Recommended Posts

Turning off the effects is just a placebo.

 

If you are talking about the fade effects and animations. In that case it's not placebo. The effects might add only millisecond delays but without them the OS feels much snappier. They are pretty much the very first thing I disable on any Windows XP , vista, 7 or 8 machine. In the case of Vista and 7 I do leave on the desktop composition or what ever it's called.. I leave on the transparency. 

The point is there are distros and desktop environments that are designed to be run on older hardware. Lxubuntu, Puppy, DSL, Xubuntu, and lots more.

 

Sorry but that video is a load of FUD. I like how he disabled comments to keep anyone from refuting it. None of my Windows 7 systems behave that way.

 

Anyone can make a video using a crappy system and bad display drivers. It proves nothing.  http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=313886

  • Like 1

They forgot the most important tip.

 

Clone the updated hard drive before you can get attacked by malware.

 

If you get an OS damaging virus, you can just swap drives, with few problems.

 

No hunting for Updates, or worrying about product activation.

 

Then you can zero out the drive, then 'reclone' the original drive.

 

And when your original drive goes bye-bye, you will be ready to repair your XP computer.

I wouldn't exactly call a Core 2 Duo system modern hardware; those things are ancient. It probably has a very old video card too.

HD 5770.

Try your test again on an actual new PC. Windows XP does not properly support today's technologies very well, if at all.

Many new PC's won't run XP because OEM's don't provide driver support. And if by technologies, you're talking about DirectX, of course not. Microsoft purposely holds back features from older versions. Just look at internet explorer. Some people have hacked the latest DX on it though, which once again indicates the only thing holding it back is Microsoft.

Sorry but that video is a load of FUD. I like how he disabled comments to keep anyone from refuting it. None of my Windows 7 systems behave that way.

Can you can provide video evidence to the contrary?

 

Anyone can make a video using a crappy system and bad display drivers. It proves nothing.  http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=313886

It's not going to be fixed. Microsoft completely removed hardware acceleration from Windows Vista. Now in Windows 7 they have reintroduced about 10 gdi functions with hardware acceleration (only with WDDM 1.1 drivers), but they are not enough to make the gui as fast as Windows XP is.

Microsoft already has two hardware accelerated GUI apis in Windows 7: Direct2D and WPF. The problem is 99% of Windows 7 gui is GDI/GDI+ based, and so does 99% of 3rd party applications.

The point is there are distros and desktop environments that are designed to be run on older hardware. Lxubuntu, Puppy, DSL, Xubuntu, and lots more.

Some of those yes. Some no. Anything based on Ubuntu for example will not run on some older processors. Got an old laptop with a Pentium M? You're boned, the kernel requires PAE support which that processor doesn't have. Well unless you stick with an older version of the OS, kind of the exact same boat you're in with XP. Puppy and DSL aside (which aren't exactly all that good...) most distros will be problematic and slow. Never mind you're still screwed if the thing has very little memory.. even if you're only using a LXDE or something as soon as you fire up anything remotely current you're going to kill off what memory it does have. Good luck getting a browser going with a reasonable semblance of performance for example. Old is old, just switching to a different OS isn't going to magically cure that. Well, unless you turn it into a GUI-less server, that'll work of course.

Not sure why you linked the video a second time.. same response as before. Also in the same boat with video drivers on Linux on a few of the junkers sitting here. Anything with an older ATI board for example? Boned. Well unless you want to use the open source drivers but you can kiss performance goodbye with that. (And to head off any speeches in advance, it's been well documented with benchmarks, even Linux oriented sites like Phoronix.)

I think a core 2 duo with 4GB of ram and an SSD running 7 or 8 would run just fine.

The one C2D sitting here as a "random use workstation" only has 2GB and a regular mechanical SATA drive and it runs 7 quite well.. I wouldn't try to run a VM on it or anything obviously (2GB is still not a lot) but for the regular stuff, zero complaints.

