--I just don't believe that introducing so-called green taxes and carbon credit will do jack-###### to save us.  This is how science gets turned into politics, and ultimately stalls.  Al Gore (a politician) hasn't done any of us any favor--only his bank account.

It certainly is happening, there cannot be doubt. The question that still needs an answer and is continually ignored to pave way for assumptions and opinions - why it is happening.

And why should I give a flying speck of dust about it.

i don't think most anyone is disputing the claim of global warming, most just dispute the cause of it.

I was responding to comments on the first page that made no mention of causality, but rather just poked fun at the general idea of climate change. Believe it or not, there are still many who agree with Ron Paul's statement, that climate change is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on humanity.

 

Climate change is probably the most politicized topic of science since Galileo showed the fact of heliocentricity. Several groups, mainly those who profit from fossil fuels, have a divested interest in debunking global warming. The first tactic was to show that no warming was occurring. They stuck with that until the evidence became so overwhelming, and publicly known, that it was unequivocally foolhardy. Now the tactic is to show that even though they were wrong and that warming is occurring, it is not caused by the use of fossil fuels and human intervention is useless.

 

Human activity has caused at least half of climate change in the last half-century, hundreds of scientists say. They are 95% certain of this, the surest they've ever been, says a United Nations report published Friday.

That activity? Driving cars, running power plants on coal and oil, torching swathes of forestland and debris; anything involving burning carbon-based fuels and emitting greenhouse gases.

"It should serve as yet another wake-up call our activities today have a profound impact on society, not only for us, but for many generations to come," Michel Jarraud, head of the World Meteorological Organization, said at a news conference in Stockholm, Sweden.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry echoed his words in an official statement.

"Those who deny the science or choose excuses over action are playing with fire," he said. "Once again, the science grows clearer, the case grows more compelling, and the costs of inaction grow beyond anything that anyone with conscience or common sense should be willing to even contemplate."

In 2007, climate researchers were already 90% sure that people were behind a seemingly small rise in global average temperature of about half a degree Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit) that has already notched up extreme weather events such as heat waves, droughts and flooding.

While 90% constitutes a "very likely" degree of certainty, Friday's report stating scientists are now 95% sure indicates an "extremely likely" degree of certainty, which is considered the gold standard when discussing probability.

The effects humans are already causing are expected to increase for a century or more, the report reads. Weather catastrophes, previously called storms of the century, are on their way to striking every 20 years or even more frequently.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/27/world/climate-change-report/

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!