Core i3 to Core i7- new motherboard needed?


Recommended Posts

O o.... Do I need a new motherboard? I was under the impression that all Intel Core series processors were interchangeable. 

 

See attached pic where my new intel core i7 4770k appears to be  a bit too small for the cpu housing on my Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H.

 

Thanks in advance fellas.

post-192005-0-77119900-1386816482.jpg

Well...

 

1) The performance increases between generations of Intel CPUs for the last few years hasn't been *that* great to warrant an upgrade unless you absolutely want the latest chip, e.g. if you had a Sandy Bridge CPU, you're still in pretty good shape and there wouldn't be much reason to upgrade to say Ivy Bridge or Haswell.

 

2) There isn't exactly a "future-proof" socket - they tend to change from generation to generation. There is socket 2011 which is used for the higher end CPUs (for the foreseeable future at least as Haswell-E will still use it). But since you already have a 4770K, I'd recommend getting a socket 1150 (Z87) board instead and ride it for a few years. It's a hell of a CPU!  :p

Yes, you need a new motherboard. Your impression is inaccurate, while their are usually multiple processors that will work for any given socket, there are many different sockets used throughout the entire Intel Core series. Your current motherboard has an LGA1155 socket, which is suitable for a lot of Intel "Sandy Bridge" and "Ivy Bridge" based Intel Core series processors, while your new Intel Core i7 4770K CPU is "Haswell" based and requires a motherboard with an LGA1150 CPU socket.

Damn, beaten to it by others :p

Darn. Is the Socket 1150 the future of Intel core chips (want to be as future proof as possible here).

As Boo Berry said above, they change fairly regularly. To be as "future proof" as possible in this regard, all one can possibly do is jump on a new socket as soon as it becomes available, thus "riding it out" for as long as possible... Whether you should return your new CPU and simply get a more powerful CPU for your existing board, or whether you should get a new board is your decision to make, we can't really even give a recommendation without knowing more background on your financial situation and processing requirements.

I predict LGA1145 for Broadwell. :p Assuming of course Broadwell comes to desktops which I have my doubts it will.

Broadwell is simply a die shrink of Haswell, so won't they be sticking with the same sockets until Skylake?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Tick-Tock

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_socket

There are 4 generation Intel Core? processors. Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, and the latest Haswell. All 4 generation have their own variety of i3/i5 and i7 processors. The generation are not all interchangeable.

 

You have an Ivy Bridge motherboard. Ivy Bridge uses LGA 1155 and LGA 2011. The one you have is a Z77 that uses LGA 1155. The 4770K is an Haswell i7 processors, which needs a Z87 motherboard. Z87 is LGA 1150.

There are 4 generation Intel Core? processors. Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, and the latest Haswell. All 4 generation have their own variety of i3/i5 and i7 processors. The generation are not all interchangeable.

 

You have an Ivy Bridge motherboard. Ivy Bridge uses LGA 1155 and LGA 2011. The one you have is a Z77 that uses LGA 1155. The 4770K is an Haswell i7 processors, which needs a Z87 motherboard. Z87 is LGA 1150.

Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (second-generation and third-generation) ARE interchangeable, and can use the same motherboards, despite their releases using different chipsets (Z68 and Z77 respectively).  Therefore, you CAN run Sandy Bridge in a Z77 motherboard, or Ivy Bridge in Z68 - however, I recommend Z77 chipsets for either generation (due to chipset improvements in Z77 compared to Z68) - both second-generation and third-generation CPUs use LGA1155.

 

LGA2011 is a variant of Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E).  Only one high-end chipset (X79) was released for LGA2011.

 

Haswell (LGA1150) is the successor to Ivy Bridge, and has the flagship Z87 chipset - it is not electrically compatible with Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, or with Z68/Z77.

Yep, unless they choose to gouge the consumers into purchasing new motherboards AGAIN (which they won't obviously... hopefully), heh. Again, assuming Broadwell come to desktops. Can't wait for Skylake though!

 

They already announced that Broadwell would be LGA1150. Skylake is going to use something called LGA1151. I imagine the LGA2011 socket will change also.

Well...

 

1) The performance increases between generations of Intel CPUs for the last few years hasn't been *that* great to warrant an upgrade unless you absolutely want the latest chip, e.g. if you had a Sandy Bridge CPU, you're still in pretty good shape and there wouldn't be much reason to upgrade to say Ivy Bridge or Haswell.

 

2) There isn't exactly a "future-proof" socket - they tend to change from generation to generation. There is socket 2011 which is used for the higher end CPUs (for the foreseeable future at least as Haswell-E will still use it). But since you already have a 4770K, I'd recommend getting a socket 1150 (Z87) board instead and ride it for a few years. It's a hell of a CPU!  :p

 

High-end Haswell's (Haswell-E) don't use LGA2011, they use something called LGA2011-3. It has the same number of pins but a different pin-out than the original. They are incompatible because of the pin-out changes.

 

Broadwell-E will probably use LGA2011-3, but I doubt Skylake will given that Intel already announced socket changes from LGA1550 to LGA1551 for the mainstream processors for Skylake (they've shifted sockets across the board for all of their processors when they've changed them for each core i7 generation --> likely due to chipset and feature changes rendering incompatibilities with older chipsets).