Probably should clarify, I wasn't saying Windows 7 won't run on a Core 2 Duo, it will work fine. In fact I'm running it on a Pentium 4 with no issues at all. I was saying that it isn't exactly modern hardware and my original point was that Windows 7 is designed to support modern technologies, XP is not and will not run as efficiently on a new system as 7 will. As for that video, that's complete nonsense. No one uses there computer like that, why would you sit and rapidly resize windows? Even if there was a rational reason to do that, my Windows 7 system does not have any problem resizing windows or refreshing explorer. There is no flickering or delay at all. Some of the excuses people come up with for clinging to an old outdated OS are just silly.

Some of those yes. Some no. Anything based on Ubuntu for example will not run on some older processors. Got an old laptop with a Pentium M? You're boned, the kernel requires PAE support which that processor doesn't have.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/930447/comments/84

And there's nothing stopping people from using non-buntu distros. Desktop environments like LXDE, Fluxbox, or XFCE can be installed on anything. You can even select your own kernel features with Gentoo.

Well unless you stick with an older version of the OS, kind of the exact same boat you're in with XP. Puppy and DSL aside (which aren't exactly all that good...) most distros will be problematic and slow. Never mind you're still screwed if the thing has very little memory..

From my experience memory isn't usually the main problem upgrading to 7 or 8, it's the graphics. If a machine only has 512mb, that will run fine in a DE like fluxbox, openbox, or LXDE. If it has more, it'll run fine in XFCE, MATE, etc.

even if you're only using a LXDE or something as soon as you fire up anything remotely current you're going to kill off what memory it does have. Good luck getting a browser going with a reasonable semblance of performance for example.

There are many lightweight browsers on Linux. Links -g is especially excellent. Dillo also runs well on my 512mb Raspberry PI. Or worst comes to worst, there are text based ones like links, elinks, lynx etc.

Old is old, just switching to a different OS isn't going to magically cure that. Well, unless you turn it into a GUI-less server, that'll work of course.

It won't stop the hardware being old, but it can extend the life of it significantly. Especially when the choice is between using an unsupported OS like XP or having to buy completely new hardware.

Not sure why you linked the video a second time.. same response as before.

Tut tut. You clearly didn't watch the second one ;) It's a different video. You should watch it, it's very.. informative and relevant to our discussion :D

Also in the same boat with video drivers on Linux on a few of the junkers sitting here. Anything with an older ATI board for example? Boned.

Actually that's the opposite for Linux open source drivers. The older models are better optimised. I found that out the hard way when I bought a new r9 270 and found that my 5770 had better FOSS drivers :/ I had to switch to the proprietary ones. Fortunately, the open drivers are getting better now.

Well unless you want to use the open source drivers but you can kiss performance goodbye with that. (And to head off any speeches in advance, it's been well documented with benchmarks, even Linux oriented sites like Phoronix.)

Well ATI doesn't support older chips anyway, so the only choice is the open source ones. However, if you look at Phoronix, you'll see that the open drivers have suppassed the proprietary ones in some categories such as 2d rendering, and on the older hardware. Specifically my 5770 does very well on the open drivers. I can run 3d games at good performance, and 2d is great. Even the DPM has improved massively lately.

I think a core 2 duo with 4GB of ram and an SSD running 7 or 8 would run just fine.

 

I had to downgrade after my i7 board died. I bought a cheap Core2Duo E7500 off Amazon, installed it in an old LGA775 board I still had with two 2GB sticks of DDR3 ram and it works like a charm with Windows 7. Works just as good as XP would if not better, my Only gripe is I can only use one of my GTX 460's and it doesn't perform well with some games such as Team Fortress 2. Some one posted elsewhere they tried running Windows 7 on a VM with 768MB ram or lower and it ran fine. Windows 7 is not really much slower than XP was if at all, it feels smoother and faster than XP due to graphics acceleration supported by Aero/DWM in Vista and later Windows releases.

