Recommended Posts

List of "Value GPU" candidates 

 

I have noticed that sometimes people that don't want to spend a fortune on a GPU card end up getting a recent model low-end card from a model selection that is designed to trap consumers into getting very poor value.

 

In most cases, an older model more capable GPU at the same price will provide much more value.

 

For this initial attempt at a Neowin Reference, I have only included NVIDIA models, but if there is any interest I can update with AMD information.

 

UPDATE: to be part of NVIDIA's current driver updates, any NVIDIA GPU needs to be 600 series or later. 

 

I am also interested in getting pricing feedback from various geographical regions in order to see the sweet spots in value.

 

 

List of common mid-range/affordable cards

sorted in order of performance

(a few higher cards included for reference)

 

1070 Ti - 12260 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+1070+Ti

 

980 Ti - 11322 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?id=3218

 

1070 - 11056 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?id=3521

 

980 - 9577 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?id=2953

 

 

Under 10000

 

780 Ti - 8888 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+780

 

1060 - 8842 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+1060

 

1060 3GB - 8781 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+1060+3GB

 

970 - 8582 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+970

 

780 - 7971 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+780&id=2525

 

1060 with Max-Q Design - 6710 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+1060+with+Max-Q+Design&id=3769

 

 

Under 6000

 

770 - 6089 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+770

 

960 - 5805 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+960

 

1050 Ti - 5802 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+1050+Ti

 

680 - 5683 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+680

 

670 - 5373 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+670

 

950 - 5023 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+950

 

760 ti - 5090 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+760

 

580 - 5021 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+580

 

 

Under 5000

 

760 - 4941 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?id=2561

 

660 Ti - 4679 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+660

 

1050 - 4425 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+1050&id=3596

 

570 - 4419 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+570

 

480 - 4355 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=geforce+gtx+480

 

660 - 4124 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?id=2152

 

 

Under 4000

 

750 Ti - 3710 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+750

 

470 - 3694 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+470

 

560 Ti - 3537 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+560

 

650 Ti BOOST - 3534 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+650

 

750 - 3283 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+750&id=2825

 

560 - 3123 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?id=71

 

 

Under 3000

 

460 - 2655 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+460

 

1030 - 2297 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GT+1030

 

745 - 2173 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+745

 

550 Ti - 1927 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=geforce+gtx+550+ti

 

650 - 1831 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+650&id=2155

 

 

Under 1500

 

450 - 1558 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTS+450

 

640 - 1282 - https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GT+640

 

 

Observations

 

 

There are also some notable observations from that list:

 

- the 1030 really sucks

 

- they sold a lot of 560 Ti which means used availability might be good UPDATE: needs to be 600 series or greater to get current drivers

 

- the 580 really holds on nicely for its age UPDATE: needs to be 600 series or greater to get current driver

 

- the 950 is surprisingly well endowed

 

- the 770 holds up well as the best (affordable)  performer of the pre-9xx generation

 

- the 1060 really pulls away from the crowd compared to previous generation type jumps.

 

 

Anyone passing by: please comment on this list to add corrections, omissions, your experience... It would be interesting for people to mention which cards hit a value sweet spot in their geographic location.

 

Based on looking at the value GPUs in  list of older GPUs above, I grabbed a GTX 770 to test out to see if there is a non-benchmark perceptual improvement over a GTX 570

 

I will report back - Yes, so I did that and the 770 is very much nicer than the 570 and also hits the arbitrary NVIDIA cutoff point for current driver support. The 770 will meet the gaming needs of any casual  and mid-level gaming, but of course there are a couple of significant jumps beyond it to 1060, again a big jump to 1080 to 2080.

 

 

I pointed to the GTX 1050Ti as a value-GPU candidate (vs. the non-TI version of the same GPU) due to capabilities vs. price.

 

1.  The Ti version typically uses no more power at the slot than the non-Ti version - a power pig it is not.  For those same reasons, it can replace straight-up any non-powered nV GPU of the previous generation (if not a good half of the powered nV GPUs of two or more generations back - only the Titans can't have their chop called - surprising that a mainstream GPU can do that.

