Recommended Posts

He predicts the PS4 will be a wild-success after it already is dominating the sales charts, he predicts Titanfall 2 would not be a Microsoft exclusive after EA announce titanfall 2 would not be a Microsoft exclusive.

 

 

 

I guess in that way he is kind of like a psychic: he proves his abilities by claiming he knew something was going to happen after it happens.

  • 4 weeks later...

Project Morpheus, Sony's PlayStation 4 virtual reality helmet, is much better than expected

http://www.polygon.com/2014/3/19/5526966/project-morpheus-sonys-playstation-4-virtual-reality-helmet-is-much

 

 

The post-Oculus world has a minimum level of quality for virtual reality that new products have to at least match, if not clear, and Sony?s push into console-based virtual reality could poison the well for other companies if their high-profile hardware isn?t up to the task.
 
 
Luckily, it works well. Very well.

 

Sony_Project_Morpheus_35873300-2901-013_

 

Sony's challenge was to prove that it could do virtual reality as well as the Oculus Rift, and they passed that test with ease.
 
 
The display looks wonderful, the demos were running at 60 frames per second, the screens looked just about as good as the Rift Development Kit 2, and the issues with light bleed and field of view can be fixed with a different fitting around the eyes and a slightly different display.
 
 
Sony has nailed the hard parts of virtual reality, and now it's just a matter of finishing the hardware and shoring up software support. Based on these early demos, they're onto something special.

 

272262-DSC01202.jpg

There already is a mropheus topic, why make a new one ? 

 

As for performance. Sterescopic rendering requires slightly more than a normal scene, but not as much as you'd think. a lot of resources are shared for both left and right 

  • 5 weeks later...

The hype train for VR is certainly nearing critical levels. Sony is certainly going to cash in on that big time.

Its interesting that the article posted makes a big deal about the Move controllers, even to suggest that they be bundled.

I think bundling would probably cause too much negative backlash, so keep it separate. It'll be very interesting to see if Sony can make this a big deal. People are holding this up as the next revolution in gaming, so there is a lot to live up to. Will this be the moment that VR really catches on long term, or will it slowly fade away again until better tech arrives.

The hype train for VR is certainly nearing critical levels. Sony is certainly going to cash in on that big time.

Its interesting that the article posted makes a big deal about the Move controllers, even to suggest that they be bundled.

I think bundling would probably cause too much negative backlash, so keep it separate. It'll be very interesting to see if Sony can make this a big deal. People are holding this up as the next revolution in gaming, so there is a lot to live up to. Will this be the moment that VR really catches on long term, or will it slowly fade away again until better tech arrives.

 

Are you saying that because of Kinect? If so... 

 

Sony currently bundle their camera as well, there is no backlash as there is an option to buy without. That changes everything. There is nothing wrong with bundling when there are alternative options, after all the Kinect arguments I'm sure you know that trooper.

Are you saying that because of Kinect? If so... 

 

Sony currently bundle their camera as well, there is no backlash as there is an option to buy without. That changes everything. There is nothing wrong with bundling when there are alternative options, after all the Kinect arguments I'm sure you know that trooper.

Why bring up Kinect? I didn't mention that at all. Maybe its time to move on from that stuff? Seems like some people are too focused on it.

My point was that if you bundle the move controllers with their headset, its going to result in an even more expensive package. Unless they plan to eat some big losses up front, a package with those controllers could easily push past $400. So if they want at least a chance for more mainstream adoption, they should offer multiple options in order to offer their headset at the cheapest price possible.

Now, if Sony were to decide that having move controllers was a must in order to offer a good experience, then maybe you consider a single bundle, but they would need to be very confident in that.

Why bring up Kinect? I didn't mention that at all. Maybe its time to move on from that stuff? Seems like some people are too focused on it.

My point was that if you bundle the move controllers with their headset, its going to result in an even more expensive package. Unless they plan to eat some big losses up front, a package with those controllers could easily push past $400. So if they want at least a chance for more mainstream adoption, they should offer multiple options in order to offer their headset at the cheapest price possible.

Now, if Sony were to decide that having move controllers was a must in order to offer a good experience, then maybe you consider a single bundle, but they would need to be very confident in that.

 

Because you mentioned bundling and negative backlash. The only negative backlash surrounding bundling has been with Kinect.

 

Sony are obviously going to offer multiple options, they already have with the PS4 launch. There will most likely be a bundle with a little off RRP, that's how bundles work. I picked up my Killzone SF PS4 bundle at launch with 2 DS4's and the camera for ?429. You'd pay more for the extra DS4, KZ SF and Camera and PS4 separately.