 

If you have modern hardware such as a Core2Duo or newer/better you shouldn't bother installing or using Windows XP if other options are accessible. Otherwise you will be sacrificing your system running at it's full potential,l namely you'll sacrifice enhancements offered in Vista and newer that offer better performance and increased productivity. You will also be sacrificing using up to date software and playing recent games. Most recent software and games are phasing out XP support due to moving exclusively to DX10/11 as supporting DX9 was holding development back because DX9 didn't support features that DX10/11 does and supporting both were causing issues in some cases. I've also read that XP lacks support for certain hardware such as Blu-Ray drives and I'm not sure if it's still possible to run XP on modern hardware that utilize UEFI instead of a bios.

Yea I know you can roll your own custom kernel.. but who typically wants to do that, never mind trying to get Grandma to do that over the phone? Sooner or later these sort of "cutoffs" are going to happen to other mainstream distros as well. A lot of people aren't upgrading because they're just comfortable with what they have and don't want to switch.. switching plus suggesting they tackle something like that too? That's not going to go over well.

 

You can even select your own kernel features with Gentoo.

Just gave Grandma a heart attack suggesting she tackles Gentoo.

 

From my experience memory isn't usually the main problem upgrading to 7 or 8, it's the graphics. If a machine only has 512mb, that will run fine in a DE like fluxbox, openbox, or LXDE. If it has more, it'll run fine in XFCE, MATE, etc.

Yes, if it has more it'll run anything. Many of these older machines do not however. (Which goes back to your original post about not spending money.) And just because it'll boot doesn't mean it'll be usable. Again, try loading up say Firefox or Chromium and OpenOffice at the same time... but yes, dinosaur graphic cards will be an issue as well.

 

There are many lightweight browsers on Linux. Links -g is especially excellent. Dillo also runs well on my 512mb Raspberry PI. Or worst comes to worst, there are text based ones like links, elinks, lynx etc.

Well yes, there's Lynx and such... but that's hardly a reasonable replacement now is it? It's like saying AwesomeWM is a 100% suitable replacement for the likes of KDE. Even posted a screenshot in the "Show us your browser layout" thread with it as a joke way back when.

 

Tut tut. You clearly didn't watch the second one ;) It's a different video. You should watch it, it's very.. informative and relevant to our discussion :D

Yes, I've seen it posted many times before. And my answer still stands.

 

Well ATI doesn't support older chips anyway, so the only choice is the open source ones.

On Linux yes. Still works on Windows. Older drivers obviously, but not left hanging in the breeze either. Not that either are ideal for anything current anyways, but still..

As far as benchmarks go, I'm looking at a open source vs Catalyst benchmark dated this year and it's still got a long way to catch up performance wise. I'll grant that it's improving, some tests even came reasonably close, but way too many of them are still quite behind, some showing a difference of 50% or more. That's pretty big. And to quote Phoronix:

"With the Radeon HD 7000 series graphics cards and newer on the RadeonSI Gallium3D driver, yesterday's results showed the performance is improving but still has a long ways to go. Users of the open-source Radeon Linux graphics driver are also still waiting on open-source OpenCL support to be in a good, working manner, OpenGL 4.x support, and a variety of other smaller work items found in Catalyst but not in the open-source driver."

Many new PC's won't run XP because OEM's don't provide driver support. And if by technologies, you're talking about DirectX, of course not. Microsoft purposely holds back features from older versions. Just look at internet explorer. Some people have hacked the latest DX on it though, which once again indicates the only thing holding it back is Microsoft.

You do realize that the latest DirectX includes technologies that XP can't handle at all? Microsoft would seriously need to overhaul XP underlying codebase to run DX10. It's not a matter of Microsoft holding back support, it really is a matter of XP not being able to run it. And those people that "hacked" support for it, weren't successful in the slightest. That project was laughable, at best.

 

Same story with IE9. IE9 included technologies that XP just can't support, again, without significant codebase overhauls.