 

2.  Then there is that lack of power use - the GTX 1050 Ti uses less than 80W, despite a loadout of 5 GB of GDDR5.  To put that in understandable terms, the GTX550Ti it replaced (of mine) used more power, and had one-fifth the memory.  It didn't merely get blown into last year (the older part) - it got blown into five years ago.

 

3.  A GTX 1060 would have been overkill - 4K would, in fact, BE overkill - my display doesn't go there - nor is it on the horizon.

  On 17/01/2018 at 01:57, PGHammer said:

I pointed to the GTX 1050Ti as a value-GPU candidate (vs. the non-TI version of the same GPU) due to capabilities vs. price.

 

1.  The Ti version typically uses no more power at the slot than the non-Ti version - a power pig it is not.  For those same reasons, it can replace straight-up any non-powered nV GPU of the previous generation (if not a good half of the powered nV GPUs of two or more generations back - only the Titans can't have their chop called - surprising that a mainstream GPU can do that.

 

2.  Then there is that lack of power use - the GTX 1050 Ti uses less than 80W, despite a loadout of 5 GB of GDDR5.  To put that in understandable terms, the GTX550Ti it replaced (of mine) used more power, and had one-fifth the memory.  It didn't merely get blown into last year (the older part) - it got blown into five years ago.

 

3.  A GTX 1060 would have been overkill - 4K would, in fact, BE overkill - my display doesn't go there - nor is it on the horizon.

Expand  

You jumped from 1927 to 5802 on my list above.

 

So how much is the going price right now for a 1050 ti? From building up a list of prices converted to U.S.D. we might over time see some value sweet spots.

 

I paid about $60 for the GTX 770 at 6089, about the same level as a 1050 ti.

 

Of course there are lots of details such as DX Version, RAM size etc that can make individual comparisons interesting but one goal I had in mind was a handy reference for people that want to play games on a budget.

 

The other primary goal of course for any topic at Neowin is that we find it entertaining so all thoughts and opinions are welcome!

 

 

 

The MSI GTX 1050 TI GT OC (the version I own) is identical in configuration to the EVGA GTX 1050 Ti SSC (there is no difference except cosmetics).  Meanwhile the EVGA GTX 1050 Ti FTW and ASUS STRIX GTX 1050 Ti both require 6-pin power auxilliary feeds (for use for the cooling systems) despite neither having any more fans than the SSC or GT OC (both of which are dual-fan dual-width slot versions.  The surprising part is that my GT OC is, despite the two fans, silent in the default automatic fan configuration - and it sits atop my desk; if it made ANY noise - coil-whine or otherwise - I'd be aware of it because of that position - less than a foot from my right ear.  It's quieter than the one-fan GTX550 Ti it replaced. (An additional boggle factor, in fact.)

 

Best price from Amazon-based sellers is $238 - which is - quite bluntly - utter screwball - and I'm being nice. (I paid two-thirds of that.)  The week before I pulled the trigger, the prtice had spiked to $189USD (mining-related shens) and I maintained my stall (which had reached a month).  I suspect similar shens - and I therefore suggest doing nothing.  Do NOT succumb to such silly-season shens.

I have updated this reference list with a note about current NVIDIA driver support needing a 600 series or greater. It is a bogus arbitrary limit that discards a 580 while including a 620 but that's the way it is.

 

DO NOT buy a low end 600 to get current driver support. Very poor value. Check the value list first.

