Qualcomm Employee: Apple's 64-Bit A7 Chip 'Hit Us In The Gut'


Recommended Posts

Nah, it is what sanctified said, Samsung manufactures their processors (well SoCs now). They used Cortex series chips for the 3 and 4 and standard samsung processors prior. They've never used qualcomm parts.

 

EDIT: looks like both the 5 and 5s use straight up apple designed processors, so they aren't licensed from anyone at all. The Cortex ones were licensed from ARM.

 

A7 is still an ARM processor, so they're paying a license to ARM.

I've not quite understood why there's Apple bashing in the thread to do something like 64 bit cpu's.  Can anyone really, when they deep down thing of it, think it was a ego / E-penis thing and not see any practical application to it?

 

i'll ignore the igorance about 64bit being only usefull for >4gb ram, despite gawd damn journalists who should know better.

 

It's a massive step forward and even Intel and Qualcomm have said it was on their roadmap but they didn't expect the need to come so soon.  Lets not forget the Arm cpu inside the 5s is heavily customised leaning more towards Apple have designed the chip themselves and not just bought an off the shelf part.

 

The amount of data registers alone make up theoretically any issues with 32 bit running on 64 bit along. I seem to recall way back in the past Apple designed their own motherboard so that the track lines were the shortest distance feasible from one component to the other.  Now that is overkill lol

 

On the flip side is that for NOW, right here and now it's potentially overkill to have an almost desktop class cpu in a phone but who knows what the future holds.  Many people said what's the point of internet on the phone etc etc.  Although not the same we live in a world where normally more speed or more cores = better on the PC and we;ve become accustomed to that benchmarking.  64 bit comes along with a faster cpu in general, even if the old cpu can beat it in some very specific tests, and yet it;s painted as a bad thing.

 

Apple gives out the hardware and then developers work their magic stuff on it.  So we'll see what the A7 is really capable of when developers get their heads around it I reckon

You do realize that 64-bit has more advantages than just memory capacity, right?...

It have yes, but is those other 64-bit advantages something that you can see working better and faster than it does on a 32-bit CPU?

 

The answer here is that you wont see ANY real life differences from using an iPhone 5S with 32-bit CPU to an iPhone 5s with a 64-bit CPU today. If the differences had been noticable, then i would agree it would be a good thing to have, but there isn't any speed improvements or any performance improvements right now from going from 32-bit to 64-bit CPU's on mobile phones.

 

The speed improvements you see from iPhone 5 to iPhone 5S is not because of the 64-bit CPU, but because the new A7 CPU chip is using a totally new architecture witch is faster than the A6 architecture that was in the iPhone 5.

 

The problem here is that you barely sees any speed imporovements from launching apps and loading things from iPhone 5 to iPhone 5S in alot of apps and games even when the A7 CPU is much faster than the A6 one.

 

So as for today, the 64-bit CPU gives very little or no benefits over 32-bit CPU's for the normal man who use the iPhones. The only thing that might be relevant is more security, but if that's all, then i don't really see all of the hyping and fuss about the 64-bit CPU in the new iPhones.

What a ridiculous thing to say...  A measely little mobile processor is NOT the 64bit evangelist you think it is. Intel and AMD are already there and have been for years; Microsoft are the ones making it mainstream as their OS is the market driver.

I'm talking about in the mobile market.

Well, in the defense of sane architecture, an ISA is mostly only as useful as the instructions you use or need. Throwing 64-bit instructions in is useless if you don't need the extended range provided by the numbers. The performance gains reported are most likely just the result of more registers being available and simply better scheduling as a result.

 

EDIT: anyone know if apple is bundling both 64-bit and 32-bit compiled codes in one executable like what is done for Osx (and should be done for windows...)?

Many of the instructions in x86-64 goes unused as well. 30% of the instructions were used 83% of the time, or something similar to that respect.

So as for today, the 64-bit CPU gives very little or no benefits over 32-bit CPU's for the normal man who use the iPhones. The only thing that might be relevant is more security, but if that's all, then i don't really see all of the hyping and fuss about the 64-bit CPU in the new iPhones.

Security actually is a very very big deal...  Especially since a lot of people do their banking and shopping on their mobile devices.

If security isn't ramped up sooner than later, more than just Android will have malware and virus problems.

There are A LOT of good reasons why everybody should make the transition, and performance is just a bonus.

Lets face it.  Its the only 'new' thing apple really added to the ipad other than the standard lighter/thinner approach.  The screen is vastly inferior to the Nexus 7's/Android offerings, and in the long run the iPad air will just seem like another average incremental update. 

