Recommended Posts

Unless the software in the PS4 is diabolically sloppy and never gets fine tuned (doubt it) then mere software improvements aren't going to make the XO be neck and neck. The power difference is too much.

As noted by many devs, the power difference is minimal. If we thought last gen was a tight performance race, this gen will be even closer.

As noted by many devs, the power difference is minimal. If we thought last gen was a tight performance race, this gen will be even closer.

 

Now you're just flat out lying. The performance difference is huge. Every Xbox One game so far has shown this to be true, as each PS4 game has trounced on them, other than the first party titles.

And how exactly do they plan to magically make dx11 hardware support directx 12 features? Is it going to be similar to how the cloud was supposed to magically transform gaming too?

To think the X1 wasn't developed primarily as a DX12 device considering this news is out 4 months after launch is absurd.
  • Like 2

As noted by many devs, the power difference is minimal. If we thought last gen was a tight performance race, this gen will be even closer.

 

What about the 40% quoted? Last gen was different because the consoles were completely different. Plus it was off-setted. The 360 had a better GPU, the PS3 had a better CPU (Which nobody wanted to optimise for). This gen the hardware is the same type, and the PS4 is using measurably more powerful parts.

 

As I said in a different thread. Hopefully DX12 allows the XO to hit 1080/60 in the demanding games too, so that we can go back to squinting at zoomed in textures like last-gen to declare one version is "better"

This thread makes me lol.  DX12 while yes it will give a boost is not going to magically make the hardware more powerful than the ps4.  It will still have the esram issues, it will still have a weaker gpu, it will still have less ddr ram.  Yes the DX12 may allow it to do some more graphically challenging things while working around whatever limitations are present with the hardware.  However if the PS4 was to get OpenGL updates that are on par with dx12 changes, or optimizations.. as we have seen already the PS4 can out-preform the Xbox.

  • Like 2

As already stated, DX12 is no miracle fix for the issues facing the XB1. Remember what DX10 did for performance and graphical fidelity? Yup, virtually nothing. And the main improvements in DX11 required new hardware, like tessellation. It's also worth pointing out that OpenGL is looking to make the same improvements in reducing CPU load and allowing low-level hardware access, so the performance difference between the consoles is unlikely to change.

 

I just hope that Microsoft's desire for console dominance doesn't holdback PC gaming development, though given the company's contempt for PC gaming I don't have much confidence in that.

As already stated, DX12 is no miracle fix for the issues facing the XB1. Remember what DX10 did for performance and graphical fidelity? Yup, virtually nothing. And the main improvements in DX11 required new hardware, like tessellation. It's also worth pointing out that OpenGL is looking to make the same improvements in reducing CPU load and allowing low-level hardware access, so the performance difference between the consoles is unlikely to change.

 

I just hope that Microsoft's desire for console dominance doesn't holdback PC gaming development, though given the company's contempt for PC gaming I don't have much confidence in that.

 

I have never believed consoles were holding back PC gaming. It's probably because the vast majority of PC gamers don't have the latest bleeding edge tech and it'd be financial suicide for games companies to target that tiny demographic. Obviously there is going to be the occassional exception where developers got lazy and did a horrible port. But thats hardly consoles fault. Competent dev companies have had no trouble making games that scale well with different systems.

I have never believed consoles were holding back PC gaming. It's probably because the vast majority of PC gamers don't have the latest bleeding edge tech and it'd be financial suicide for games companies to target that tiny demographic.

My concern is more that Microsoft will focus most of DX12's development on the XB1 and not focus on advancing gaming on PC, which is what DirectX has historically been about. And there's little doubt that consoles have been holding back PC gaming, as it's about developing for the lowest common denominator. Fortunately there are still plenty of developers who treat the PC platform seriously.

My concern is more that Microsoft will focus most of DX12's development on the XB1 and not focus on advancing gaming on PC, which is what DirectX has historically been about. And there's little doubt that consoles have been holding back PC gaming, as it's about developing for the lowest common denominator. Fortunately there are still plenty of developers who treat the PC platform seriously.

 

The fact remains a vast portion of the people who play on PC don't have cutting edge hardware, often only adequate. Devs are going to try and make sure these people with average PC's can run their game. Whats the point pouring all that money into making the shiniest game in the World if only 12 people can run it?

Xbox 360 shipped with some DirectX 9 improvements, which eventually made their way into DirectX 10. I think we will see a something similar here. DirectX 12 will probably pick up hUMA, mantle like lower level API, tiled textures etc.

This thread makes me lol.  DX12 while yes it will give a boost is not going to magically make the hardware more powerful than the ps4.  It will still have the esram issues, it will still have a weaker gpu, it will still have less ddr ram.  Yes the DX12 may allow it to do some more graphically challenging things while working around whatever limitations are present with the hardware.  However if the PS4 was to get OpenGL updates that are on par with dx12 changes, or optimizations.. as we have seen already the PS4 can out-preform the Xbox.

