Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm looking for a PCI-e revision 1 or 1.1 video card for this Intel DG41RQ motherboard.

 

Specs here - http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/dg41rq/sb/CS-029923.htm

 

I can not for the life of me find any video cards that use PCI-e revision 1.1, the lowest seems to be PCI-e 2.0.  Is PCI-e 1.1 also considered 2.0?

 

Thanks for any help on this!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1205125-unable-to-find-pcie-11-video-card/
Share on other sites

I would have thought that since the motherboard is 1.1 it would only support 1.1 or below.  This is not the case though?  And if so, can I purchase a PCIe 3.0 video card?

 

A PCIe 3.0 card would work but not at its full potential since the bandwidth of 1.0 is significantly lower than 2.0 or 3.0. It's very likely that a modern 3.0 card would be bottlenecked by older slower components.

A PCIe 3.0 card would work but not at its full potential since the bandwidth of 1.0 is significantly lower than 2.0 or 3.0. It's very likely that a modern 3.0 card would be bottlenecked by older slower components.

This. It wouldn't honestly be worth it unless you plan on upgrading the motherboard, CPU, maybe the RAM and maybe the PSU too if it's too weak too at some point.

This. It wouldn't honestly be worth it unless you plan on upgrading the motherboard, CPU, maybe the RAM and maybe the PSU too if it's too weak too at some point.

 

Chances are if the machine has a PCI-E 1.1 motherboard (like mine), it's very likely it also has DDR2 RAM in there. Which by extension would mean the RAM would also have to go when it's time for a new build.

 

In my case, for example, I have a GTX 670 which is a PCI-E 3.0 card, and despite that I still have appreciable gains over my previous card.

I would have thought that since the motherboard is 1.1 it would only support 1.1 or below.  This is not the case though?  And if so, can I purchase a PCIe 3.0 video card?

 

Yes, PCI-Express is both fully backwards and forwards compatible (faster cards work in slower slots and vice versa), you can use any PCI Express card you want. It would of course be limited to your 1.1 slots interface speed as mentioned but it will work fine, just slower.

Though, in theory cards should be backwards compatible from 3.0 --> 1.0 in practice that isn't always the case. Sometimes, newer cards just won't function in 1.0 slot. I'd personally only go for a 2.0/2.1 card given that. You stand better chance of the backwards compatibility panning out if you do that.

Though, in theory cards should be backwards compatible from 3.0 --> 1.0 in practice that isn't always the case. Sometimes, newer cards just won't function in 1.0 slot. I'd personally only go for a 2.0/2.1 card given that. You stand better chance of the backwards compatibility panning out if you do that.

 

Sometimes a 3.0 card will have trouble working in a 2.0 slot as well. I had to do a bios update for my motherboard to get my 7850 to work with my board, for example.

Sometimes a 3.0 card will have trouble working in a 2.0 slot as well. I had to do a bios update for my motherboard to get my 7850 to work with my board, for example.

That's a good point, most of the time it probably is an issue with the mobo when there are issues and for that reason you are much less likely to see updates to fix issues if you are spanning multiple revisions. I.e. it's probably more reliable to go from 3.0-->2.0 or 2.0-->1.0 than from 3.0-->1.0.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!