Lets face it.  Its the only 'new' thing apple really added to the ipad other than the standard lighter/thinner approach.  The screen is vastly inferior to the Nexus 7's/Android offerings, and in the long run the iPad air will just seem like another average incremental update. 

Lmao. How is thee iPad air display "vastly inferior" to the Nexus 7? Because it has a lower pixel density lol? The iPad uses the new IGZO display, which came out this year and is more energy efficient than a typical LCD display. It also uses a patented chemical coating used to resist skin oil residue. The Nexus 7 merely uses the industry standard LCD displays.

 

Here. Let me help you: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/170970-igzo-display-tech-finally-makes-it-to-mass-market-ipad-air-now-high-res-laptops-and-desktops-next

  • Like 1

Lmao. How is thee iPad air display "vastly inferior" to the Nexus 7? Because it has a lower pixel density lol? The iPad uses the new IGZO display, which came out this year and is more energy efficient than a typical LCD display. It also uses a patented chemical coating used to resist skin oil residue. The Nexus 7 merely uses the industry standard LCD displays.

 

Here. Let me help you: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/170970-igzo-display-tech-finally-makes-it-to-mass-market-ipad-air-now-high-res-laptops-and-desktops-next

Agreed.  I have both the Nexus 7 and the iPad, and even if you press your face against the screen, you'd never be able to tell which one has a higher pixel density.  People buy too much into the "higher must be better" mentality that Android loves to brainwash people with.

Security actually is a very very big deal...  Especially since a lot of people do their banking and shopping on their mobile devices.

If security isn't ramped up sooner than later, more than just Android will have malware and virus problems.

There are A LOT of good reasons why everybody should make the transition, and performance is just a bonus.

I know this, but is those security things with 64-bit CPU's something that makes any differences for the normal user today that it is a worty change?

 

I mean, how much more secure does anyone with a 64-bit CPU gets when it's about shooping and banking?

I know this, but is those security things with 64-bit CPU's something that makes any differences for the normal user today that it is a worty change?

 

I mean, how much more secure does anyone with a 64-bit CPU gets when it's about shooping and banking?

Today users don't get any benefit from it (except possibly the latest iDevice users) since they don't have the chips in their devices...

 

Going forward, your question is silly. Obviously, the more secure the platform the better it is for EVERY application.

Today users don't get any benefit from it (except possibly the latest iDevice users) since they don't have the chips in their devices...

 

Going forward, your question is silly. Obviously, the more secure the platform the better it is for EVERY application.

I'm not saying it's not better to have better security. My question is if the security is significant better witch makes it worty to have or just some few % better witch makes it to a hype rather than usefull?

 

If the security is only 5-6% better than it is with a 32-bit CPU, then i don't see the need of getting a 64-bit CPU for smartphones alone just for that. It's an improvement that is so low over how it is normally that i don't think any users would be any more safe then they normally would be in 99.5% of the cases anyways.

i look forward to when the phone is our tower. In front of me at work is my monitor, keyboard and accessories. The same setup at home. When at work my phone plugs into a base unit and is the tower. When I leave work I unlpug my phone from the base unit and head home where I then plug it into my home base unit. 

i look forward to when the phone is our tower. In front of me at work is my monitor, keyboard and accessories. The same setup at home. When at work my phone plugs into a base unit and is the tower. When I leave work I unlpug my phone from the base unit and head home where I then plug it into my home base unit. 

I'm not interested in this... This does seem like a natural evolution of this whole BYOD movement though :s.

 

I don't want work having access to my private data (so I want the devices separate). I also don't want to be responsible for buying the equipment I need for work.

A7 is still an ARM processor, so they're paying a license to ARM.

 

They license the ISA from ARM (an architectural license). They do not license IP cores (i.e. the processor) from ARM. There is a large difference between the two. I was referring to the latter.

  • Like 1

Many of the instructions in x86-64 goes unused as well. 30% of the instructions were used 83% of the time, or something similar to that respect.

 

Agreed and I'm still running a majority of 32-bit programs on my 64-bit processor since the majority of Windows software is 32-bit  :rofl:

I'm not saying it's not better to have better security. My question is if the security is significant better witch makes it worty to have or just some few % better witch makes it to a hype rather than usefull?

 

If the security is only 5-6% better than it is with a 32-bit CPU, then i don't see the need of getting a 64-bit CPU for smartphones alone just for that. It's an improvement that is so low over how it is normally that i don't think any users would be any more safe then they normally would be in 99.5% of the cases anyways.