This thread makes you lol? This post screams of a weird insecurity to a consumer purchase.

 

There's a lot of basic facts which can be laid out which show a lot of big potential in this announcement:

  • MS' investment into AMD. Billions of USD doesn't just get you a slightly custom APU which standard GCN architecture. MS probably worked with AMD very closely to actively develop this APU to support DX12. Keeping in mind the poor performance of DX11 on the box.
  • You don't get a DX major revision every day. This will include a lot of new technology which isn't implemented or seen before. Even, maybe some common libraries to work with calculational off-loading in the cloud which would be insane.
  • A lot of this won't be possible Sony side. A lot of this will take different changes in architecture which has been seen in every DX revision to date. Considering the PS4 doesn't even support DX, more so a wrapper which can emulate some DX features which make it easier for developers. Although that's just another wrapper which decrements performance.
  • Low level work. Its obvious there has been partial low-level support from the get-go but with a real focus on DX implementing this on the PC side now, there will be some real benefits with the more multi-threaded approach on these consoles.

No, suddenly the Xbox is not going to become so powerhouse which locally beats the PS4 astronomically, but software does take hardware a long way. With these changes, you could see some very cool things which aren't possible on the PS4. With Phil also comfortably tweeting about Ray-Tracing aswell, which is insane. I'm very eagerly awaiting what they show at GDC, considering the roll they've been on recently.

This thread makes you lol? This post screams of a weird insecurity to a consumer purchase.

 

There's a lot of basic facts which can be laid out which show a lot of big potential in this announcement:

  • MS' investment into AMD. Billions of USD doesn't just get you a slightly custom APU which standard GCN architecture. MS probably worked with AMD very closely to actively develop this APU to support DX12. Keeping in mind the poor performance of DX11 on the box.
  • You don't get a DX major revision every day. This will include a lot of new technology which isn't implemented or seen before. Even, maybe some common libraries to work with calculational off-loading in the cloud which would be insane.
  • A lot of this won't be possible Sony side. A lot of this will take different changes in architecture which has been seen in every DX revision to date. Considering the PS4 doesn't even support DX, more so a wrapper which can emulate some DX features which make it easier for developers. Although that's just another wrapper which decrements performance.
  • Low level work. Its obvious there has been partial low-level support from the get-go but with a real focus on DX implementing this on the PC side now, there will be some real benefits with the more multi-threaded approach on these consoles.

No, suddenly the Xbox is not going to become so powerhouse which locally beats the PS4 astronomically, but software does take hardware a long way. With these changes, you could see some very cool things which aren't possible on the PS4. With Phil also comfortably tweeting about Ray-Tracing aswell, which is insane. I'm very eagerly awaiting what they show at GDC, considering the roll they've been on recently.

 

Well said Jonny. Not sure what's so funny about this thread, or about the X1. Sure PS4 has a slight power edge but updating to DX12 can only make things better on X1. What's so funny about that?

  • Like 3

What if we able to run xbox os in ps4 to take advantage of the more powerful hardware because the xbox one UI is more nicer and it's awesome if some one port it over to PS4 since the hardware share similar architecture and the only discrepancy is software code. Maybe one day we could choose xbox os or orbis in ps4 and solve exclusive titles  :)

Another thing for me, as much as the misterxmedia blog is full of s*** and provides hours of humorous reads. There's one picture which really strikes my attention:

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/misterxmedia/21549619/105328/105328_original.png

 

I'm not confident with talking silicon but to me, that shows signs that the chip is stacked. Along with:

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/misterxmedia/21549619/105558/105558_original.jpg
 

That is the A6 which is Apples chip which is stacked and shows the same signs. If anyone is good with silicon here can you expand on it? I'd be looking forward to seeing if there is any of this extremely bizarre "secret sauce" which he rants on about.

This thread makes you lol? This post screams of a weird insecurity to a consumer purchase.

 

There's a lot of basic facts which can be laid out which show a lot of big potential in this announcement:

  • MS' investment into AMD. Billions of USD doesn't just get you a slightly custom APU which standard GCN architecture. MS probably worked with AMD very closely to actively develop this APU to support DX12. Keeping in mind the poor performance of DX11 on the box.
  • You don't get a DX major revision every day. This will include a lot of new technology which isn't implemented or seen before. Even, maybe some common libraries to work with calculational off-loading in the cloud which would be insane.
  • A lot of this won't be possible Sony side. A lot of this will take different changes in architecture which has been seen in every DX revision to date. Considering the PS4 doesn't even support DX, more so a wrapper which can emulate some DX features which make it easier for developers. Although that's just another wrapper which decrements performance.
  • Low level work. Its obvious there has been partial low-level support from the get-go but with a real focus on DX implementing this on the PC side now, there will be some real benefits with the more multi-threaded approach on these consoles.

