Now that Facebook will own Oculus, are you going to buy an Oculus Rift?


Now that Facebook will own Oculus, are you still going to buy an Oculus Rift?  

116 members have voted

  1. 1. Now that Facebook will own Oculus, are you still going to buy an Oculus Rift?

    • Yes
    • I was going to but now that Facebook owns them i'm not
    • I was never going to buy one
    • I might buy one
    • I was never gong to buy one but if I was going to buy it I wouldn't care if facebook owned them or not.


Recommended Posts

To further support Pupik's post:

When it came to Oculus' business model, he (Zuckerberg) said Facebook wasn't interested in making money on the Oculus Rift hardware; the revenue, he said, would come from other places. "We view this as a software and services thing," he said. "If this becomes a network where people can be communicating and buying things and virtual goods, and there might be advertising in the world, but we need to figure that out down the line." Zuckerberg didn't go into specifics, but it's easy to imagine shopping malls popping up in the virtual landscape.

Source: Engadget "Can Oculus survive the Facebook effect?"

http://techreport.com/news/26229/updated-oculus-headset-may-get-facebook-rebrand-price-cut 

We have not gotten into all the details yet, but a lot of the news is coming. The key points:
1) We can make custom hardware, not rely on the scraps of the mobile phone industry. That is insanely expensive, think hundreds of millions of dollars. More news soon.
2) We can afford to hire everyone we need, the best people that fit into our culture of excellence in all aspects.
3) We can make huge investments in content. More news soon.

 

Luckey went on to note, "This deal specifically lets us greatly lower the price of the Rift."

I find it interesting how for some people the response to somebody else not liking a product is to get upset at them and call them names ("You don't like Facebook, we'll you're just on a hate bandwagon and you're totally going to buy it anyway") I've been told for years and years that I was "anti-social" for not having a Facebook account, surprisingly I still don't have a Facebook account even though people told me over and over again that I'd "break down and create one".

Any interest I had in the Rift is gone now, and that's not going to change just because people call me childish for not liking something.

  • Like 3

I find it interesting how for some people the response to somebody else not liking a product is to get upset at them and call them names ("You don't like Facebook, we'll you're just on a hate bandwagon and you're totally going to buy it anyway") I've been told for years and years that I was "anti-social" for not having a Facebook account, surprisingly I still don't have a Facebook account even though people told me over and over again that I'd "break down and create one".

Any interest I had in the Rift is gone now, and that's not going to change just because people call me childish for not liking something.

 

Do people still do the idiotic "You don't use Facebook? You must not have any friends then." ? I haven't heard it in about a year or so myself.

I'm much more excited for the consumer version now that Oculus have the financial backing of Facebook.. the device that ships will be 3 times as good as it would have.

 

They will be able to design and produce custom hardware specifically for use in the Rift.  At the very least that will improve performance and packaging of the device.

 

I'm still considering going halves with someone in a DK2 to test apps that have already been made, I think it would be interesting to try and turn a picture of my actual desk into a background for a virtual desktop.  I also think that panoramic video calling would be pretty nifty, even if a gimmick.

 

I secretly hope that the consumer version will ship with a slightly wider FOV though, cutting out peripheral vision completely sucks out some of the immersion factor.

  • Like 2

Love the idea that people won`t buy this now as Facebook has bought them.

Sure,

Cause it`s not as if larger companies buy up smaller companies and do this exact thing all the time.

I,ll bet there are several companies out there now that are owned by some "Evil" company, that folk on here are happily buying into.

In fact MS, Sony and Apple all come to mind.

 

I'm much more excited for the consumer version now that Oculus have the financial backing of Facebook.. the device that ships will be 3 times as good as it would have.

 

They will be able to design and produce custom hardware specifically for use in the Rift.  At the very least that will improve performance and packaging of the device.

 

I'm still considering going halves with someone in a DK2 to test apps that have already been made, I think it would be interesting to try and turn a picture of my actual desk into a background for a virtual desktop.  I also think that panoramic video calling would be pretty nifty, even if a gimmick.