 

There is no security advantage between an ARMv8 32-bit processor and an ARMv8 64-bit processor at the architectural level. Two people have separately asked for details on the security benefits people keep mentioning and so far we haven't gotten a response. The only feasible argument that can be made here is that it is possible to do better ALSR because of the extended address range. I've actually looked at the architecture and ARM's promotion slides for ARMv8 and there doesn't appear to be anything that indicates that there is a security advantage on the 64-bit front. What they've done is add crypto instructions to the Instruction set architecture (ISA); problem is, those exist in both the 32-bit and 64-bit ISAs variants so you can't make the argument that 64-bit == better security...

 

There are however slight performance benefits when using the 64-bit mode of the processor (most of the time anyway): http://www.anandtech.com/show/7335/the-iphone-5s-review/4

Uh...where are you drawing that conclusion from?  The point is that the amount of memory doesn't matter.

Yes, you can use more than 3.5GB of memory with 64-bit, but that's only one of many advantages.

A major benefit is security.  

 

Educate yourself on why a 64-bit instruction set is very beneficial.  There's a lot of information out there.

I am well aware the benefits of x86-64 and/or the IA-64 architecture.

 

My question is purely on the benefits of ARM 64-bit (AArch64) over current ARMv7*. Please be specific, not some blanket sentence like "major benefit is security."

Lmao. How is thee iPad air display "vastly inferior" to the Nexus 7? Because it has a lower pixel density lol? The iPad uses the new IGZO display, which came out this year and is more energy efficient than a typical LCD display. It also uses a patented chemical coating used to resist skin oil residue. The Nexus 7 merely uses the industry standard LCD displays.

 

Here. Let me help you: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/170970-igzo-display-tech-finally-makes-it-to-mass-market-ipad-air-now-high-res-laptops-and-desktops-next

 

LMAO..conveniently ignoring the fact that the Ipad air has horrible color gamut.  I think around 60-70%.  I notice notice the difference. 

The "Apple effect". Somebody introduces a new tech and everyone talks smack about it and say it'll fail a horrible death. Apple decides to take said tech and incorporate it into their portfolio, all of the sudden people are drooling for it and they (OEMs/customers) are all clamouring to get it. I know that is very generalised but should cover the phenomenon well enough :laugh: take with a grain of salt.

The "Apple effect". Somebody introduces a new tech and everyone talks smack about it and say it'll fail a horrible death. Apple decides to take said tech and incorporate it into their portfolio, all of the sudden people are drooling for it and they (OEMs/customers) are all clamouring to get it. I know that is very generalised but should cover the phenomenon well enough :laugh: take with a grain of salt.

 

 

 

for good  example the iPod  Apple  Made the  MP3 player  what it  was and  by  that i mean they took what others  were doing and perfected  it. before the iPod hardly   noone  much cared or   remembers   the  MP3  players that were  out  because those players were just horrible  very un-user friendly or were  just huge  in size  and would  hold  maby an albums worth  of music while the original iPod could old around or slightly over 1000 songs  

 

 

So  it boils down to the  fact  Apple  made  the products successful because  they knew  how to Make those products  Great  

 

 

 

Before iPod 

867ad36f0af8097dad8351d18b4854a2.jpg?ito

[snipped]

[snipped]

http://www.macrumors.com/2013/11/18/retina-ipad-minis-display-criticized-over-poor-color-gamut-and-accuracy/

 

Off an Apple fanboy site to.  I use some Apple Products, but i have no illusions like yourself about what the true value of them are. [snipped]

[snipped]

http://www.macrumors.com/2013/11/18/retina-ipad-minis-display-criticized-over-poor-color-gamut-and-accuracy/

 

Off an Apple fanboy site to.  I use some Apple Products, but i have no illusions like yourself about what the true value of them are. [snipped]

 

Um, that link is for the iPad Mini, it appeared to me that you guys were talking about the iPad Air so your evidence is neither here nor there (read as: you were talking about the Air). Can you provide evidence that the iPad Air has bad color gamut, bad pixel density, and no new features? Also, that link doesn't address your the claim of poor pixel density even on the mini...

 

Disclaimer: I have never owned any apple products.

another apple android smashing debate. Think there is more to 64bit than just the 4GB ram bit and better speed when doing certain things, playing lemonade tycoon or opening and e-mail app isnt going to be one of them. Although many people have said apple let themselves down by only keeping with 1GB ram with 512MB useable by non system apps cus everything takes twice the address space so probably limited themselves and may get worse performance doing certain things but hey the next iphone has to have something to sell... 2GB ram.

 

Think the 64bit computing for the mobile/finding its way into wearable tech will pay off in 5 years when things need the processing speed of it to do demanding stuff quick in our constantly "connected" world

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!