Recommended Posts

I installed Mint Linux on VMWare player, and set the VM to use a bridged connection and to replicate a physical network state.

nwsettings_zpsf006a547.jpg

nwsettings2_zpsc55caef2.jpg

Initially, it worked fine, but somehow, after attempting to install Snort and restarting the VM, it could no longer connect to the internet, despite no changes were made to the VM's network connection settings, like in the screenshots below:

nwsettings4_zps1a2528d7.jpg

nwsettings5_zpsad663f40.jpg

nwsettings6_zps58cb05ab.jpg

I even checked Windows' firewall settings, but, that too appears to be unchanged.

nwsettings3_zps3bcfff2d.jpg

Does anyone have any idea what might have caused this problem and any suggestions on how to fix this?

 

So your vm got that info from dhcp?  Can you ping the gateway?  Why would you be bridging all 3 interfaces on your host machine?  is your host machine connected to internet via wire or wireless?  That is the only one that should be bridge.  And bridging wireless can have issues.

 

First thing to troubleshoot is to see if the linux vm can ping other devices on the network its on and can it ping the gateway (your router IP on that 192.168.1.0/24 network

I would pick one adapter for starters, bridging all 3 (especially wired/wireless) is not going to bode well for reliability. Or create multiple NIC's on your VM and bridge individually if you need access to multiple networks.

So your vm got that info from dhcp?  Can you ping the gateway?  Why would you be bridging all 3 interfaces on your host machine?  is your host machine connected to internet via wire or wireless?  That is the only one that should be bridge.  And bridging wireless can have issues.

 

First thing to troubleshoot is to see if the linux vm can ping other devices on the network its on and can it ping the gateway (your router IP on that 192.168.1.0/24 network

 

Well, I'm usually connected to the internet via wireless. Also, I actually removed and reinstalled Linux on the VM, but I don't think it'll be consider solved, since I'm wary that it might happen again.

Well, sorry to resurrect this thread after almost a week. So, I've reinstalled Linux MInt and was installing Snort, when the problem reared its ugly head again.

 

I've followed the previous advice of sticking to only one adapter, as advised earlier:

 

VMwareissue_zpsc3e0b91c.jpg

 

And it worked fine, before it somehow wouldn't connect to the internet again.

 

So, I checked ifconfig in linux:
 

VMwareissue2_zps0bd1f573.jpg

 

And I could ping it from the host machine, as shown below:
 

VMwareissue3_zpsf003e085.jpg

 

So I checked to see if I could ping the host machine from the guest machine:

 

VMwareissue4_zps521a3c11.jpg

 

and I got this:

VMwareissue5_zps9c05e722.jpg

 

But then I noticed this:

 

VMwareissue6_zps084add95.jpg

 

and this is what happens when I tried to ping it:

 

VMwareissue7_zpsb15af3c9.jpg
 

Does anyone have any idea why this happened?

It seems you have some confusion about how VMnet adapters work.

By default the VMnet adapters are selected as below:

VMnet0 - Used when bridging option is selected

VMnet1 - Used when you select the host only mode

VMnet2/8 - Used when you select the NAT option. (You cannot ping 192.168.136.1 because you are connected to VMnet0)

 

If you go to Edit -> Virtual Network Editor.. you'll see how each of the adapter is configured and indeed change the default configuration completely as you need.

If you are using the default configuration, you should see VMnet1 and VMnet2/8 in your windows network connection.

VMnet0 cannot be seen because it is bridged with your physical adapter directly and Windows Firewall doesn't affect the connectivity between your VM and physical network.

 

I am not quite sure which version of VMware you are using but if you often switch between wifi and lan, I would like you to suggest selecting atheros ethernet adapter as well and in VM settings untick "Replicate physical network state", so that the VM doesn't see the network link getting disconnected when you switch.

 

I am using VMware 9 and it works flawlessly when I switch between the 2 :)

 

I hope this helps.

1) Okay so you can bridge all the network adapters because it will automatically choose the one connected and has the best metric.

2) 192.168.136.1 is most-likely for the NAT you can't ping that address because it's in a different subnet and there'll be no route to it.

3) Can you ping google DNS 8.8.8.8, if yes, then it's a DNS issue.

4) If you can't ping 8.8.8.8 then it's most-likely a default gateway issue and you should look up make sure you can ping the gateway first (192.168.1.1)

5) if you can ping the gateway then local LAN connectivity to the gateway is fine and you need to check the correct gateway is set (netstat -rn)

6) Reinstalling will do nothing.

 

Well, sorry to resurrect this thread after almost a week. So, I've reinstalled Linux MInt and was installing Snort, when the problem reared its ugly head again.

 

I've followed the previous advice of sticking to only one adapter, as advised earlier:

 

 

 

And it worked fine, before it somehow wouldn't connect to the internet again.

 

So, I checked ifconfig in linux:
 

 

 

And I could ping it from the host machine, as shown below:
 

 

 

So I checked to see if I could ping the host machine from the guest machine:

 

 

 

and I got this:
 

 

But then I noticed this:

 

 

 

and this is what happens when I tried to ping it:

 

 

Does anyone have any idea why this happened?

You do understand 192.168.1.1 was telling you cant get to 8.8.8.8

 

Do you have mac filtering on your router?  As stated before bridging wireless can bring its own pain.  You can look into why you can not get to 8.8.8.8 -- but wouldn't you just be using your router as your dns?  In your min what does your resolve.conf show for your name server?

 

example

root@observium:/tmp# cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
#     DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 192.168.1.253
search local.lan
 

If you do a nslookup or dig or host on mint what does it show you for your nameserver?

 

budman@observium:~$ nslookup www.google.com
Server:         192.168.1.253
Address:        192.168.1.253#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:   www.google.com
Address: 173.194.46.50
Name:   www.google.com
Address: 173.194.46.49

 

Its quite possible your issue is related to dns - but you need to understand what exactly your using for dns, and why is it not resolving - can you not get there like your ping shows, is your router blocking you from the internet because your bridging wireless?  etc. etc..
 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!