 

I secretly hope that the consumer version will ship with a slightly wider FOV though, cutting out peripheral vision completely sucks out some of the immersion factor.

 

So you want a video call where you can see all the other callers in a virtual environment where you turn around and all the video feeds are lined up side by side.... and they're all wearing a huge OR visor :p

I find it interesting how for some people the response to somebody else not liking a product is to get upset at them and call them names ("You don't like Facebook, we'll you're just on a hate bandwagon and you're totally going to buy it anyway") I've been told for years and years that I was "anti-social" for not having a Facebook account, surprisingly I still don't have a Facebook account even though people told me over and over again that I'd "break down and create one".

Any interest I had in the Rift is gone now, and that's not going to change just because people call me childish for not liking something.

 

 

So. just because Facebook owns them, and there will be a tiny embossed Facebook logo on the hardware and they might make their own virtual world social network thing for it, that would be completely optional to use you're not going to buy it. Even after all the cool games you where waiting for when the Rift was independent are released with OR support all the big AAA games are released with OR support. even after that perfect OR game is released....  even after that you're still gonna sit there saying "no, facebook owns them, I won't buy. I don't care if the hardware is awesome and it has lots of great game support. I won't buy it because FB owns them and they have this program i 'can' use on it" ?

Hell, if Microsoft made the purchase, I'd be downright excited and would argue that it could be a game changer in allowing Sony to have some real competition which would allow for us to see continued improvements to the tech.

 

Can't argue with that.

 

 

See this exactly what i'm getting at. That sort of financial backing is going to see huge improvements in hardware and software.

My only concern would be that the purchase by Facebook would make gaming a secondary focus. I have no idea how this might occur (as presumably hardware advancements, etc. should benefit games), but I can imagine that the purchase by Facebook means that they want at least some level of integration (eventually) with their flagship product. That I am not interested in, especially if this becomes mandatory (over the longer term, perhaps). 

My only concern would be that the purchase by Facebook would make gaming a secondary focus. I have no idea how this might occur (as presumably hardware advancements, etc. should benefit games), but I can imagine that the purchase by Facebook means that they want at least some level of integration (eventually) with their flagship product. That I am not interested in, especially if this becomes mandatory (over the longer term, perhaps). 

 

Again, this is a hardware product.

 

even if they make an app allowing you to do some facebook stuff ont he rift, this has NO effect on the rift in games...

 

it'd be like if FB boughta high end monitor company and slashed the prices and people refused to buy the monitors because you could... load fecaebook on them and facebook owns the company... it's just ... stupid...

So you want a video call where you can see all the other callers in a virtual environment where you turn around and all the video feeds are lined up side by side.... and they're all wearing a huge OR visor :p

 

Good point, I guess I meant.. more a conference where the other party doesn't have a headset on haha.

Again, this is a hardware product.

 

even if they make an app allowing you to do some facebook stuff ont he rift, this has NO effect on the rift in games...

 

it'd be like if FB boughta high end monitor company and slashed the prices and people refused to buy the monitors because you could... load fecaebook on them and facebook owns the company... it's just ... stupid...

 

Even though this is a hardware product, I wouldn't compare it to a monitor, I'd compare it more to a cell-phone. I get the impression that Facebook would want to turn the Rift into an experience by itself, without the need for games as the primary feature; i.e. the ability to use the Rift as a game monitor becomes secondary to the other features (both hardware and software) that will inevitably come, thereby degrading it's performance as a gaming product. 

 

I mean, I see little chance of the Rift ever staying as a simple monitor that you plug in to your PC/console/whatever. And unlike, say, the Xbox's multimedia vision (games + media) where the media features of the console can and do complement the gaming functionality, I struggle to see the additional benefits that can be brought to the Rift, a device which was designed to be the 'purest' embodiment of a virtual reality interface for gaming.

 

Hell, even the Xbox is struggling to add features without garnering bad press. I have less faith in Facebook than Microsoft.

