Recommended Posts

They're working on the phasing quest thing for future updates.

 

If you want to see what they're working on go here for everything they talked about at Quakecon.

 

http://dulfy.net/2014/07/18/eso-quakecon-the-future-of-eso-panel-notes/

 

All of it looks promising. Especially the justice system which will pave the way for the dark brotherhood and thieves guild updates and the spell crafting system.

 

However it's mostly too late because the majority of people who played at launch have moved on. The game shouldn't have been released for at least another 6 months and maybe closer to a year from when it was. People who were looking to get the game on a console should be thanking them for delaying it.

They're working on the phasing quest thing for future updates.

 

If you want to see what they're working on go here for everything they talked about at Quakecon.

 

http://dulfy.net/2014/07/18/eso-quakecon-the-future-of-eso-panel-notes/

 

All of it looks promising. Especially the justice system which will pave the way for the dark brotherhood and thieves guild updates and the spell crafting system.

 

However it's mostly too late because the majority of people who played at launch have moved on. The game shouldn't have been released for at least another 6 months and maybe closer to a year from when it was. People who were looking to get the game on a console should be thanking them for delaying it.

 

I was turned off by the beta and the initial reviews, but I love the ES universe.  My friend and I decided that for $30, we'd check it out for 30 days and see if we liked it.  Wish they would be cheaper than $15/month, but WoW is still that price too.

 

Edit: Looks like quite the over haul.  Not seeing when it lands... surely within this 6 month time frame of the console version.  And I see what you mean about it being good that they waiting on releasing the console version.  Looks like they really took in a lot of player feedback.

I was turned off by the beta and the initial reviews, but I love the ES universe.  My friend and I decided that for $30, we'd check it out for 30 days and see if we liked it.  Wish they would be cheaper than $15/month, but WoW is still that price too.

 

Edit: Looks like quite the over haul.  Not seeing when it lands... surely within this 6 month time frame of the console version.  And I see what you mean about it being good that they waiting on releasing the console version.  Looks like they really took in a lot of player feedback.

 

Some of it's coming soon, like the justice system and spell crafting are slated for their next big update that should be in the next month or so as far as I know. But I don't know that the rest has any time line, just stuff they're working on.

 

I always felt it extremely weird that they decided to launch the game without a proper justice system and the dark brother and thieves guilds. They are such a huge part of the Elder Scrolls universe and could have gone a really long ways towards providing some decent end game instead of just monotonous questing and completely over tuned veteran dungeons that get boring after the first or second time.

 

In another 6 months (assuming the game survives that long) the game will probably be worth a sub fee. But at launch specifically, I don't think it was. I only managed to make it 1 month before I ran out of things to do.

 

Good game but poor decision making by the devs has severely hindered it. Reminds me of Warhammer Online.

Because they weren't essential to the game and every month the game is being developed without sales and subscriptions costs millions. 6 months later without a release would have meant cancel or studio bankruptcy, just not economically feasable. Not MMO can launch feature complete. Heck with modern graphics no MMO is rivaling the functionality of EQ2, SWG or Vanguard. EQ2 probably the only MMO ever to have interesting and engaging crafting, and Vanguard the only one to have politics, and SWG the only one ever to have classes(though it was technically class less) that was completely combat less, like dancer and musicians.

The game looks and feels great to play.  The engine runs smoothly and the UI is really nice compared to Skyrim.  I really appreciate being able to turn the UI scaling all the way up to children's story book levels (especially after playing some old skool Morrowind this weekend).

 

Seems like a great foundation for a good game.  If they can keep paying the developers on it, and keep listening to player feedback (which it seems like they are at least attempting to do), then it has some potential I think.  The fact that they are moving forward on a console release and have a schedule for release on console (although delayed) tells me that they won't be tossing in the towel anytime soon.

  • 2 weeks later...

This game is OK.  I'm getting more "hooked" on it, and getting "lost" in the world.  I do like that there are lots of small things to do just off the path that are not obvious.  The crafting system is also very engaging, and I still have not mastered it.

 

I'm having a lot of difficulty with keeping my Sorcerer alive in some areas.  My buddy who has been playing a Templar has had no issues w/s/e.  I'm fine with the challenge (as WoW has none when it comes to leveling), but I suspect there are some class balance issues.  Then again, it could just be the way I'm spec'd.

 

What bothers me the most about the game right now is how terrible the vast majority of NPCs look.  Almost all of the female NPCs look like surprised drag queens.  I'm glad that they are addressing this in the next patch.  The "artist" who thought that these NPCs models looked good needs to fired and needs to go into another line of work or something.  The mangers and producers who reviewed that "artist's" work and approved it should probably be fired as well.

 

There was one quest line early on in the game where you catch-up to an NPC at various parts in the quest progression.  Every time you go to the NPC in a new spot, she is wearing something completely different.  Lol.  Really?  That makes no sense.  Let me see if I can find the quest line.

I feel like I'm in an empty room talking with myself.

 

Must say, I'm pretty addicted to this game now.  Once I got past what it was "missing" from Skyrim and WoW, I really started focusing on what this game "has".  One area that is definitely a huge improvement over Skyrim and previous Elder Scrolls games is that there is no more save/load system. I always hated the obsessive quicksave/quickload nature of previous Elder Scroll games.  Another aspect I like much more in ESO than in Skyrim is the combat system is so much better defined. There are actual melee abilities, unlike Skyrim that focused primarily on magic and shouts. I'm a little confused why they decided to go with Magik use for the melee abilities, but at least they have them.  Potions cannot be "chugged" continuously so more strategy goes into using potions.  Food (IMHO) is more-or-less in previous Elder Scrolls games for role playing, but ESO moves the tasks of previous "fortify" potions to food/provisions. Overall, the crafting system is really engaging.

