How many SSD's do you own?


How many SSD's do you own?  

283 members have voted

  1. 1. How many SSD's do you own?

    • 1
      58
    • 2
      50
    • 3
      35
    • 4
      15
    • 5
      11
    • 6
      4
    • 7
      3
    • 8
      3
    • 9
      0
    • 10
      2
    • 11
      0
    • 12
      0
    • 13
      0
    • More than 14
      5
    • All of my computers have an SSD in them.
      46
    • I don't own an SSD yet.
      51


Recommended Posts

Pfffff... I have a boot SSD for win8, but to say that a normal platter harddrive is slow? Man.... we sure take speed for granted, my work OS is on an HDD (2.5" !!), startup time may be slow, after that, I bet it flies compared to most of the computers here (An SSD is not an excuse to not properly maintain an OS instalation)

 

Why do you think your HDD flies to compared to SSD installations? What exactly do you do to maintain on an OS installation to keep it fast for an SSD? The only thing I can think is potentially not having crapware installed (and even then it really isn't an issue for access to the disk -- more on that below). On an HDD you actually have to do defragmentation and making sure you don't have a ton of things running that are doing concurrent disk accesses.

 

Food for thought: take two brand new installations of Windows - one with an SSD and one with an HDD. Throw 16GBs of cloud synced storage on both (~10,000-20,000 files). On boot, the cloud storage SW will iterate through the files and check to make sure everything is up-to-date. On the HDD installation, it will take 3-5 minutes to verify all of the files and while that is occurring it will be impossible to do almost anything on the computer (without huge lags and slowdown) because the hdd head is currently rapidly reading other things for verification and does really poorly with rapid concurrent accesses. On the SSD installation, it will take 30-45 seconds and even while the files are being scanned everything will still run normally because you have very high concurrent access speeds.

Why do you think your HDD flies to compared to SSD installations? What exactly do you do to maintain on an OS installation to keep it fast for an SSD? The only thing I can think is potentially not having crapware installed (and even then it really isn't an issue for access to the disk -- more on that below). On an HDD you actually have to do defragmentation and making sure you don't have a ton of things running that are doing concurrent disk accesses.

 

Food for thought: take two brand new installations of Windows - one with an SSD and one with an HDD. Throw 16GBs of cloud synced storage on both (~10,000-20,000 files). On boot, the cloud storage SW will iterate through the files and check to make sure everything is up-to-date. On the HDD installation, it will take 3-5 minutes to verify all of the files and while that is occurring it will be impossible to do almost anything on the computer (without huge lags and slowdown) because the hdd head is currently rapidly reading other things for verification and does really poorly with rapid concurrent accesses. On the SSD installation, it will take 30-45 seconds and even while the files are being scanned everything will still run normally because you have very high concurrent access speeds.

Yeah... eh, I have cloud services, I seriously prefer redownload the data against that. Even so, that's a very atypical scenario. Seriously, HDDs are great as long as you keep the computer free of malware.

Yeah... eh, I have cloud services, I seriously prefer redownload the data against that. Even so, that's a very atypical scenario. Seriously, HDDs are great as long as you keep the computer free of malware.

HDDs are fine, but SSDs still have about 100x faster access times, so it completely fair to say that HDDs are incredibly slow in comparison.

 

I'm willing to bet if my PC at work had a SSD, I could get twice as much work done.  It's astounding how much time I waste waiting for things to load.

3 total, over my two computers.

 

There's two in my laptop, in RAID0. One in my desktop.

 

If you think the speed difference of an SSD isn't worth it you couldn't be more wrong. Windows moves into a whole new level of responsiveness with an SSD. Even with the cleanest of installs the difference is gigantic. Sure, you don't get the storage space, but there are traditional HDD's for that. Combine the two for the best of both worlds.

 

In my 13" laptop (my primary computer) I have these two Toshiba SSD's, each 64GB in RAID0 for a 128GB Windows drive. I keep all my software (besides some games) on it and it is fast, really fast. For my downloads, large games, photos and some VM's I have a 1TB Hitachi drive (5400RPM). I've had a dualboot with Windows 8 running off the HDD for a while (and 7 off the SSD) and the difference was enormous. Where the often-praised Windows 8 took over 40 seconds to boot I was up and running in 7 within 15 seconds. And the 8 install was a lot cleaner than the 7 install.

