Recommended Posts

I installed Mint Linux on VMWare player, and set the VM to use a bridged connection and to replicate a physical network state.

nwsettings_zpsf006a547.jpg

nwsettings2_zpsc55caef2.jpg

Initially, it worked fine, but somehow, after attempting to install Snort and restarting the VM, it could no longer connect to the internet, despite no changes were made to the VM's network connection settings, like in the screenshots below:

nwsettings4_zps1a2528d7.jpg

nwsettings5_zpsad663f40.jpg

nwsettings6_zps58cb05ab.jpg

I even checked Windows' firewall settings, but, that too appears to be unchanged.

nwsettings3_zps3bcfff2d.jpg

Does anyone have any idea what might have caused this problem and any suggestions on how to fix this?

 

So your vm got that info from dhcp?  Can you ping the gateway?  Why would you be bridging all 3 interfaces on your host machine?  is your host machine connected to internet via wire or wireless?  That is the only one that should be bridge.  And bridging wireless can have issues.

 

First thing to troubleshoot is to see if the linux vm can ping other devices on the network its on and can it ping the gateway (your router IP on that 192.168.1.0/24 network

I would pick one adapter for starters, bridging all 3 (especially wired/wireless) is not going to bode well for reliability. Or create multiple NIC's on your VM and bridge individually if you need access to multiple networks.

So your vm got that info from dhcp?  Can you ping the gateway?  Why would you be bridging all 3 interfaces on your host machine?  is your host machine connected to internet via wire or wireless?  That is the only one that should be bridge.  And bridging wireless can have issues.

 

First thing to troubleshoot is to see if the linux vm can ping other devices on the network its on and can it ping the gateway (your router IP on that 192.168.1.0/24 network

 

Well, I'm usually connected to the internet via wireless. Also, I actually removed and reinstalled Linux on the VM, but I don't think it'll be consider solved, since I'm wary that it might happen again.

Well, sorry to resurrect this thread after almost a week. So, I've reinstalled Linux MInt and was installing Snort, when the problem reared its ugly head again.

 

I've followed the previous advice of sticking to only one adapter, as advised earlier:

 

VMwareissue_zpsc3e0b91c.jpg

 

And it worked fine, before it somehow wouldn't connect to the internet again.

 

So, I checked ifconfig in linux:
 

VMwareissue2_zps0bd1f573.jpg

 

And I could ping it from the host machine, as shown below:
 

VMwareissue3_zpsf003e085.jpg

 

So I checked to see if I could ping the host machine from the guest machine:

 

VMwareissue4_zps521a3c11.jpg

 

and I got this:

VMwareissue5_zps9c05e722.jpg

 

But then I noticed this:

 

VMwareissue6_zps084add95.jpg

 

and this is what happens when I tried to ping it:

 

VMwareissue7_zpsb15af3c9.jpg
 

Does anyone have any idea why this happened?

It seems you have some confusion about how VMnet adapters work.

By default the VMnet adapters are selected as below:

VMnet0 - Used when bridging option is selected

VMnet1 - Used when you select the host only mode

VMnet2/8 - Used when you select the NAT option. (You cannot ping 192.168.136.1 because you are connected to VMnet0)

 

If you go to Edit -> Virtual Network Editor.. you'll see how each of the adapter is configured and indeed change the default configuration completely as you need.

If you are using the default configuration, you should see VMnet1 and VMnet2/8 in your windows network connection.

VMnet0 cannot be seen because it is bridged with your physical adapter directly and Windows Firewall doesn't affect the connectivity between your VM and physical network.

 

I am not quite sure which version of VMware you are using but if you often switch between wifi and lan, I would like you to suggest selecting atheros ethernet adapter as well and in VM settings untick "Replicate physical network state", so that the VM doesn't see the network link getting disconnected when you switch.

 

I am using VMware 9 and it works flawlessly when I switch between the 2 :)

 

I hope this helps.

1) Okay so you can bridge all the network adapters because it will automatically choose the one connected and has the best metric.

2) 192.168.136.1 is most-likely for the NAT you can't ping that address because it's in a different subnet and there'll be no route to it.

3) Can you ping google DNS 8.8.8.8, if yes, then it's a DNS issue.

4) If you can't ping 8.8.8.8 then it's most-likely a default gateway issue and you should look up make sure you can ping the gateway first (192.168.1.1)

5) if you can ping the gateway then local LAN connectivity to the gateway is fine and you need to check the correct gateway is set (netstat -rn)

6) Reinstalling will do nothing.

 

Well, sorry to resurrect this thread after almost a week. So, I've reinstalled Linux MInt and was installing Snort, when the problem reared its ugly head again.

 

I've followed the previous advice of sticking to only one adapter, as advised earlier:

 

 

 

And it worked fine, before it somehow wouldn't connect to the internet again.

 

So, I checked ifconfig in linux:
 

 

 

And I could ping it from the host machine, as shown below:
 

 

 

So I checked to see if I could ping the host machine from the guest machine:

 

 

 

and I got this:
 

 

But then I noticed this:

 

 

 

and this is what happens when I tried to ping it:

 

 

Does anyone have any idea why this happened?