 

There is also a lot of different activities just off the path in ESO.  So many reviews slam ESO for being linear, and I'm having a hard time agreeing with that assessment. If you just walk in a direction in ESO, you'll find something to do that the game did not directly lead you to in a linear way.

 

I still have some gripes concerning group play... the game feels like a solo game, and I'm enjoying it as a solo game.  My understanding is that the group play is more significant at higher levels, so I look forward to that.

Played it for a bit but kept getting a bug that it lost all the quests I was on whenever I went into an instance, If I went and found the quest giver and got the quests back it would have my progress but after about the 5th time of having it happen I got a little sick of trying to track down all the quest givers again and gave up on the game for now.   Was fun but a bit annoying bug wise, may give it a try again in a year and see if they have it running a bit smoother.

I haven't had issues with a bug like that.  A huge patch just landed today (about 2.6 - 2.7GB worth of stuff). Quite a bit of new stuff coming according to the presentation they gave at Quakecon. I would expect most of this stuff to be implemented prior to the console game launch in about 6 months...

Played it for a bit but kept getting a bug that it lost all the quests I was on whenever I went into an instance, If I went and found the quest giver and got the quests back it would have my progress but after about the 5th time of having it happen I got a little sick of trying to track down all the quest givers again and gave up on the game for now.   Was fun but a bit annoying bug wise, may give it a try again in a year and see if they have it running a bit smoother.

 

I suspect you didn't lose or drop the quests, but rather it stopped tracking them.

I suspect you didn't lose or drop the quests, but rather it stopped tracking them.

on one of the quests as you finish more of it it unlocks buildings in the town, I came back to the town after one instance and every building was locked again and the place looked like when I first got there, once I went to the quest giver and got the quest back all the buildings and vendors were "phased" in again.

There are actual melee abilities, unlike Skyrim that focused primarily on magic and shouts.

 

One of my primary issues with ESO was that melee combat felt like it took a back-seat to powers. Just hitting things with your sword and moving around... being an effective melee combatant didn't seem to matter and did very trivial damage. I played Skyrim for the melee combat which still seems to be the best first person melee simulation outside of Chivalry. And yet, ESO transferred all the power out of your hits into standard MMO pattern powers.

One of my primary issues with ESO was that melee combat felt like it took a back-seat to powers. Just hitting things with your sword and moving around... being an effective melee combatant didn't seem to matter and did very trivial damage. I played Skyrim for the melee combat which still seems to be the best first person melee simulation outside of Chivalry. And yet, ESO transferred all the power out of your hits into standard MMO pattern powers.

 

I'll have to make it a bit further before I can form more of an opinion about it, but it has my attention for now. Overall I still think Skyrim is a better game, and I've logged a ridiculous amount of hours playing it (over 300 in Steam, and I had it on XBox 360 before that).  One thing I miss is the gore. Skyrim had decent gore and that has been stripped out of ESO.

 

I hope that ESO never becomes that popular though, to be honest. If it did Bethesda may decide to stick with online only going forward.

  • 2 weeks later...

I cancelled my subscription yesterday. Had two characters in their "teens" so didn't get to see the entire game but this is why I canceled:

* Played Skyrim for a bit and am just taken away by how much better the whole game feels compared to ESO.

* Hated the limited inventory/bank space on ESO. Hated that my characters shared the same bank stash in ESO (even though different factions). Too much uncertainty on what is useful and what is not in terms of crafting.  It all seemed useful to me, especially the provision mats which take up the most space. Crafting takes more time than it should due to the lack of inventory space and the constant need to "work on crafting" as part of inventory space management.

* Ultimately the monthly sub cost is too high. I'd hate to see them go f2p with some p2w or pay to wear a hat model, but $15/month is asking too much from casual players. I think WoW is too expensive as well.

* Multiplayer felt disconnected outside of dungeons. Beyond multiplayer combat, the game didn't feel like I was playing with a buddy (especially when we had to perform the same in-game tasks to complete quests). This really killed the immersive gameplay style of previous ES games for me.

* Slow action performance made the game feel very laggy. Opening doors sometimes took multiple "E" strokes before the character animation (which looks terrible) finally occurs. Same with looting some things and talking with some people. A lot of times I thought, "well, maybe I'm off target" and clicked again only to find that it was just lagged or something. Combat feels snappy and fine, so not sure if Internet latency related or still non-ideal performance bugs in the engine.

 

 

ESO is made by Zenimax, not Bethesda. How will it does will likely have little effect on future Elder Scrolls games.

 

I hope not. Bethesda still profits from ESO, and where there is money there is influence. I have a small fear that if ESO takes off and becomes a big money maker then Bethesda may not want to release a game that competes with the same audience... I find that highly unlikely, but still consider it possible.

 

I hope not. Bethesda still profits from ESO, and where there is money there is influence. I have a small fear that if ESO takes off and becomes a big money maker then Bethesda may not want to release a game that competes with the same audience... I find that highly unlikely, but still consider it possible.

 

Zenimax owns bethesda, Zenimax decides what bethesda will make in the future. 

I hope that ESO never becomes that popular though, to be honest. If it did Bethesda may decide to stick with online only going forward.

This is my fear as well. How many Warcraft games have come out since WoW became popular? As HawkMan mentioned Zenimax owns both studios and while they are two different sets of developers I can see the parent company cutting the single player Elder Scrolls if the MMO is raking in the money.

I also strongly disagree with the current pricing scheme. I don't think subscription MMOs are dead but I don't think paying $60 up front then $15/month on top of that makes sense. Either have it a $60 game with no subscription and charge for Expansion packs like Guild Wars or make the game software a free download and charge a subscription fee with expansions included in the subscription. If you take the second option then if you're charging $60 for the game on disc then include 4+ months with it.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!