If you think the speed difference of an SSD isn't worth it you couldn't be more wrong. Windows moves into a whole new level of responsiveness with an SSD. Even with the cleanest of installs the difference is gigantic. Sure, you don't get the storage space, but there are traditional HDD's for that. Combine the two for the best of both worlds.

 

I've actually had people argue that they didn't notice any difference at all in their machine with an SSD. At that point, I just assume a person is being insincere and stop talking to them. I can't think of any scenario where that would ever be the case unless they never used their computer in the first place :D

I've actually had people argue that they didn't notice any difference at all in their machine with an SSD. At that point, I just assume a person is being insincere and stop talking to them. I can't think of any scenario where that would ever be the case unless they never used their computer in the first place :D

No kidding, if my mom can tell the difference...heh

 

Although SSHDs are pretty dang nice too, still not quite the same.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Thought on my first SSD upgrade 

 

I just want to share my first personal SSD upgrade experience though i have installed for several customers. 
 
My specs are i5 3570K || GA-B75M-D3H || 2x 4GB Hyper X || 240gb seagate 600 ssd + Toshiba 1tb || Geforce GTX 660 windforce OC || Silencer mk iii 400W || Silverstone RL01 || WIn8 Pro 64 || AOC 21.5in IPS 1080p || Logitech F510 || Razer Abyssus

Only the SSD is newly added by cloning out the primary drive. 
 
I had my OS and programs on 320 gb WD black notebook hard drive. I did that for two reason one is to save money while buying the system second i always had a plan for SSD.
 
I ran out of storage but i want to still keep the Notebook hard drive primary because i can clone it to ssd when ever i want. So i bought a 1TB Toshiba drive and added for data.
 
Now my PC is ready for upgrade any time but i was waiting for the perfect deal.
 
First i have to tell what i do
1) Surfing (commonly 2,3 (All the time) tabs some time 4,5(Once in a day) but rarely (Once a month) 50 tabs when selecting photos from sites
 
2) Photoshop / Premier Pro / After effect. 
 
3) Games 
 
4) Skype for IM
 
I always keep my pc maintained in old days like clearing temp files and defraging. Thanks to the new OS which minimizes the maintaining tasks. All the start up items are i know and i need them. All the services running are needed for me. So simply i don't have a bloat ware. I never had a personal malware issue for last 12 years. I only had at the time of getting to know what is a PC when i'm studying O/L.  I always keep windows updated. 
 
Before I swap it with SSD i took the disk speed test on my WD3200BEKT and it is 
 
3y9u.jpg
 
Then my data drive 
 
obgz.jpg
 
 
After swapping the WD with Seagate 600 240 gb SSD
5cfv.jpg
 
So definitely now my disk is faster. 
 
But in real life for my present usage 
 
What are the pros:
SSD user pride
Less Noise
HDD light rarely blinks
 
Cons
Though Theoretically disk access speed has increased i don't say it is speed demon or sort of. I can feel it increased but not that much as i have read in sites. That may be the way i maintained my PC in the past. I don't find SSD worth for the price (With out a deal). For me it is not much of a increase. that include all my usage and star up shut down. Before i use gigabyte ultra fast boot option on F15 bios. 
 
I have a speculation the people say wow after SSD might be having lot of bloat ware or in the need of torturing the disk that they must have to. 
 
 
I'm still happy as i bought a top 240gb drive for very cheaper price on black friday. But i just thought to share my thoughts 

Technically one, my system has a 24gb boot SSD that gets me from cold to login screen in ~6-10 seconds, but after that it seems like the HDD does all the rest of the work

 

Will be getting a "real" SSD sometime soon 

  • 8 months later...

Just one on my desktop but love it so much that I want to get one for my old laptop, inject some new life into it. If anyone is on the fence about buying one, go for it! They're simply amazing. Going back to a platter disk even on a fast-ish computer hurts now :D

I happily own 2 SSD's in my Desktop, both rMBP's are SSD's and my new HTPC / SteamBox will be SSD. I also have 2 SSD's that were retired into external drives.

 

SSD is the only way going forward, ill have spinning rust for data I don't give a ###### about

I have two at home.

One in the desktop OCZ Vertex 2e as a 120GB OS drive.

One in my laptop (Dell XPS 15) that is a 512GB.

 

I use a regular hard drive at work and as i've been with an SSD for over 4 years now.

Doing stuff on a regular drive is so slow. I moan about it all the time.

Takes about 30 seconds to load Photoshop CC.

On the laptop it took about 3-5 seconds. :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!