Core i3 to Core i7- new motherboard needed?


Recommended Posts

O o.... Do I need a new motherboard? I was under the impression that all Intel Core series processors were interchangeable. 

 

See attached pic where my new intel core i7 4770k appears to be  a bit too small for the cpu housing on my Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H.

 

Thanks in advance fellas.

post-192005-0-77119900-1386816482.jpg

Well...

 

1) The performance increases between generations of Intel CPUs for the last few years hasn't been *that* great to warrant an upgrade unless you absolutely want the latest chip, e.g. if you had a Sandy Bridge CPU, you're still in pretty good shape and there wouldn't be much reason to upgrade to say Ivy Bridge or Haswell.

 

2) There isn't exactly a "future-proof" socket - they tend to change from generation to generation. There is socket 2011 which is used for the higher end CPUs (for the foreseeable future at least as Haswell-E will still use it). But since you already have a 4770K, I'd recommend getting a socket 1150 (Z87) board instead and ride it for a few years. It's a hell of a CPU!  :p

Yes, you need a new motherboard. Your impression is inaccurate, while their are usually multiple processors that will work for any given socket, there are many different sockets used throughout the entire Intel Core series. Your current motherboard has an LGA1155 socket, which is suitable for a lot of Intel "Sandy Bridge" and "Ivy Bridge" based Intel Core series processors, while your new Intel Core i7 4770K CPU is "Haswell" based and requires a motherboard with an LGA1150 CPU socket.

Damn, beaten to it by others :p

Darn. Is the Socket 1150 the future of Intel core chips (want to be as future proof as possible here).

As Boo Berry said above, they change fairly regularly. To be as "future proof" as possible in this regard, all one can possibly do is jump on a new socket as soon as it becomes available, thus "riding it out" for as long as possible... Whether you should return your new CPU and simply get a more powerful CPU for your existing board, or whether you should get a new board is your decision to make, we can't really even give a recommendation without knowing more background on your financial situation and processing requirements.

I predict LGA1145 for Broadwell. :p Assuming of course Broadwell comes to desktops which I have my doubts it will.

Broadwell is simply a die shrink of Haswell, so won't they be sticking with the same sockets until Skylake?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Tick-Tock

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_socket

There are 4 generation Intel Core? processors. Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, and the latest Haswell. All 4 generation have their own variety of i3/i5 and i7 processors. The generation are not all interchangeable.

 

You have an Ivy Bridge motherboard. Ivy Bridge uses LGA 1155 and LGA 2011. The one you have is a Z77 that uses LGA 1155. The 4770K is an Haswell i7 processors, which needs a Z87 motherboard. Z87 is LGA 1150.

There are 4 generation Intel Core? processors. Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, and the latest Haswell. All 4 generation have their own variety of i3/i5 and i7 processors. The generation are not all interchangeable.

 

You have an Ivy Bridge motherboard. Ivy Bridge uses LGA 1155 and LGA 2011. The one you have is a Z77 that uses LGA 1155. The 4770K is an Haswell i7 processors, which needs a Z87 motherboard. Z87 is LGA 1150.

Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (second-generation and third-generation) ARE interchangeable, and can use the same motherboards, despite their releases using different chipsets (Z68 and Z77 respectively).  Therefore, you CAN run Sandy Bridge in a Z77 motherboard, or Ivy Bridge in Z68 - however, I recommend Z77 chipsets for either generation (due to chipset improvements in Z77 compared to Z68) - both second-generation and third-generation CPUs use LGA1155.

 

LGA2011 is a variant of Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E).  Only one high-end chipset (X79) was released for LGA2011.

 

Haswell (LGA1150) is the successor to Ivy Bridge, and has the flagship Z87 chipset - it is not electrically compatible with Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, or with Z68/Z77.

Yep, unless they choose to gouge the consumers into purchasing new motherboards AGAIN (which they won't obviously... hopefully), heh. Again, assuming Broadwell come to desktops. Can't wait for Skylake though!

 

They already announced that Broadwell would be LGA1150. Skylake is going to use something called LGA1151. I imagine the LGA2011 socket will change also.

Well...

 

1) The performance increases between generations of Intel CPUs for the last few years hasn't been *that* great to warrant an upgrade unless you absolutely want the latest chip, e.g. if you had a Sandy Bridge CPU, you're still in pretty good shape and there wouldn't be much reason to upgrade to say Ivy Bridge or Haswell.

 

2) There isn't exactly a "future-proof" socket - they tend to change from generation to generation. There is socket 2011 which is used for the higher end CPUs (for the foreseeable future at least as Haswell-E will still use it). But since you already have a 4770K, I'd recommend getting a socket 1150 (Z87) board instead and ride it for a few years. It's a hell of a CPU!  :p

 

High-end Haswell's (Haswell-E) don't use LGA2011, they use something called LGA2011-3. It has the same number of pins but a different pin-out than the original. They are incompatible because of the pin-out changes.

 

Broadwell-E will probably use LGA2011-3, but I doubt Skylake will given that Intel already announced socket changes from LGA1550 to LGA1551 for the mainstream processors for Skylake (they've shifted sockets across the board for all of their processors when they've changed them for each core i7 generation --> likely due to chipset and feature changes rendering incompatibilities with older chipsets).

Its Intel's evil plan to make upgraders cough out more money if they want to upgrade the CPU. It should have been possible for Intel to keep socket pins unchanged for 3-4 years but that won't be as profitable.

Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (second-generation and third-generation) ARE interchangeable, and can use the same motherboards, despite their releases using different chipsets (Z68 and Z77 respectively).  Therefore, you CAN run Sandy Bridge in a Z77 motherboard, or Ivy Bridge in Z68 - however, I recommend Z77 chipsets for either generation (due to chipset improvements in Z77 compared to Z68) - both second-generation and third-generation CPUs use LGA1155.

 

LGA2011 is a variant of Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge (Sandy Bridge-E and Ivy Bridge-E).  Only one high-end chipset (X79) was released for LGA2011.

 

Haswell (LGA1150) is the successor to Ivy Bridge, and has the flagship Z87 chipset - it is not electrically compatible with Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, or with Z68/Z77.

 

You're simply reiterating what I've already state. I don't disagree, that's why I said "the generation are not all interchangeable", which is true. The Haswell i7-4770K he has, which is a Z87 CPU, and the Z77/Z68 are not interchangeable. He needs a new chipset.

Its Intel's evil plan to make upgraders cough out more money if they want to upgrade the CPU. It should have been possible for Intel to keep socket pins unchanged for 3-4 years but that won't be as profitable.

 

Intel isn't even make motherboards anymore after Haswell, so where's the profit in them for you changing? Did you ever buy an Intel board in the first place? They only really ever made reference boards for their chipsets anyway. It was never a large business or focus for them.

<snip>

 

Haswell (LGA1150) is the successor to Ivy Bridge, and has the flagship Z87 chipset - it is not electrically compatible with Ivy Bridge OR Sandy Bridge, or with Z68/Z77.

 

I said this a few post back, but there are pin-out changes in the design so it really isn't the same socket. It just has the same amount of pins and a similar mechanical structure (i guess you don't fix what isn't broken?). I imagine the pin-out changes are analogous to the pin-out changes in LGA1150.

Intel isn't even make motherboards anymore after Haswell, so where's the profit in them for you changing? Did you ever buy an Intel board in the first place? They only really ever made reference boards for their chipsets anyway. It was never a large business or focus for them.

But OEMs have to keep on licensing the reference design from them everytime, don't they? So we still end up paying Intel each time.

But OEMs have to keep on licensing the reference design from them everytime, don't they? So we still end up paying Intel each time.

 

Reference design for the socket? That's not how PCB manufacturing works. Intel does have reference designs for motherboard PCBs which they license under NDA to Intel partners. These would come with regardless of socket changes with each new generation of processor and chipset. The point is that you don't license the socket itself.

 

Let me discuss briefly the PCB manufacturing to show how the socket and chipset come into play for motherboard designers:

 

When designing PCBs you don't fabricate ICs or connectors you want to use, you purchase them from 3rd party distributors (the same as you would a processor). The process works like this: you design and fab you PCB, then mount components to the board. These can range from controllers for various things (USB, IDE, SATA, PATA, chipset) to connectors to place on your board (receptacles, headers, anything you plug something into). Each of these things comes with a datasheet describing the physical layout (so you can design the PCB to fit the component correctly), pin-out, and design characteristics of the component.

 

Let's go through the list of the most important parts (just to show that these things are purchasable and the documentation is available for anyone without licensing):

 

LGA1155 socket receptacle:

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/doc/guide/2nd-gen-core-lga1155-socket-guide.pdf (mechanical and thermal design guidelines -- even list suppliers)

http://www.molex.com/pdm_docs/sd/475960233_sd.pdf (datasheet)

http://www.digikey.com/product-search/en/connectors-interconnects/sockets-for-ics-transistors/1442972?k=lga1155 (list of connectors to purchase)

 

Z77 chipset:

http://ark.intel.com/products/64024/Intel-BD82Z77-PCH (Intel ark link)

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/7-series-chipset-pch-datasheet.pdf (datasheet)

http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Intel/BD82Z77-S-LJC7/?qs=L4m7d03WznnvkT2%252b7C5XjQ%3D%3D (link to purchase it)

 

3rd Generation core processor pin-out and functionality:

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/3rd-gen-core-desktop-vol-1-datasheet.pdf

http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/3rd-gen-core-desktop-vol-2-datasheet.pdf

  • 3 years later...

My intention is to assemble  a new PC on  a Motherboard that has M.2 sockets, DDR4 and USB 3.1. Many of the Motherboards that I study that it can accept Intel processors from  i3  to  i7.

 In order to save money for  short period I wish to  accept i3 as the processor fir the time being and later on when the cost of i& comes down go for the higher one. Is this feasible ?

8 minutes ago, Dr K. A. Rasheed said:

My intention is to assemble  a new PC on  a Motherboard that has M.2 sockets, DDR4 and USB 3.1. Many of the Motherboards that I study that it can accept Intel processors from  i3  to  i7.

 In order to save money for  short period I wish to  accept i3 as the processor fir the time being and later on when the cost of i& comes down go for the higher one. Is this feasible ?

Yes...as long as the motherboard supports it.  

 

Please do not bump old threads.

 

//locked

  • Jim K locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before a part ever reaches the plant floor. This hands-on process prevents the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions. CEO Jim Farley noted that this return to human oversight quickly decreased warranty coverages and recall costs. The change saves the automaker hundreds of millions of dollars as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 Good grief, Apple hasn't even released a first folding phone and the Apple faithful is already obsessing over the sequel? Seriously people, go out and touch grass... because this level of obsession is borderline stalkery/neurotic.
    • I checked on the IPs associated with every login and they're all mine... And whenever I get a new prompt, there is no activity to show for it. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!