 

And finally I report back on my experiment to buy a used GTX 770 to prove it has EXCELLENT VALUE and the real world experience completely matches the benchmark numbers and maybe a bit more, it just seems to feel like it is not straining at all when the 570 is huffing and puffing. A minor distinction on older hardware since exposing the 770 to games you know it can't run would humble the beast compared to current gen GPUs

 

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Review: LincPlus enters the traditional NAS space with the 6-bay LincStation S1 by Steven Parker I have reviewed a couple of NAS units for LincPlus, the LincStation N1 and N2, which can only take SSDs (2.5-inch and NVMe. Now LincPlus is back with a more traditional 6-bay NAS that takes four HDDs and two NVMe. Yes, they call this a 6-bay NAS, probably because there is no limitation on how you can use the NVMe slots. The LincStation S1 started life on Kickstarter, but is now available for purchase on the official website. The specs of it are below: LincPlus LincStation S1 CPU: Intel Alder Lake-N N97, 4 cores 4 threads, up to 3.6 GHz TDP 12W Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs Memory: 8 GB LPDDR5 3200MT/s (replaceable) Disk Capacity: 112 TB (4x 24 TB SATA, 2x 8 TB NVMe) RAID Level RAID0, RAID1, RAID10, RAID5, RAID6 Network: 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE (10/100/1000/2.5 GbE) Internal storage: 1x 128 GB eMMC (USB boot drive) 4x SATA 3.0 2x 2280 NVMe USB Ports (Front) 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10 Gbps) 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (10 Gbps) USB Ports (Rear) 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A (10 Gbps) 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (10 Gbps) 2x USB 2.0 Type-A HDMI 1x (HDMI 2.0) Hardware Transcoding: H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 LED: Light strip (right side) Size (H/W/D): 231x195x156mm Weight: 2.9kg Power: 20V 7A DC (External PSU) Price: $599.99 As you can see from the specs, this is no slouch; it comes with an Intel N97, which was introduced in Q1 of 2023. This means that it now supports AV1 decoding, it can also decode H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9-15 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Alder Lake offering and sits just above Intel's entry-level mobile processor, albeit with an impressive TDP for the features it offers. As before, we are seeing another NAS with an acceptable, if not great, amount of RAM. As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The S1 (as I will be calling it) came in a big cardboard box that protected the inner cardboard box with the fancy decals. In the box LincPlus LincStation S1 Power adapter User Manual [full online guide] Unraid Starter License Card Accessories Pack (10x Screws, 1x Screwdriver and 8xHDD tray labels) Design It actually looks good. The S1 is made up of metal and plastic and is quite heavy at 2.9kg (without HDDs installed). The design looks more like something you'd proudly show off in an office rather than hiding it in a meter cabinet or storage room. In addition, each side, along with the top and bottom, serves a purpose that I will get into in more detail later. There is also a light strip on the side that is set to orange. There is no instruction in the booklet or online documentation on how this this can be changed, but from previous experience with the N1, and N2 I tried pointing to tower.local:50000 in a browser and I did get the light strip configuration page (which is in Chinese, but I auto-translated to English), however changing any of these options did not result in the light strip changing mode, brightness, or color. I have reported this to my contact at LincPlus and was told that the page does not configure the light strip on the side. This page is still public, so it does not require login credentials to configure the LED control test. On the front, and the left of the unit from top to bottom, there is a 1.77 inch touchscreen, LED indicators for network status, 4x HDD and 2x SSDs, below that there is a plastic cover that can be opened to the right to reveal the USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type C and Type A ports, and then under that is the Power Button. Around the back, from left to right, there is a barrel port, two 2.5 GbE ports, an HDMI 2.0 port, a USB 3.2 Type C (10Gbps) port, two USB 2.0 ports and a Type A USB 3.2 10Gbps port. Above that, there is a 3-stage toggle switch for LED lighting (Upper position—the front light is on, Center position—all lights are off, Lower position—the side LED strip is on). Finally, the other toggle switch controls whether the front touch-screen is on or off. There's still no Kensington Security Slot present, which is a bit of a shame, considering it's a data storage device. Left side Right side On the left side, you have the magnetic cover, which, when removed, reveals the NVMe heatsink, single SODIMM memory slot, USB flash drive, and battery (see image below). On the right, there is another array of LED indicators that does the same thing as the front one. NVMe slots USB Flash drive Upon removing the heatsink, which is kept in