 

When not forced they are viable solutions to individuals that want them, that's always been the case for the past 10 years. The only issue that ever arises with bundling is when it isn't an option, it's the only choice.

Because you mentioned bundling and negative backlash. The only negative backlash surrounding bundling has been with Kinect.

 

Sony are obviously going to offer multiple options, they already have with the PS4 launch. There will most likely be a bundle with a little off RRP, that's how bundles work. I picked up my Killzone SF PS4 bundle at launch with 2 DS4's and the camera for ?429. You'd pay more for the extra DS4, KZ SF and Camera and PS4 separately.

 

When not forced they are viable solutions to individuals that want them, that's always been the case for the past 10 years. The only issue that ever arises with bundling is when it isn't an option, it's the only choice.

That's cool, but Kinect really doesn't play into this. I made a simple point about the article and that is all, not trying to bring Kinect into this. You seem to be trying hard to make points in response to other threads or posts, not this thread.

In fact, it sounds like you completely agree with my point, so I'm not sure why your arguing with me about it. I didn't say Sony would try to bundle their headset with the move controllers, I was just reacting to the author of the article that claimed it would be a good idea. I don't think Sony should do that and I would be very shocked if they tried that.

Another gimmick that will probably fail. Last thing I want to do is wear a huge wired headset covering most of my head. They should just focus resources on what's important, that being the actual games.

 

Yeah the hype sounds about the same as it always has been for Kinect and I expect it'll do about as good as Kinect, so niche, but not game changing like many people seem to think.

That's cool, but Kinect really doesn't play into this. I made a simple point about the article and that is all, not trying to bring Kinect into this. You seem to be trying hard to make points in response to other threads or posts, not this thread.

In fact, it sounds like you completely agree with my point, so I'm not sure why your arguing with me about it. I didn't say Sony would try to bundle their headset with the move controllers, I was just reacting to the author of the article that claimed it would be a good idea. I don't think Sony should do that and I would be very shocked if they tried that.

 

If it works with move why on earth wouldn't they do a bundle? They've already spoke about how it's part of their VR vision as one of the things "lacking" with oculus is greater immersion with your hands.

 

You're going to get a top tier bundle with the whole lot, camera, move and the headset. Sure it will be expensive as ####, but for someone without a PS4 and wanting VR it will be cheaper than buying everything separately.

If it works with move why on earth wouldn't they do a bundle? They've already spoke about how it's part of their VR vision as one of the things "lacking" with oculus is greater immersion with your hands.

 

You're going to get a top tier bundle with the whole lot, camera, move and the headset. Sure it will be expensive as ####, but for someone without a PS4 and wanting VR it will be cheaper than buying everything separately.

Um, the article was suggesting that those pieces were so crucial that a single bundle that offered those pieces together might be a good idea.

Again, my point was that I didn't think that was a good idea and that Sony should offer as many bundles as they could. Once again, your agreeing with me.

I never said don't do a bundle at all, so for whatever reason your reading way too much into it and trying to 'argue'. There is nothing to argue.

  • 3 weeks later...

Project Morpheus Hands-On: The Virtual Future Is Very, Very Bright

btvdoftilj5qomzwdvrt.jpg

 

When Sony announced its intentions to take Oculus Rift head-on, we were excited. The Rift (rightly) gets all of the attention and praise for its VR prowess, but a little competition would be good for the emerging technology. Today at E3 in Los Angeles we finally got to try Project Morpheus for ourselves. And man, it's pretty awesome.
 
Admittedly, I only had it on for five minutes stretches, but the Morpheus hardware?which looks like futuristic ski goggles?is surprisingly light and feels well balanced. I can imagine playing for hours without neck strain. That being said, Sony is very clear that the hardware is still prototype, although that was apparent enough already; some units actually had duct tape on them.

 

When you put the visor on, you first press the rear plastic strap in, cinching it down to get a tight fit on your head. You can also use a small wheel to dial in the fit even more precisely. Press a separate button to slide the display closer to or further from your eyes, plug a pair of headphones into the unit, and you're ready to go.
At today's demo I was able to try three different games. And while Morpheus won't be released this year?or maybe not even the next?it already showed me some pretty wild stuff. We weren't allowed to take video of what it looks like inside the goggles, but you can get a sense of what it felt like from the displays that showed off my point of view.

More at Source: Gizmodo

  • Like 2
  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!