• 0

Firebird VS Opera


Which do you prefer for everyday use?  

204 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you prefer for everyday use?

    • Opera
      57
    • Firebird
      147


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Meaning Opera does not render pages as well as FB? :sleep:

No, in some cases it does not. I'm a web developer, so I test extensively on all browsers, and I have experienced anomalies in Opera on occasion when they appear fine in both FB and IE.

However, I still appreciate Opera. I used it for a very long time. Now, however, FB is my primary browser. I didn't understand what all the hype was about it being so fast at first -- I didn't think it was any faster than IE or Opera. But then I applied these tweaks ( link ) and it made ALL the difference. FB flies now when loading pages. It's incredible. All I need is 3 extensions to get everything how I want. And with the right theme, I think FB looks better than Opera too. Clean, streamlined. FB is my choice. :D

post-12-1070210528.jpg

  • 0

I?ve always found Opera to render pages faster than Firebird. On Broadband I don?t see any difference, but on dial-up Opera is the fastest browser ever! I don?t really like the mail-part of Opera, however this can be disabled by deleting the m2.dll in the Opera folder.

I still choose Firebird though, eventhough I find it slower and more bugged than Opera. The reason? I HATE that Opera doesn?t support native Windows skinning. The original Opera skin is just plain ugly, and it?s just too much work making a new skin for every time I change my desktop.

With native skinning support, Opera would be a winner. Until then I?ll stick with Firebird.

  • 0

Funny how people say that its not a fair poll when I just asked what is your preferred primary browser.

Besides, despite being a somewhat buggy and beta browser, Firebird has some fundamentals that still maintain peoples favor even over a mature but what I find a "bloated feeling" and not so streamlined browser that is Opera. Firebird 1.X is gonna kick the crap outta it.

  • 0
I switch back and forth between Opera, Firebird and Internet Explorer. Just depending on my mood.

I downlloaded the latest build of firebird and am using it now, but probably going to switch back to opera when I am done typing this.  Why because that pic by XP_2003 is so tasty and I a sick of not being able to see my text curser (the blinking line) it just disappears at random. Don't know why but it does.

In short Firebird is great but just not stable enough.

edit/ I feel sometimes alot of people use Firebird just because its the "thing" and your not cool and 1337 if you don't use it.

i used to NOT use it becasue it was the thing. I tried it once in the .61 days then switched back to ie because i didnt know about themes or extenions or how to get them and i didnt really care about tabbed browsing. But about 2 months ago I decided to seriously try it again and i was much better with computers at this point and forund themees browsers and customized firebird and havent gone back sense.

IMO. Opera is a pretty nice browser but it being paid turns me off and it just doesnt feel as stable and seems like eye candy to me. You have to have it as large images or it looks bad for example. I like eye candy to a bit sense i use the coffee firebird theme but it still keeps it in a small space and makes it look Professional and easy to use.

  • 0

dont like opera its page rendering seems to be the worst

can't even tell if it supports wc3 standards properly as it seems to be a cross between Mozilla and internet explorer page rendering wise

and a lot of sites i've been onto dont display properly in Opera , but in mozilla they render perfectly

  • 0

Yes, the Mozilla-based rendering engine in Firebird is much better than that of Opera's. People post that they see more badly rendered pages using Opera than Firebird in the other forums out there.

When Firebird becomes the standard Mozilla-based browser, it will be the biggest competitor to IE bar none. Thats just the plain truth, people.

  • 0
I prefer Opera at this stage.

One thing, maybe someone can answer as i havent been able to find the solution in ANY forums or whatever.

How do i move the Firebird Temp Net Files/Cache to a location of my choice?

Specify where to store the cache

To specify in which folder the cache is stored, add the following code to your user.js file:

// Path to Cache folder:

user_pref("browser.cache.disk.parent_directory","C:\\Path To Cache");

Remember to use two backslashes for the path separators if you're using Windows, e.g. C:\\Path\\Path To Cache instead of C:\Path\Path To Cache.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

user.js

This is the main preferences file for Mozilla Firebird and is located in your profile folder. The file does not exist by default, so you need to create it before you can start adding your preferences.

Windows users: If you know how to create a file, just skip this section. Before you can create the file, you must make sure that you can see the file type extensions in Windows. Start Explorer (just click on the My Computer icon on your desktop) and select File > Tools > Folder Options.... Click the View tab and uncheck the Hide extensions for known file types option. Now, go to your profile folder and select File > New > Text Document. The default name New Text Document.txt should be displayed. Change the name to user.js (click Yes on the file type warning that appears).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This will do until the option is added to Firebird in a post 1.X version.

  • 0
Specify where to store the cache

To specify in which folder the cache is stored, add the following code to your user.js file:

// Path to Cache folder:

user_pref("browser.cache.disk.parent_directory","C:\\Path To Cache");

Remember to use two backslashes for the path separators if you're using Windows, e.g. C:\\Path\\Path To Cache instead of C:\Path\Path To Cache.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

user.js

This is the main preferences file for Mozilla Firebird and is located in your profile folder. The file does not exist by default, so you need to create it before you can start adding your preferences.

>post snipped<

I just want to thankyou for that post.

I have been trying to find it but failed or too many search results.

Many thanx man, much appreciated.

:D

  • 0

you can't really compare version numbers, because open source software almost always goes up in version number A LOT slower than closed source. Open source projects like the Apache webserver have been around longer than Microsoft's IIS, but IIS is on 6 and apache is on 2. see how that works?

anyway, it's all about the firebird.

  • 0
OK got another question

Using Firebird, how do i clear the cache when the browser closes like in IE?

Ye si have tried searching.

http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&lr=&ie=...mozillazine.org

Sorry, no option to do that just yet...Hmmm.

I checked with the Firebird devs and the better way to do this for broadband users is just to set the cache size to 0 so its not used. Clearing the cache on every exit just slows things down, they say, and Firebird is all about streamlining.

Edit. Multizilla does this, but its only for Mozilla right now. The devs say "There is currently no support for MozillaFirebird, yet. That will change soon, however."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!