Graphic card advice


Recommended Posts

So I'm looking at these two, the Sapphire Toxic R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 With Boost and the Sapphire R9 4GB GDDR5 With Boost & OC (would love to post the links but copy paste is broken on  the forums when using IE11...). Would the extra two gigs of ram be something that I don't want to miss out on or should I go with the cheaper of the two that has a faster clocked core and ram?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1200225-graphic-card-advice/
Share on other sites

From what I remember, the extra ram doesn't really make much difference, someone posted that it was mostly a gimmick, (I'm going by my own memory and don't fully remember the details of what was said, or in which thread)

I'll vote for the more powerful gpu unit, unless cost is not an issue of course :)

Depends... If you plan on using a multi-monitor setup and/or high res screens then the 4GB would definitely benefit you more. If you're on a budget then I think the cheaper one is the obvious winner.

So I'm looking at these two, the Sapphire Toxic R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 With Boost and the Sapphire R9 4GB GDDR5 With Boost & OC (would love to post the links but copy paste is broken on  the forums when using IE11...). Would the extra two gigs of ram be something that I don't want to miss out on or should I go with the cheaper of the two that has a faster clocked core and ram?

 

According to the following site, the R9 4gb is ranked at no.5 and the r9 2g is No. 31

http://www.overclock.net/t/502403/graphics-card-ranking-5th-time-and-last-updated-daily

 

you didn't give the full model of the 4gb one so I may be incorrect...

 

that said my own is ranked at 87 and I can run every game i've tried maxed out :)

For gaming currently with 2 GB VRAM you can safely do 1440p (single) with all bells and whistles to maximum, including post-AA (BF4, FC3 and Metro being the today's benchmarks). Future games may (will, in fact) change it, but then - with 270X it will not matter because it won't be powerful enough as it is. For multiple monitors (assuming 1080p), once again, 270X will not be powerful enough to handle the drawing itself (lest you sacrifice other settings), so I'd wager it isn't worth it.

 

Also, usually these doubled VRAM models have lower clocks - take special note on specs - otherwise what you'd gain long term (and that's a big if), you'll lose all the while before you get there.

You are asking us to speculate on which card would be a better without the actual specs. We don't know the clock-rates/memory rates/etc. of the cards and such so it's really impossible to see which would be better in practice. Personally, I think the only reliable indicator would be look up benchmarks for the cards but I don't feel comfortable guessing which card you are looking at and such without more information.

So I'm looking at these two, the Sapphire Toxic R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 With Boost and the Sapphire R9 4GB GDDR5 With Boost & OC (would love to post the links but copy paste is broken on  the forums when using IE11...). Would the extra two gigs of ram be something that I don't want to miss out on or should I go with the cheaper of the two that has a faster clocked core and ram?

Assuming both are 270X, the 4GB is a gimmick. The 270X doesn't have the power to drive the resolutions where 4GB would be beneficial: AMD specced it at 2GB because that's what it needs.

  • Like 2

I'll try to get you guys specs here later, like I said I wanted to do direct links but IE11 and our forums aren't to friendly with each other and I'm not getting the beat reception on my phone right now.

  • Like 1

So on the R9 270X 4GB GDDR5 With Boost & OC the GPU is at 1020 MHz and the memory 5600 Mhz. On the Toxic R9 270X 2GB GDDR5 With Boost the GPU is 1100 MHz with the memory at 6000 MHz. Those and the Toxic model having three fans instead of two are the only differences.

From what I remember, the extra ram doesn't really make much difference, someone posted that it was mostly a gimmick, (I'm going by my own memory and don't fully remember the details of what was said, or in which thread)

I'll vote for the more powerful gpu unit, unless cost is not an issue of course :)

I can confirm that. I have a junk GPU and it's 1.5GB VRAM don't help a bit. For instance I have had an older model with more powerful GPU, only 320MB VRAM and it performed way better :)

 

And by the way 2GB of VRAM are just fine, 4GB is wasted money imo... Unless you wanna play Battlefield 4 maxed out on triple monitors.

  • Like 1

There's absolutely no need to buy the 4GB version over the 2GB one. You won't get any extra performance, even at higher multi-monitor resolutions. Go for the 2GB version and as someone who owns an ASUS R9 270X DirectCU II TOP, I can say that it performs very nicely.

  • Like 1

Yup, you made the right choice given that they were both 270X. Definitely, the higher clock was better in this case -- not the additional RAM. Had it been a choice of different cards, it wouldn't have been so clear cut

Good to know I made the right choice. Thanks guys for all your help.

Yup, you made the right choice given that they were both 270X. Definitely, the higher clock was better in this case -- not the additional RAM. Had it been a choice of different cards, it wouldn't have been so clear cut

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
    • If you have an account with any of Meta's services, you technically have an account with all of their services. You may not use it, but it exists.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!