place by a pull spring clip system, you can find the two NVMe slots. One thing I like about these slots is that they do not use a screw or bolt to hold the drives in place. It is a pull spring clip system. So you pull the clip to the side, add the drive and let go, which clamps it into place. However, this system only works for 2280 lengths. TEAMGROUP supplied us with the MP44Q 4TB NVMe SSD that I am using here, my colleague, Chris White gifted me the 250 GB 970 Evo Plus many moons ago when he shipped me the Synology DS720+ that he reviewed for Neowin back in 2020! The USB Flash drive can be accessed rather easily, but it is real fiddly to put back in! Populating the LincStation S1 As can be seen above, this is a top-loading system of four HDDs. The sleds are toolless. The sled itself is quite innovative. On the right side, you can "pull out" the plastic side housing that clips the HDD into the sled. The second image shows how much it can be pulled to the side, just enough for the two plastic protrusions that double for screws to shift out of the way (you can see these in the third image, and what is on the left side of the HDD sled). Once you place the HDD at a 45-degree angle to the left, press down and then clip it in from the right, and it is secured. That's all there is to it! Touchscreen The touchscreen on the front of the S1 can show four different pieces of information: Product info and serial number, the system status, storage summary of all six bays, and the network status by swiping left or right on the screen. Documentation The documentation booklet's 30 pages in English, German, or French, included in the box, is quite clear on how to populate the S1, with instructions on how to activate the Unraid Basic key (with the activation code card that is included), along with how to set up a disk array and basic getting started tips. Setup BIOS The Aptio BIOS can also be accessed during boot on the S1 by mashing the DEL key. One thing to note, however, on booting, you only have a few seconds to change the boot options, for the choice to run Memtest86+, or other Unraid-related boot options. If you're too slow, then the S1 will boot to Unraid, which is the default choice. Initial Setup After pointing your web browser to http://tower.local/you are required to set a password for root. The LincStation S1 comes preinstalled with Unraid on the internal flash disk, so all you need to do is set your user account and set up a disk array. Unraid defaults to a RAID5-style array, which is perfectly fine for our use. The BASIC (or trial) license of Unraid supports up to six storage devices, which can make things a bit difficult when wanting to transfer data from an external disk to a fully populated array. A Plus license costs $59, so you would have to decide if that's worth the extra expense. The main dashboard of Unraid After logging in, you are presented with the main dashboard of Unraid, which was on version 6.12.10. I was offered to update to 7.1.4 and after checking the release notes and known issues before upgrading, and aside from ZFS storage pools not being downgradable back to 6.x (once migrated) it seemed like a painless update. For my testing, I assigned two 6TB HDDs to the array, along with the 250GB SSD for a cache device. After troubleshooting the inability to access the SMB shares, I was finally able to access the share I created on my LAN by typing \\TOWER\public in File Explorer, which enabled its visibility by clicking within Network to TOWER. The internal array check (of two disks) reported an average speed of 296 MB/sec, which is pretty decent for traditional HDDs. The OS is written to the internal flash drive, but in order to install apps, an array must be present since the /appdata/ folder is saved on the disk array. I ran a CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 24H2 PC connected over a 10 GbE hub (S1 is limited to 2.5 GbE), and as you can see, the HDD array is performing well within expected speeds. Heat As far as heat goes, the large 140mm fan is doing its work, even during and after building the array, the HDDs reported a max temp of 43C, and as I am writing now with the S1 in idle state it is reporting a max HDD temp of 38C. Unraid comes with a community app store that contains tens of thousands of apps. In some cases, there are multiple flavors of the same app, such as Plex, so do look out for the OFFICIAL stamped in the top right corner of the app to be sure you are installing the intended version, or maybe you prefer a different take on the app, it's up to you! I installed Plex, and all I had to do was assign a temp directory for Plex Transcode and add a path for my media. After copying some media files over and accessing the new Plex server from my Google TV, I could start streaming immediately. Conclusion The ups Things I like about the S1 include the newer and more efficient Alder Lake CPU, with support for AV1 decoding and dual 2.5 GbE connectivity. You are also not locked into Unraid. If you want, you can remove the eMMC flash drive, located in the left NVMe bay, and flash it with something else, like TrueNAS, Xpenology, or some other NAS OS. However, be warned that Unraid (once activated) locks