Recommended Posts

I liked Salvation, but it should have been its own film, a spin off of the Terminator series rather than a direct reference. It should have been based on a group of humans completely detached from John Conner, just trying to survive.

 

2 movies with silly time travel was enough. They are so dead for ideas that they have to make 4 out of 5 movies to be about time travel, ALWAYS with the same concept of going back in time to kill someone.

2 movies with silly time travel was enough. They are so dead for ideas that they have to make 4 out of 5 movies to be about time travel, ALWAYS with the same concept of going back in time to kill someone.

But that's the core mechanism of the whole story. That's the core mechanic of the Terminator films. There has to be time travel - and I gather that events of the first film have completely messed up every future timeline.

 

I'm not sure why everyone hates on T3 so much. There are some really interesting bits of lore in that film. The ending is a downer sure, but for any of the Terminator films to happen, Skynet has to come alive at some point. Terminator Salvation had some really cool sequences, but I agree it would have been a great standalone film, away from the John Connor lore.

  • Like 2

They did jump, from 1984 to 2017

 

Spoilers in bound..

Which was stupid. If they knew this thing was happening why not go back even earlier and stop it before it's even remotely closed to finished? But I guess that wouldn't be dramatic and make for a good movie.

 

Imagine if they jumped back to 2015 when John said he got there to baby sit Genisys. That's how any logical person would do it if they knew for certain that certain events were going to happen, not go to the last possible minute that you could to stop it. I believe this is called deus ex machina?

 

Hell, they even used this as the kicker for the alternate timeline we see in this movie.

  • Like 1

Spoilers in bound..

Which was stupid. If they knew this thing was happening why not go back even earlier and stop it before it's even remotely closed to finished? But I guess that wouldn't be dramatic and make for a good movie.

 

Imagine if they jumped back to 2015 when John said he got there to baby sit Genisys. That's how any logical person would do it if they knew for certain that certain events were going to happen, not go to the last possible minute that you could to stop it. I believe this is called deus ex machina?

 

Hell, they even used this as the kicker for the alternate timeline we see in this movie.

That's it, we need the time displacement equipment, so we can go back in time and stop James Cameron from ever making The Terminator :p

To be honest they're a guilty pleasure, and I enjoy em, I could take them apart just as quickly, just from the huge craters that were the plot holes in T2, but I really don't really want to overanalyze a piece of celluloid.

  • Like 1

That's it, we need the time displacement equipment, so we can go back in time and stop James Cameron from ever making The Terminator :p

To be honest they're a guilty pleasure, and I enjoy em, I could take them apart just as quickly, just from the huge craters that were the plot holes in T2, but I really don't really want to overanalyze a piece of celluloid.

If you accept the multiverse theory, there's a universe where James Cameron is critiquing your version of Terminator 2. Whoa! :o  

It's not about what makes sense it's about what makes for more action and pew pew and boom on the screen.

 

Can't it be both though? I just have a hard time lately trying to get around the entire "if this happened in reality no one would actually do that" part.

 

I guess this is one of my failings as I'm getting older. 

2 movies with silly time travel was enough. They are so dead for ideas that they have to make 4 out of 5 movies to be about time travel, ALWAYS with the same concept of going back in time to kill someone.

Me thinks you missed day one of terminator movie camp. Time travel IS the main theme behind the movies.

Weird going to movies alone though ha. so i'll probably wait.

Pffft, I go to the movies alone about 98% of the time. It's great! Get to go when I want, much cheaper (especially if you go to a morning show, it's like $4), and its super easy to find a seat. Based on my rewards from my local theater, I have seen 268 movies there solo in the past 6yrs :woot:

On its own, it wasn't really awful. It had like a plot and stuff, and there was some effort put into it. The performances were okayish, and by the end of the movie, I did see both Clarke and Courtney as Sarah and Kyle (especially the Jai guy, he was the biggest turn-off for me, based on Die Hard 5). Arnold was very likeable.

 

But as a Terminator movie, it just feels so redundant. They basically wrote the plot around the fact that they needed a grandpa Terminator and as many possible T1/T2 references. And what was a pretty simple time travel paradox turned into a ridiculous plot device that suits whatever need they might have. One of which also being the fact that they want the next sequel to be set in 'present day' where they left off the characters, which is 2017, which is also presumably the release date for the sequel.

 

All in all, definitely not worth the ticket price.

Saw it yesterday too.  I agree that they should have 'touched up' the old footage rather than reshooting them - the punks were terrible.

 

Overall, I enjoyed it as popcorn summer fare.  It had good effects and boom boom, overall it seemed pretty monotonous.  I did love that we finally got a good future battle, unlike Salvation.  I still hate flash sideways stuff. ;)

 

I didn't stay for the after-credits but assumed there would be something glowing in the ashes.  I'd put it slightly above Salvation at the bottom of the pile.

The Terminator rights revert to James Cameron in 2019, and he likes this one,

The rest of his quote is severe spoilerage so I won't post it, but IMO Cameron is going to use Genisys as the jumping off point for a new series.

Also: Cameron did not like T3 or Salvation.

 

The original director getting his movie rights back isn't always a good thing.  Case in point.. Stargate & Emmerich's plans to completely retcon all three series...

Saw it yesterday too.  I agree that they should have 'touched up' the old footage rather than reshooting them - the punks were terrible.

 

Overall, I enjoyed it as popcorn summer fare.  It had good effects and boom boom, overall it seemed pretty monotonous.  I did love that we finally got a good future battle, unlike Salvation.  I still hate flash sideways stuff. ;)

 

I didn't stay for the after-credits but assumed there would be something glowing in the ashes.  I'd put it slightly above Salvation at the bottom of the pile.

Well if they did retouch, they couldn't have included "you're not going to need any clothes", which was the whole point of that scene.

The original director getting his movie rights back isn't always a good thing.  Case in point.. Stargate & Emmerich's plans to completely retcon all three series...

 

I think he's just continuing from the original movie. The tv show guys retconed it.

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, finally saw this last night, and surprisingly, I didn't hate it.  As a popcorn flick it was fairly good, as a Terminator movie, it... well, you can pretty much forget anything after T2 to be honest (and that's not a bad thing).

 

The one thing that annoyed me though, were some big unanswered questions.

 

Who sent Pops back, why did Pops blow up Connor's parents but not kill her, what are his real reasons?

 

If there are no sequels to Genisys, I hope they at least answer the above!

  • Like 1

Well, finally saw this last night, and surprisingly, I didn't hate it.  As a popcorn flick it was fairly good, as a Terminator movie, it... well, you can pretty much forget anything after T2 to be honest (and that's not a bad thing).

 

The one thing that annoyed me though, were some big unanswered questions.

 

Who sent Pops back, why did Pops blow up Connor's parents but not kill her, what are his real reasons?

 

If there are no sequels to Genisys, I hope they at least answer the above!

 

 

 

that is why  ther is 2 other films to  tie in those questions you had or didnt have or mmmmm

Yes, but ONLY if they make enough from Genisys...

 

Also, there wasn't enough Matt Smith.

+1 they need to make the next movie about matt smith :p

 

Yes, but ONLY if they make enough from Genisys...

 

Also, there wasn't enough Matt Smith.

Well the double their budget vs. ticket sales 

 

Budget $155 million[2] Box office $279.6 million[3]
  • 2 months later...

Finally got around to seeing this last night and after watching the end I could only thing of one thing that anyone in I.T. would know that makes the ending of the movie temporary and that is "D.R".

Any large corporation would have a "Disaster / Recovery" site so if the main location goes down you could get operations up and running again in a few days.  If anything; they just prolonged judgement day by a few days.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!