Recommended Posts

Hello,

You could have posted the review here for Neowin :)

 

Normally, this thread would be locked up, but since the OP has gone through the effort to make this site specifically for this review, I'll leave it up. Mainly because the site design is amazing.

 

Like, truly amazing.

How can you review something, especially an OS, that is in beta?

 

The OS and the Controller may be prototyes, but the actual box is very much final design, so it can be reviewed and benchmarked. And you can easily review beta software, either as an initial launch review or a progressive review, that is continually updated as major content updates are released.

How can you review something, especially an OS, that is in beta?

Huh? What does it being in beta have anything to do with a review?  If you got a Steam Machine and played with it you'd develop an opinion on it.  If you put that opinion to paper, you'd have a review.  If you made it available to others that don't have access to a Steam Machine, beta or otherwise, you'd have an online review.

  • Like 2

The OS and the Controller may be prototyes, but the actual box is very much final design, so it can be reviewed and benchmarked. And you can easily review beta software, either as an initial launch review or a progressive review, that is continually updated as major content updates are released.

 

The hardware isn't final either, all of them are prototypes as Valve don't plan on selling hardware.

The hardware isn't final either, all of them are prototypes as Valve don't plan on selling hardware.

 

Isn't the internal stuff, like the Mobo and Graphics outsourced, or did they make that too (Save graphics, that's nVidia)

Isn't the internal stuff, like the Mobo and Graphics outsourced, or did they make that too (Save graphics, that's nVidia)

 

To be more clear, there isn't much point in reviewing the hardware as said hardware will never be publically available. They don't plan on selling first-party machines.

Hello,

You could have posted the review here for Neowin :)

 

 

Normally, this thread would be locked up, but since the OP has gone through the effort to make this site specifically for this review, I'll leave it up. Mainly because the site design is amazing.

 

Like, truly amazing.

 

I was afraid that may have been the case. I didn't see anything under the posting guidelines and rules so I took the chance.

 

I'm really glad you like the site, though! :)

 

Isn't the internal stuff, like the Mobo and Graphics outsourced, or did they make that too (Save graphics, that's nVidia)

 

Everything is outsourced but the case. Motherboard is ASRock, GPU is Zotac/Nvidia, CPU is Intel (cooler by Zalman), RAM is Crucial, PSU is Silverstone, SSHD is Seagate.

 

To those concerned about how a review can be possible with beta hardware and software:

I don't think it's ever too early for impressions. We review beta versions of Windows, don't we? Most potential buyers and users would like to know what they're getting into before making a decision.

 

Also, based on what I've read in the Steam group discussions and the like, users that weren't selected were interested in impressions and reviews. I think it's fairly obvious that things will change from this point onward. Hardware is hardware. Nothing proprietary here but the case, so if you're familiar with computer components you can take a good guess as to how well any Steam Machine configuration will run. The primary focus at this point is the controller and how well it handles games. The final model will have a touch screen but work almost identically to the prototype. Fair game, if you ask me.

 

I'm finding it a bit odd that people are shunning the idea of reviewing these devices, but to each his/her own.

Nice review and I also agree it is a well designed site  (Y) . It makes reading the review enjoyable. I wish more web designers would make sites like this instead of distracting crap all over the place.

 

Also starting following you on Twitter :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 by Razvan Serea WinToHDD is a handy and useful software which allows you to install or reinstall Windows (Vista/2008 or later) without using a CD/DVD/USB drive. With this All-in-One Microsoft Windows deployment tool, you can easily reinstall Windows, install Windows onto disks other than the one where your Windows is installed, or clone existing Windows installation to other disk. Furthermore, you can use it to create a Windows installation USB containing all your Windows installation ISO files, then you can install Windows (Vista/2008 or later) from the same USB drive on both BIOS and UEFI computers. WinToHDD features: Install/reinstall Windows from ISO, WIM, ESD without using CD/DVD/USB.Improved Clone Windows to another disk without reinstalling Windows, apps.Improved Easily bypass Windows 11 system requirements (TPM 2.0, RAM, internet connection, etc).Improved Encrypt Windows partition with BitLocker when installing or cloning. Install any version of Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista, Server 2008 or later (64 & 32 bits) from same USB drive on both BIOS and UEFI computers. Fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Note: WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 changelog is not yet available. Download: WinToHDD 7.0.2.2 | 36.6 MB (Freemium) Links: Home Page | Free vs Pro Comparison | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Version 19 of ESET's consumer offerings are 64-bit only. The 32-bit installers are for Version 18, which were announced in this Neowin article. In addition to ESET NOD32 Antivirus, ESET Internet Security, ESET Smart Security Premium, and ESET Security Ultimate, both ESET Safe Server and ESET Small Business Security v19.1.14.0 have been released as well. Direct download links: ESET Safe Server (x64) | ESET Safe Server (ARM64) ESET Small Business Security (x64) | ESET Small Business Security (ARM64) Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • I can name 10x that on why not to switch.... It's funny outlook/office are going towards web app wrappers, and then MS is now preaching native apps again.... ugh can we just pick a lane and stay in it
    • Absolutely NOBODY has suggested such a conclusion. I am affirming the sober reality check that AV2's overall market adoption will take longer than AV1's adoption rate -- which, by the way, is the whole point of the article! While PCI-SIG is productive (on paper), other WGs have created all sorts of confusing progress plans that consumers have tuned-out of their improvements... HTML/W3C, USB, HDMI, BT, WIFI (ieee802.11) as a few other groups where spec naming conventions, split progress paths, overlapping ambitions... I'm not critiquing the AV specs group; I'm simply affirming that adoption for AV2 faces headwinds beyond the macroeconomics of it all.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!