Recommended Posts

The things i'd do to this woman to make that smile go away :shifty:

She has a fantastic smile. The things I'd do to this woman to keep that smile.. cause she'd be enjoying said cause. lol. :laugh:

She has a fantastic smile. The things I'd do to this woman to keep that smile.. cause she'd be enjoying said cause. lol. :laugh:

Oh no... you won't see her smile when she's sitting on....  or even,  you don't moan and smile.... :shifty: (well some crazies do, but lol).

  • Like 1

I think it looks really good...not as good as T2 but still pretty good. I think you guys are over stepping it from a story stand point when you have to remember they are bouncing around in time travel so something is bound to change or alter.

I think it looks really good...not as good as T2 but still pretty good. I think you guys are over stepping it from a story stand point when you have to remember they are bouncing around in time travel so something is bound to change or alter.

 

My problem is that it seems like a really cheap way to play on your nostalgia. I mean, Arnold even says he'll be back. That's the definition of cheap, because it followed probably 20 other scenes which were direct references to the first two movies. If you're rebooting it, might offer something new. But this is just a trailer, could be they're doing exactly that just to get people hyped for it and that's why the trailer is chock-full of repeated imagery and lines, and the movie might actually offer something new.

 

 

I'm going to assume everyone who is giving negative feedback is most likely still going to see the movie sometime in their life.

 

Yeah... and?

  • Like 1

hopefully this will be the last one, if not someone needs to do a Format c: /u - a low level format, or pull the plug and make sure it has no UPS, cus seriously this ###### is getting old, trailer makes it look watch able, but I doubt I would drop the sort of cash that is required at a cinema now a days

Have to say it didn't look bad!

It concerns me that they've gone to a lot of effort to stomp all over a lot of the same territory that the old (good) films already covered. The fact that everyone has been recast also irks me. It looks like a Terminator film crossed with a teen coming-of-age movie. Hopefully I'll be wrong, but I'm worried now. Arnold should have stayed out of this one :/.

Graphically though it looked very impressive.

Yeah... and?

 

It's just annoying seeing all these negative comments from people even though their still going to see the movie.

 

Maybe it's just me, but if I say a movie looks bad, I don't even see it unless I'm told otherwise. For example, I refused to watch Dracula Untold until someone told me it was a badass movie which I agreed after I seen it. Then again, Predestination looked stupid and I was told it was good. So I watched it, now I want my time back.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!