Recommended Posts

Carl M. Patton is currently serving several life sentences concurrently for murders that occurred in the 1970s. He willingly admits that he has done wrong by committing these acts. His daughter, Tina Mae Patton, is currently on probation for minor offenses. The authorities at Macon State Prison have decided that she can not see her father anymore due to this, even though she has seen him multiple times in the past. There is currently no state law on the books that prevents her from seeing him on the basis of the fact that she is on probation. The warden is standing by his decision to prevent her from seeing her father. The Department of Corrections has basically said that it is a local decision and therefore, there is nothing they can do.

I am asking all my fellow Neowin readers to read Carl's letter and petition the State of Georgia to override the warden and allow Tina Mae Patton the ability to see her father.

 

(Disclaimer: I am an extended family member of Carl Patton, and the son of Tina Mae Patton)

 

Link to Carl's letter: http://www.bit.ly/19xTito

Link to Dept of Corrections website: http://www.dcor.state.ga.us/

Link to State of Georgia site: http://www.georgia.gov

 

I'm not sure I could willingly sign the petition, even if my signature held merit. Just from my understanding of your initial post the warden seems to have decided that Tina's probation isn't serving its purpose, and therefore a stronger measure is needed to make sure that the system does what it was intended to do - deterring people from commiting future crimes. It might sound heartless to you as you have a connection to the case, but that is my understanding of the situation.

I would be interested in reading the father's letter though, is there any chance someone could write it out for us? The cursive writing makes it very difficult to follow, and it may lead me to a different point of view on the situation. For example, I note that at the very top it mentions racism, which your post does not.

EDIT: Odd, trying to do a Google search to get more information brings up nothing. No news articles, no petitions...

Unfortunately I have to side with Nick on this.  I don't know you, or your mother, so I can only go by what I read.  However minor offences or not.. the law was broken and probation was required.  There are reasons the law is in place, and people need to understand that.  This is no different than a child throwing a fit, and losing their TV Privileges.   Now, I am not comparing the two directly, as not seeing a father is worse than losing tv.. but to a child it's just as bad.

I would try again once your Mothers probation has cleared, and is no longer in trouble legally.  I don't think this is just a one off case, and I am sure very very strict precautions are put in place when one law breaking citizen is to meet with another law breaking citizen in a state run facility. 

I am not knocking the chraacter of your mother or grandfather, however they each did something that is not acceptable and are paying the consequences.

  • Like 1

I have to agree with firey and Nick H. Plus if the daughter is on probation obviously something is going wrong where she is either not getting the structure she needs or is getting badly influenced by something/someone. Going to a prison where your father is at after openly admitting he murdered innocent people isn't the best place to get more structure in your life.

The law is a very murky area, and I'm not a lawyer so I'm just going on a quick Google search, but I found this. Note that it was written in 2005, and it does state that the law is ever evolving, but it does state that visitation restrictions are not a violation of the Constitution, and that prisons are allowed to judge situations on a case-by-case basis.

Of course, it could be different from one state to the next, but this is why such things should be discussed with a lawyer, not with your average Joe like me on the Internet. ;)

I think you are all missing the point. The state does not have a right to bar her on the basis of that probation. They can only do it in cases of a parole.

I don't see why it wouldn't.  I mean the state can take children away from parents (CAS or whatever you call it there).. the state can put people in Jail.  I would think they can control who can and cannot see who under state law. 

It's the same premise as stopping your child from hanging out with another child that is a known trouble maker.

I think you are all missing the point. The state does not have a right to bar her on the basis of that probation. They can only do it in cases of a parole.

 

In most places, the warden *does* have the power to restrict visitation unless it's the prisoner's legal counsel. You also didn't respond to my post, so I'm guessing that is the person in question. I can see the warden's point and agree fully with his stance.

IMO If you are on probation you probably should not be allowed to visit someone who is in prison. just as a precaution. You have commited crimes and they cannot work with these things on a case by case basis so its easier to just say no. To prevent criminals from trying to plan things.

I think you are all missing the point. The state does not have a right to bar her on the basis of that probation. They can only do it in cases of a parole.

Setting individual visitation limits may not be in the powers of the state DoC itself, but it IS something at the discretion of the prison warden as he has full authoroty over day-to-day operations. As such he has the power to limit visitations to and by offenders. She is an offender.

Look at it this way: say you had a gang leader and one of his on-parole/probation members wanted to visit. It may be social, or it could be the visitor is passing directions about the running of the gang in his absense.

By restricting such visits you disrupt any chains of command. Who's to say she isn't involved in a criminal conspiracy with her dad?

Preventive medicine.

To be honest, I think you should be tagged, with that kind of lineage I suspect wrongdoing anytime soon!

 

I think you are all missing the point. The state does not have a right to bar her on the basis of that probation. They can only do it in cases of a parole.

 

I think you're missing the point that if anyone I know had committed multiple murders I would have nothing to do with them, no matter how we were related, I suspect other people would feel the same.

 

Happy New Year tho!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!