Recommended Posts

Russia -yes

China -yes

Uk - you're having a laugh.

UK a definite yes with Reaction Engines Ltd.

http://www.reactionengines.co.uk

Their SABRE dual mode (one mode air breathing, the other stored LOX) rocket engine and Skylon single stage to orbit spaceplane is getting funding from the UK and European Space Agency.

The key technology, a high performance air precooler, was proven last year.

They also have a brand new co-development agreement with the US Air Force Research Laboratory's Aerospace Systems Directorate.

Skylon-Sabre-technology.jpg

UK a definite yes with Reaction Engines Ltd.

http://www.reactionengines.co.uk

Their SABRE dual mode (one mode air breathing, the other stored LOX) rocket engine and Skylon single stage to orbit spaceplane is getting funding from the UK and European Space Agency.

The key technology, a high performance air precooler, was proven last year.

They also have a brand new co-development agreement with the US Air Force Research Laboratory's Aerospace Systems Directorate.

Skylon-Sabre-technology.jpg

In theory, yes.

 

But nothing that has been used as of yet.

Their timeline is for a ground engine test that if successful ESA has said would be "a critical milestone in the development of this program and a major breakthrough in propulsion worldwide."

That testbed is under construction with funding from the UK, and if it is successful more money will flow from multiple sources.

This has the potential to be every bit as revolutionary as Frank Whittle's turbojet engine, so saying the UK has no major space development is very shortsighted..

Their timeline is for a ground engine test that if successful ESA has said would be "a critical milestone in the development of this program and a major breakthrough in propulsion worldwide."

That testbed is under construction with funding from the UK, and if it is successful more money will flow from multiple sources.

This has the potential to be every bit as revolutionary as Frank Whittle's turbojet engine, so saying the UK has no major space development is very shortsighted..

 

I'm not saying there is no space development in the UK, just that the government puts next to nothing in, and very few others put anything in.

 

I wish we did put more in.

If Nasa are letting others go mine on the moon then there clearly can't be anything worth mining on the moon or the US Government would have it to themselves

 

They're not "letting" others go; they couldn't stop anyone if they tried. They're offering technical assistance to people who want to go and mine.

  • Like 1

Rockets are not the only measure of a nations space program as they are now a commodity for most purposes.

The UK is a member of ESA, has flown astronauts to the ISS, is the home of Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd. (SSTL - a satellite builder) and is also the base of Virgin Galactic - part of the Virgin Group. Tests and development in the US southwestern desert, but a British owned company.

Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo will fly payloads for NASA and other nations & universities, and its White Knight mothership will also carry LauncherOne, an orbital launcher. Both of its Newton liquid fueled engines are deep in development and have done test burns, NewtonOne a full mission burn. Quite impressive, and an even larger NewtonThree engine is in the pipeline.

Goal: an intercontinental suborbital transport, and orbital capability.

Then there is Skylon, which is a hot topic in aerospace circles because of the SABRE engine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!