You do understand 192.168.1.1 was telling you cant get to 8.8.8.8

 

Do you have mac filtering on your router?  As stated before bridging wireless can bring its own pain.  You can look into why you can not get to 8.8.8.8 -- but wouldn't you just be using your router as your dns?  In your min what does your resolve.conf show for your name server?

 

example

root@observium:/tmp# cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
#     DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 192.168.1.253
search local.lan
 

If you do a nslookup or dig or host on mint what does it show you for your nameserver?

 

budman@observium:~$ nslookup www.google.com
Server:         192.168.1.253
Address:        192.168.1.253#53

Non-authoritative answer:
Name:   www.google.com
Address: 173.194.46.50
Name:   www.google.com
Address: 173.194.46.49

 

Its quite possible your issue is related to dns - but you need to understand what exactly your using for dns, and why is it not resolving - can you not get there like your ping shows, is your router blocking you from the internet because your bridging wireless?  etc. etc..
 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Would be good to see Google also being forced to do the same. No promotion of Chrome on Google search. Stop installing into the app data of a locked down machine, etc
    • FileZilla 3.70.6 by Razvan Serea FileZilla is powerful Open Source FTP/SFTP client with many features. It includes a site manager to store all your connection details and logins as well as an Explorer style interface that shows the local and remote folders and can be customized independently. The program offers support for firewalls and proxy connections as well as SSL and Kerberos GSS security. Additional features include keep alive, auto ascii/binary transfer, download queue, manual transfers, raw FTP commands and more. FileZilla key features: Cross-platform support – Available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. FTP, FTPS, and SFTP support – Handles standard and secure file transfer protocols. Tabbed user interface – Easily manage multiple connections at once. Site Manager – Save and organize server connection details. Drag & drop support – Quickly transfer files by dragging them. Filename filtering – Include or exclude specific files using filters. Directory comparison – Compare local and remote directories. Synchronized browsing – Navigate in sync between local and remote folders. Transfer queue – View, manage, and prioritize file transfers. Speed limits – Control upload/download speed to manage bandwidth usage. Keep-alive system – Prevents timeouts during long transfers. Remote file editing – Open and edit remote files using local editors. IPv6 support – Compatible with modern networking standards. FileZilla 3.70.6 changelog: New features SFTP: Added compatibility flag to Site Manager to ignore invalid bits in file attributes flags received from non-compliant servers Bugfixes and minor changes SFTP: Updated to fzssh 1.3.0 Updated to libfilezilla 0.56.1 Removed autodetection of FTP server type governing the remote path syntax. Exotic server types now need to be set explicitly on the advanced page in the Site Manager Download page: FileZilla 3.70.6 | ~10.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: FileZilla Home page | Documentation | FileZilla Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough" by Usama Jawad We have seen Microsoft resort to questionable tactics in the past to get more customers to use Edge, such as "bribing" people to use Edge, testing new behavior so that Edge loads automatically on startup every time, and pressuring OEMs to exclusively bundle Edge in Windows PCs. However, the company often receives pushback not only from customers but also from the Browser Choice Alliance (BCA). Now, the collective has penned an open letter to the Redmond tech firm to highlight its dissatisfaction with its practices. For those unaware, BCA is a coalition that touts several browser vendors as its members, including Google Chrome, Midori, Opera, Vivaldi, BrowserWorks, and Wavebox. Its latest open letter to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella emphasizes that "enough is enough" and that user choice on Windows should be respected. It claimed that the company is abusing its dominant position in the PC space to push customers to its first-party browser, even if they don't want to use it. To do this, it resorts to shady tactics, some of which we highlighted at the start of this piece. It says that Microsoft is making it very difficult for users to set their preferred browser across all touchpoints. This is problematic as PCs are becoming even more prevalent in the AI era, so user choice is being restricted across even more devices, further frustrating users (and competing browser vendors). As such, BCA has urged Microsoft to take the following actions to level the playing field: Allow browser suppliers to compete for preinstallation and default deals with Windows PC manufacturers End dark patterns targeted at users seeking to download and effectively use other browsers (including as system-level default) Bring back the ability for users to make switching default browsers simple and transparent with a “single click” change for all relevant file types and apps (including PDFs) Open all web links in the users’ selected system-level browser of choice Eliminate manipulative Microsoft-exclusive banners pushing Edge in Windows, including when users are searching for other browsers Stop using operating system updates to push users back to Edge Remove the restrictive configurations of existing S mode devices that block the usage of third-party browsers. It believes that all browsers should compete on merit, as this will drive innovation and healthy competition. Despite its strong wording and publication of the letter openly, it's unclear if Microsoft will pay any heed to the BCA and if this will result in any tangible downstream benefits. We'll likely find out in due time.
    • Boo! I was excited for this... Stargate SG-1 Star Michael Shanks Rallies Fans After Amazon Axes Revival, Says 'Now Is the Time to Say Something'
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!