The Neowin Digital Photo Gallery


Recommended Posts

Just picked up my first digital camera last night (HP R707). Actually it's my first camera worth over $50 :p . Haven't got to play with it too much yet, just random pics arround my apartment.

Here's one of my cat:

hpim00122fh.jpg

And one of the view from my deck playing with the panorama software:

stitched0014jt.jpg

I'm impressed that the HP R707 can take semi-decent pics, I heard it was a vast improvement to their camera line, but that's actually surprisingly good.

585632429[/snapback]

Yeah, I never would have thought about buying an HP camera. I always thought when I finally got a digital camera, it would be a Canon or Nikon. But I asked here for suggestions and a lot of people were recommending this one. I read the reviews and they were all good and the features just looked awesome for a beginner like me. I couldn't be happier with it. I'm glad I got it over the Canon.

hehe good guess, but its only our rented house for uni, lucky we are not under any flight path/landing path so you cant even hear them :laugh:

hummm 10 miles from Heathrow could be Uxbridge, Harrow, Slough, or maybe near that big Ikea! lol (that almost rhymes)

Oooh very close, South Ruislip maybe? :p

HI!

I've been watching all the pics in this thread and they are all wonderfull!

I love taking pictures too so, I'm going to give you all something in return. :p

This picture was taken with an a Sony DSC F717 digital camera.

But, I still love taking pictures with my Minolta X700 from 1981. :D

Here is the link to my on-line gallery.

http://galerias.escritacomluz.com/anthonws/

Enjoy.

:)

post-82331-1111225629.jpg

HI!

I've been watching all the pics in this thread and they are all wonderfull!

I love taking pictures too so, I'm going to give you all something in return. :p

.

.

Enjoy.

:)

585637673[/snapback]

Hi, your gallery is awesome, but what is that attached picture?!?!

That looks unreal to me... :wacko:

Hi, your gallery is awesome, but what is that attached picture?!?!

That looks unreal to me...  :wacko:

585637693[/snapback]

Hello!

I'm glad that you liked my gallery.

Yes, that photo is real... No digital manipulation.

It was taken on the beach during the sunset.

Those wooden logs are there for physical exercise (you grab on and swing between them).

Sorry if I'm leaving some english errors...

:)

5Mp Image of a Flower, taken in Harrogate, United Kingdom (Today).

http://img234.exs.cx/img234/9703/flowerpower9pr.jpg

Taken using a Canon Digital IXUS 500 5Mp Camera, Macro Mode. Resized to 1024x768 using MS Office 2003's Photo Tool Thingy.

© 2004 William Hook. :blink:

If you want the full 5Mp pic, PM me with your email - it's 1 meg.

My first forray into this forum.. have been borrowing the digital SLR from work (Nikon D70) - man this thing takes some spectacular photo's and I can totally see why these digital SLR's cost more than regular digitals!

Anyway - took this sky shot the other night and thought it looked amazing so thought i'd share :)

redsky.jpg

:no:?:no::?:no:o: Don't show people's licence plates. If I publish something, I would open it in Paint, select the rectangle tool, pick a colour, and drag it over the plate:argue:e:

585652793[/snapback]

Lol, why not? all i got to do is look out my window and see hundreds of plates! why be so secure? i could make one up, OO03 TFH, who owns that ?

EDIT: I tell a lie, no one owns it look. but if i was you i wouldnt bother buying it as i have put it on a public forum.

post-16164-1111491531_thumb.jpg

Lol, why not? all i got to do is look out my window and see hundreds of plates! why be so secure? i could make one up, OO03 TFH, who owns that ?

EDIT: I tell a lie, no one owns it look. but if i was you i wouldnt bother buying it as i have put it on a public forum.

585652799[/snapback]

Just 'cos I got someone sending me lotsa letters, don't want somebody else getting that too. :huh:

All viewable numberplates erased. I'd remove the plates of uncommon cars when putting them on the net, but come to realise there isn't much point when the car in question is a 206. There are bloody loads of them around, so if anyone is going to steal the plate and use it on a similar car they just need to look down the road to find a 206!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!