to the GUID of the eMMC flash drive, so it's best to ensure you have a backup image of the flash drive's contents, and be careful not to misplace it should you opt to replace it with a different flash drive. The downs While the build is really good compared to, say, the 2023 released TerraMaster F4-423, which is a mostly plastic exterior, the S1 is still $100 more expensive with a slightly better CPU. Is it worth it? Depending on your use case, this is still a good NAS that is not locked into an OS or even the hardware that you may populate it with. If you are looking to get up and going quickly, then this ticks the boxes; however, I do question why this more expensive model went with 2.5 GbE when the cheaper (all SSD) LincStation N2 has 10 GbE. There is also a lot of community support regarding the apps you can install in Unraid on the LincStation S1, so you won't have to look far and wide to get yourself up and running. So it ain't all bad. I'd argue that this is still great value for money. Purchase options As of writing, you can get this for $559.99, which is $40 off its slightly higher MSRP pricing of $599.99. You can save an additional 5% off when you enter the coupon code NEOWIN during checkout. It is not yet available on the official LincPlus Amazon page. According to the User Manual, the LincStation S1 has a domestic warranty period of 12 months (from the date of purchase), which is not extendable and covers the basics such as build workmanship and breakdowns during normal use. As an Amazon Associat,e we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • How does having no RBG a Con? That should automatically be a Pro
    • Shocking that 7600/7200mhz ram is faster than 6000mhz ram in some cases. I am pretty sure in real world usage no one could even tell a difference. This review reads like a paid ad.
    • Well, yeah. "beginner" isn't really a word. You can start with any distro. There's no "starting" distro that makes using Linux "easy".
    • Instagram has a weird bug that doesn't allow sharing Reels with some, but there is a fix by Usama Jawad I am not a particularly active user of Instagram in the conventional sense, but I do use it heavily to share Reels with my wife and siblings. For me, Reels are the lifeblood of Instagram, and just the ability to share my own photos or see someone else's photos isn't enough to convince me to use the app on a daily basis. As such, me and the Mrs. ran into a major problem yesterday when she realized that while she could see Reels and share them with some of her other friends, she was unable to share them with me. My profile wouldn't appear in the share dialog even though it's usually at the top and it wasn't surfaced even when she manually tried through the search bar. Interestingly, I could still share Reels with her and we could see each other's previously shared content in the chats on our respective phones. We also realized that the camera icon in our chats had changed; usually it's a pink background with a white camera icon in it, but now, it was a blue background with a black camera outline. For the past day or so, we looked for solutions to this problem which was only affecting our chats, everything else within the app seemed fine, but these efforts were in futile. Just now, the Mrs. noticed that when she pressed on the Share button rather than using the share dialog directly, and then navigated to Instagram Messages, my name finally popped up, but it had "AI" written below it. Now that we had another clue about what to search for, so we headed to Google and added this piece of the puzzle to our search query. And lo and behold, there are several other people on Reddit who have been experiencing this issue in the past couple of days too. There is a dedicated thread on the topic with a couple of hundred upvotes and a few dozen comments. Scrolling through the comments frantically as if we were searching for the Holy Grail, me and the Mrs. finally came across recommendations to fix the problem. Apparently, all you need to do is log out and then log in again. We did just that and hallelujah, we can finally share Reels with each other again without a hitch. It's interesting that there is no media coverage on the topic even though the problem has garnered a decent amount of attention on Reddit. That said, the impact and root cause is currently unknown, we have reached out to Meta for further information and will update this article if the company responds. But for now, if you do experience the bug, just log out and then back in again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      John Volks earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      KenKay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      KenKay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Amadou earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      TheRingmaster earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      641
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      244
    3. 3
      Xenon
      180
    4. 4
      neufuse
      154
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      123
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!