No, suddenly the Xbox is not going to become so powerhouse which locally beats the PS4 astronomically, but software does take hardware a long way. With these changes, you could see some very cool things which aren't possible on the PS4. With Phil also comfortably tweeting about Ray-Tracing aswell, which is insane. I'm very eagerly awaiting what they show at GDC, considering the roll they've been on recently.

 

 

Well said Jonny. Not sure what's so funny about this thread, or about the X1. Sure PS4 has a slight power edge but updating to DX12 can only make things better on X1. What's so funny about that?

What is funny, is that many appear to believe that DX12 will put the xbox infront of the PS4, or be some savior for gaming.. on a game console.  What's funny is that people are now expecting on DX12 to be able to give the same performance that the PS4 is already giving (1080/60).  What's funny is that the xbox didn't launch with the power it should have especially at a higher price point.  Things I find humorous you may not, that's the beauty of individuality.   That and it's being talked about like the PS4 is going to be left in the dust, and that OpenGL can't be updated to match DX.

 

Software can only go as far as the hardware allows, especially when hardware is a concern, and there can be problems trying to push the hardware too far, especially in a form factored design.  

I am not saying DX12 won't bring stuff to the table, nor am I saying it won't give a graphics boost and open some doors, but it's not going to be what wins the console wars, and it's not going to make the xbox lead the pack.  Is it a plus for those that already have it? Sure.. they should be getting the gaming power that it boasts.  

Feel free to disagree.. but In my own personal opinion.. it is not going to make the xbox some insane powerhouse and give it some super edge over the PS4.   The cloud was supposed to do that.. and we haven't seen it yet.

 

What if we able to run xbox os in ps4 to take advantage of the more powerful hardware because the xbox one UI is more nicer and it's awesome if some one port it over to PS4 since the hardware is so similar and the only discrepancy is software code. Maybe one day we could choose xbox os or orbis in ps4 and solve exclusive titles  :)

Yuck, do not want metro on PS4.

  • Like 3

Metro is way better and provide live update for your application. So what's wrong with it? 

I dislike it on Windows 8, would never use Windows Phone.  I just don't like a bunch of tiles filling up my screen. I prefer static icons.  I don't need to see live updates on my PS4.  If I am watching TV or using my PS4.. then I couldn't care less about what people are posting on Facebook, what the weather is, or what games are on sale for me to spend my money on.

I fail to see how metro is way better than the ps4 xmb..  however we are going off topic.. so... yea.

 

Metro is way better and provide live update for your application. So what's wrong with it? 

 

Most Live tiles on the XO don't update or show any information. They just serve the function of being giant static icons that take up a tonne of space.

Another thing for me, as much as the misterxmedia blog is full of s*** and provides hours of humorous reads. There's one picture which really strikes my attention:

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/misterxmedia/21549619/105328/105328_original.png

 

I'm not confident with talking silicon but to me, that shows signs that the chip is stacked. Along with:

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/misterxmedia/21549619/105558/105558_original.jpg

 

That is the A6 which is Apples chip which is stacked and shows the same signs. If anyone is good with silicon here can you expand on it? I'd be looking forward to seeing if there is any of this extremely bizarre "secret sauce" which he rants on about.

I saw that too, but A. Penello once tweeted something like 'No add'l dGPU in Xbox One. System is plenty powerful for now and the future' so right now I'm not sure what to believe. If it DOES contain a stacked GPU, they might be hiding some hardware pieces on purpose for future reveals.

When was the Xbox One NOT a 1080p/60fps console? Last we saw, most of the games on the X1 are 1080p/60fps.


Most Live tiles on the XO don't update or show any information. They just serve the function of being giant static icons that take up a tonne of space.

Yup, both consoles have giant static icons.

I dislike it on Windows 8, would never use Windows Phone.  I just don't like a bunch of tiles filling up my screen. I prefer static icons.  I don't need to see live updates on my PS4.  If I am watching TV or using my PS4.. then I couldn't care less about what people are posting on Facebook, what the weather is, or what games are on sale for me to spend my money on.

I fail to see how metro is way better than the ps4 xmb..  however we are going off topic.. so... yea.

 

I agree that Metro does not improve functionality on the Xbox One as much as it does on Windows or Windows Phone. But it's easy on the eyes; and makes for a very straight-forward interface without clutter. I prefer that by a long shot, but I have no problem with XMB. It's just a different approach to UX design

When was the Xbox One NOT a 1080p/60fps console? Last we saw, most of the games on the X1 are 1080p/60fps.

Yup, both consoles have giant static icons.

 

At least on the PS4 they have small icons for several things. Large icons are reserved for apps and games etc. And source for "most" Xbox games being 1080. Last time I checked it was the minority.

At least on the PS4 they have small icons for several things. Large icons are reserved for apps and games etc. And source for "most" Xbox games being 1080. Last time I checked it was the minority.

Source? Posted numerous times here. Feel free to check out the resolution game thread. You didn't check very hard if you think they are in the minority.

 

PS4 have large and small icons. Mostly large though. X1 have large and small as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!