• 0

Firebird VS Opera


Which do you prefer for everyday use?  

204 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you prefer for everyday use?

    • Opera
      57
    • Firebird
      147


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would rather use Firebird instead of Opera, but Firebird (because it's still beta) crashes a lot on my machine. When I open a lot of tabbed windows, it usually crashes after a while. Opera has never crashed on me like that, and it's almost as fast, but I've noticed Firebird does display pages more quickly, but I'm talking like fractions of a second, because just about every browser loads pages instantly with my broadband connection. Sometimes images load slower with Opera and IE than with Firebird. I find the best browser for my needs, however, to be Avant Browser. The tabbed interface in Avant is by far the most effecient. Even in Opera, it is noticable there is a limit to how many tabs you can have open before things start bogging down. Avant never bogs down on me at all. Firebird also bogs down A LOT when I have a bunch of tabs open. I'm sure Firebird will be superior to both browsers once it has matured, but right now, in this case, I think Opera is more stable and so I end up using it more often, but my preferred default browser is Avant.

  • 0
OK got another question

Using Firebird, how do i clear the cache when the browser closes like in IE?

Ye si have tried searching.

http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&lr=&ie=...mozillazine.org

There's an extension to do that. I forgot the name, but check the extensions page.. I'm 100% sure there's one.

  • 0

I like Opera better than Firebird. Don't get me wrong, I love Firebird but it just needs a few more things before it becomes the browser of choice for me. Although Firebird feels more responsive and faster, Opera is indeed more customizable and it has my favorite feature: start from last session! Not only that, but in Opera you can move your tabs around in the order that you want. You can't do that in Firebird yet.

All in all, Firebird is a great browser, but Opera is better (right now) :happy:

  • 0
I would rather use Firebird instead of Opera, but Firebird (because it's still beta) crashes a lot on my machine. When I open a lot of tabbed windows, it usually crashes after a while. Opera has never crashed on me like that, and it's almost as fast, but I've noticed Firebird does display pages more quickly, but I'm talking like fractions of a second, because just about every browser loads pages instantly with my broadband connection. Sometimes images load slower with Opera and IE than with Firebird. I find the best browser for my needs, however, to be Avant Browser. The tabbed interface in Avant is by far the most effecient. Even in Opera, it is noticable there is a limit to how many tabs you can have open before things start bogging down. Avant never bogs down on me at all. Firebird also bogs down A LOT when I have a bunch of tabs open. I'm sure Firebird will be superior to both browsers once it has matured, but right now, in this case, I think Opera is more stable and so I end up using it more often, but my preferred default browser is Avant.

No offense or anything, dude, but Avant Browser is an IE shell. It basically a sort of front end for IE which adds Opera and Firebird type functionality but it is still IE.

Says on your profile you're a web dev, so I'm almost sure you know this, but in case anybody sees your post, I just want to make clear that "browsers" like Avant Browser and MyIE2 are just shells for IE, meaning its not "another browser" that you are using. I prefer Firebird so I am not restricted to using the IE engine, which isnt really standards compliant to begin with. Soon as it hits 1.0 and matures further, its going to be what Safari is for the Mac, a powerhouse and a direct competitor to Internet Explorer.

  • 0
No offense or anything, dude, but Avant Browser is an IE shell. It basically a sort of front end for IE which adds Opera and Firebird type functionality but it is still IE.

Says on your profile you're a web dev, so I'm almost sure you know this, but in case anybody sees your post, I just want to make clear that "browsers" like Avant Browser and MyIE2 are just shells for IE, meaning its not "another browser" that you are using. I prefer Firebird so I am not restricted to using the IE engine, which isnt really standards compliant to begin with. Soon as it hits 1.0 and matures further, its going to be what Safari is for the Mac, a powerhouse and a direct competitor to Internet Explorer.

Yes, I know Avant uses the IE engine to display pages. I prefer the IE engine to Opera's, and I prefer the Mozilla engine over IE, but I really don't like using the Mozilla suite, and Firebird crashes a lot right now and for me renders it useless compared to browsers that do not crash. I like the IE engine, but MS has fallen behind on the tabbed browsing and popup blocking and things of that nature, so I use Avant. At least you didn't assume I'm an idiot, and instead assumed I just knew that and didn't say it already; thanks for that :yes:

  • 0

Ok ,lol, I think we all agree on at least one thing; Opera or Firebird is a thousand times better than IE and anything out there. Again as I stated, I use both in heavy rotation, because they are both very solid browsers. Oh, thanks to the person that posted the about:config turbo start thing for Firebird, it works!:)

  • 0

Well, standards compliance is one thing, Angel. Firebird displays pages better (and faster, least for me) on more occasions than Opera. I admit that Opera has more options, but the purpose of this thread was to find out what people like between the two and what they prefer to use, not whether the other one is better. Remember, while Firebird is awesome and running the superior Mozilla engine, its still an XUL based browser that is still very beta compared to Opera, so it will crash for some people on occasion and such. Till Firebird 1.0 hits, or actually, well beyond that, most likely Firebird 2.0, its really tough to make an option-by-option comparison between the two without being fair.

  • 0
Can u tell me what firebird has that opera doesn't..Plz don tell me about pluginz..what can firebird do that opera cant..without any pluginz..

firstly they're called extensions. Seconly your comparing it without them is like saying "Please tell me what mail features Opera has without mentioning M2." You dont compare a browser with its main feature to make it imporved to another browser without using that feature in the first one. By Itself firebird isn't as good imo but with a good skin and some basic extenions it soars way past Opera.

  • 0

Indeed. Opera has no extensions/plugins, that's why its not going to go far. If you want a feature in Opera, you twiddle your thumbs and hope that the Opera team will implement it. If you want a feature in Firebird, you make your own extension and you have it.

Far greater power.

  • 0
Can u tell me what firebird has that opera doesn't..Plz don tell me about pluginz..what can firebird do that opera cant..without any pluginz..

Firebird supports Ms Themes and is free (already mentioned that but still :p)

  • 0

opera is my sweetheart.... but i still use firebird sometimes

i don't understand how some people say opera is bloated. opera installer without java is only 3+ megs while firebird zipped is about 6+ megs... when i run opera it takes about 20-30 megs RAM while firebird takes 30-40 megs with only 1 extension installed.

still i think firebird is a great browser.. it's my backup for sites that don't work well with opera

  • 0

Besides the download size issue, Opera to me has many advantages over Firebird, enough for me to pay for it.

The point about extensions is moot, mainly because the major extensions that are primarily used in Firebird ( TBE, mouse gestures ) come with Opera, and because they are integrated, they don't break every time you update a major version.

  • 0

Firebird , without a doubt , installed about 6 months ago and havent really looked back

BUT

Setting up Java/Flash plugins requires manual work in firebird (not really a problem for me but I can't imagine less experienced users liking it)

For those of you who make the point of firebird being pre-release at present bear in mind that the version number doesnt really tell you how stable it is , since its a non commercial application there's no real rush to slap a nice version number on it to bump up sales, it's also based on mozilla's gecko engine which is probably the most mature and stable in the business. It also has allot of ex-netscape development experience at its disposal and while you can say what you like about netscape/AOL there is allot of know-how available for the tapping

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!