All this hardware argument is pointless.  Microsoft discontinued XP years ago, and soon will discontinue support.  You can either upgrade and stay supported, or stick with XP and end up getting bit-raped.

 

Your choice.

  • Like 2

"With the Radeon HD 7000 series graphics cards and newer on the RadeonSI Gallium3D driver, yesterday's results showed the performance is improving but still has a long ways to go. Users of the open-source Radeon Linux graphics driver are also still waiting on open-source OpenCL support to be in a good, working manner, OpenGL 4.x support, and a variety of other smaller work items found in Catalyst but not in the open-source driver."

I thought we were talking about older hardware? the 7k is modern. I already noted that the FOSS drivers for them are lacking. I had that experience myself, where the drivers for my 5770 did better. FOSS drivers for older hardware are usually better optimised and stable due to the fact that they've been worked on longer and support more features. I couldn't get VAAPI (video acceleration) to work on r9 270 for example. The support is getting better but it's still sketchy. For now the proprietary drivers are still better.

If you look at r600 mesa/gallium3d/ati-dri/xf86-video-ati codebase it's very good right now. The 2d benchmarks indicate that it's superior to the proprietary drivers (catalyst).

I thought we were talking about older hardware? the 7k is modern.

It's really hard to find current benchmarks published for old hardware ;) If I post something from years ago, obviously that's no good as the drivers evolved since then. I can offer you benchmarks on current software with old hardware, but then that'll be considered biased or anecdotal. (Even though I do use Linux daily.)

If you look at r600 mesa/gallium3d/ati-dri/xf86-video-ati codebase it's very good right now. The 2d benchmarks indicate that it's superior to the proprietary drivers (catalyst).

Yes, 2D's fine. It's 3D where it falls apart. That's still just one thing though.. pretty graphics won't help your system if it's still unable to run the software in the first place.

It's really hard to find current benchmarks published for old hardware ;) If I post something from years ago, obviously that's no good as the drivers evolved since then. I can offer you benchmarks on current software with old hardware, but then that'll be considered biased or anecdotal. (Even though I do use Linux daily.)

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_radeon_2014gallium&num=3

4870 is quite old. There are benchmarks for older hardware too on Phoronix.

Yes, 2D's fine. It's 3D where it falls apart. That's still just one thing though.. pretty graphics won't help your system if it's still unable to run the software in the first place.

Old XP machines are unlikely to run the latest and greatest anyway. And 3D on my 5770's FOSS driver is virtually the same as catalyst. Catalyst does have better DPM (dynamic power management) though.

Really don't understand the furore about upgrading from XP. People didn't have this kind of issue upgrading from earlier versions of Windows, so why is XP so special?

 

It's a dinosaur, get over it and upgrade.

 

no previous OS has been more ingrained in our institutions. an operating system being so widely used for so long is unprecedented. Also never before have so many advancements in security been made. XP SP2 was a modest first step. Also alot of the reason why they are keeping the old OS is because they are reliant on internal web apps built around... IE6. That's horrible for the web.

Gah.. unrelated to the topic being discussed but sometimes I wish this forum didn't have a time limit on editing posts. I'm very OCD and if I see something wrong in my post it bothers me if I can't go back to fix any errors, Noticed spelling and grammatical errors in my post. Damn sleep deprivation and barely being able to see the text on my screen without it appearing blurry, seems mah vision is going with me getting older. :(

If you are talking about the fade effects and animations. In that case it's not placebo. The effects might add only millisecond delays but without them the OS feels much snappier. They are pretty much the very first thing I disable on any Windows XP , vista, 7 or 8 machine. In the case of Vista and 7 I do leave on the desktop composition or what ever it's called.. I leave on the transparency. 

It can actually make the performance worst if you disable the visual effects & animations:

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2013/03/27/10405554.aspx

 

Edit: Just noticed that you mentioned Desktop Composition and although that may be the main example used in the article, there are other things mentioned too!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!