Its Intel's evil plan to make upgraders cough out more money if they want to upgrade the CPU. It should have been possible for Intel to keep socket pins unchanged for 3-4 years but that won't be as profitable.

Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (second-generation and third-generation) ARE interchangeable, and can use the same motherboards, despite their releases using different chipsets (Z68 and Z77 respectively).  Therefore, you CAN run Sandy Bridge in a Z77 motherboard, or Ivy Bridge in Z68 - however, I recommend Z77 chipsets for either generation (due to chipset improvements in Z77 compared to Z68) - both second-generation and third-generation CPUs use LGA1155.

 

LGA2011 is a variant of Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E).  Only one high-end chipset (X79) was released for LGA2011.

 

Haswell (LGA1150) is the successor to Ivy Bridge, and has the flagship Z87 chipset - it is not electrically compatible with Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, or with Z68/Z77.

 

You're simply reiterating what I've already state. I don't disagree, that's why I said "the generation are not all interchangeable", which is true. The Haswell i7-4770K he has, which is a Z87 CPU, and the Z77/Z68 are not interchangeable. He needs a new chipset.

Its Intel's evil plan to make upgraders cough out more money if they want to upgrade the CPU. It should have been possible for Intel to keep socket pins unchanged for 3-4 years but that won't be as profitable.

 

Intel isn't even make motherboards anymore after Haswell, so where's the profit in them for you changing? Did you ever buy an Intel board in the first place? They only really ever made reference boards for their chipsets anyway. It was never a large business or focus for them.

<snip>

 

Haswell (LGA1150) is the successor to Ivy Bridge, and has the flagship Z87 chipset - it is not electrically compatible with Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, or with Z68/Z77.

 

I said this a few post back, but there are pin-out changes in the design so it really isn't the same socket. It just has the same amount of pins and a similar mechanical structure (i guess you don't fix what isn't broken?). I imagine the pin-out changes are analogous to the pin-out changes in LGA1150.

Intel isn't even make motherboards anymore after Haswell, so where's the profit in them for you changing? Did you ever buy an Intel board in the first place? They only really ever made reference boards for their chipsets anyway. It was never a large business or focus for them.

But OEMs have to keep on licensing the reference design from them everytime, don't they? So we still end up paying Intel each time.

But OEMs have to keep on licensing the reference design from them everytime, don't they? So we still end up paying Intel each time.

 

Reference design for the socket? That's not how PCB manufacturing works. Intel does have reference designs for motherboard PCBs which they license under NDA to Intel partners. These would come with regardless of socket changes with each new generation of processor and chipset. The point is that you don't license the socket itself.

 

Let me discuss briefly the PCB manufacturing to show how the socket and chipset come into play for motherboard designers:

 

When designing PCBs you don't fabricate ICs or connectors you want to use, you purchase them from 3rd party distributors (the same as you would a processor). The process works like this: you design and fab you PCB, then mount components to the board. These can range from controllers for various things (USB, IDE, SATA, PATA, chipset) to connectors to place on your board (receptacles, headers, anything you plug something into). Each of these things comes with a datasheet describing the physical layout (so you can design the PCB to fit the component correctly), pin-out, and design characteristics of the component.

 

Let's go through the list of the most important parts (just to show that these things are purchasable and the documentation is available for anyone without licensing):

 

LGA1155 socket receptacle:

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/guide/2nd-gen-core-lga1155-socket-guide.pdf (mechanical and thermal design guidelines -- even list suppliers)

http://www.molex.com/pdm_docs/sd/475960233_sd.pdf (datasheet)

http://www.digikey.com/product-search/en/connectors-interconnects/sockets-for-ics-transistors/1442972?k=lga1155 (list of connectors to purchase)

 

Z77 chipset:

http://ark.intel.com/products/64024/Intel-BD82Z77-PCH (Intel ark link)

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/7-series-chipset-pch-datasheet.pdf (datasheet)

http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Intel/BD82Z77-S-LJC7/?qs=L4m7d03WznnvkT2%252b7C5XjQ%3D%3D (link to purchase it)

 

3rd Generation core processor pin-out and functionality:

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/3rd-gen-core-desktop-vol-1-datasheet.pdf

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/3rd-gen-core-desktop-vol-2-datasheet.pdf

  • 3 years later...

My intention is to assemble  a new PC on  a Motherboard that has M.2 sockets, DDR4 and USB 3.1. Many of the Motherboards that I study that it can accept Intel processors from  i3  to  i7.

 In order to save money for  short period I wish to  accept i3 as the processor fir the time being and later on when the cost of i& comes down go for the higher one. Is this feasible ?

8 minutes ago, Dr K. A. Rasheed said:

My intention is to assemble  a new PC on  a Motherboard that has M.2 sockets, DDR4 and USB 3.1. Many of the Motherboards that I study that it can accept Intel processors from  i3  to  i7.

 In order to save money for  short period I wish to  accept i3 as the processor fir the time being and later on when the cost of i& comes down go for the higher one. Is this feasible ?

Yes...as long as the motherboard supports it.  

 

Please do not bump old threads.

 

//locked

  • Jim K locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!