Except at the end of the day, the Rift is just a monitor with some sensors that track positioning. there's no processing power in the Rift it's the PC that does all the work. even if the Rift where to have drivers that forced FB popup adds for some reason which would never happen. You would have hacked and modified drivers within a day. 

My only concern would be that the purchase by Facebook would make gaming a secondary focus. I have no idea how this might occur (as presumably hardware advancements, etc. should benefit games), but I can imagine that the purchase by Facebook means that they want at least some level of integration (eventually) with their flagship product. That I am not interested in, especially if this becomes mandatory (over the longer term, perhaps). 

 

i get what you're saying but gaming isn't the focus here.. it is VR.. sure gaming lends well to it.. but so do other applications, which could suit Facebook.  If they make it great for games, it will work in other ways equally as good.

I am actually happy facebook bought it. Now it has the backing to actually do something. How long has it been around with little to no progress? It was a turtle crawl tech idea and now it will be given a huge boost forward. To cry about facebook owning it is just plain old silly.

  • Like 2

i get what you're saying but gaming isn't the focus here.. it is VR.. sure gaming lends well to it.. but so do other applications, which could suit Facebook.  If they make it great for games, it will work in other ways equally as good.

 

One of my favourite things to do on my mates dev kit was to watch movies. The cinema program was awesome. Better than going to the real cinema as the screen felt much bigger and there were no other people ruining the film for me :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Dell 27 inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor is really cheap after a very long time by Sayan Sen Recently we covered a really good deal on an AMD RX 9070 three-fan model that's available at slightly above its MSRP. If you are looking for a GPU for 1440p gaming that's around the performance of the Nvidia RTX 5070 you should most definitely check it out. Let's say that you are looking for a monitor to pair that up with too. The Samsung 49" G9 curved QD-OLED superultrawide is a good option that can provide an immersive experience. However despite being a very good deal currently (at $855), it may seem unaffordable to you, or you may simply not want to spend as much on a monitor. In that case Dell's S2725QS can be a very good option as it's on sale at the moment for its lowest price in over six months (purchase link under the specs table down below). The big highlight of the Dell S2725QS is its 27-inch IPS panel with a 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) resolution, offering a high pixel density that can make text appear sharper while also providing plenty of screen space for productivity and media consumption. The display supports a refresh rate of up to 120Hz through both HDMI and DisplayPort, making it suitable not only for everyday desktop use but also for smoother gaming and scrolling. AMD FreeSync Premium support is included as well, helping reduce screen tearing during gaming sessions. The screen has fairly good brightness and color accuracy so you can use it for general work purpose, though photo/video editing is probably not going to be the best match for this. The technical specs of the Dell S2725QS are given in the table below: Specification Value Viewable Screen Size 27 in (68.58 cm) Screen Mode 4K UHD Maximum Resolution 3840 × 2160 Maximum Preset Resolution 3840 × 2160 @ 120 Hz Standard Refresh Rate 120 Hz Panel Technology In-plane Switching (IPS) Backlight Technology LED Edgelight System Pixel Density 163 PPI Response Time 8 ms GTG, 5 ms GTG, 4 ms GTG Horizontal Viewing Angle 178° Vertical Viewing Angle 178° Brightness 350 cd/m² (nits) Native Contrast Ratio 1500:1 Color Support 1.07 Billion Colors Color Gamut 99% sRGB (CIE 1931) Adaptive Sync AMD FreeSync Premium HDCP Support Yes Mount Type Panel Mount VESA Mount 100 × 100 mm Maximum Height Adjustment 13 cm Tilt -5° to 21° Swivel -30° to 30° Pivot ±90° Stand Adjustments Tilt, Swivel, Height, Pivot Glass Hardness 3H Horizontal Frequency 27–270 kHz (DisplayPort 1.4 / HDMI 2.1) Vertical Frequency 48–120 Hz (DisplayPort 1.4 / HDMI 2.1) Video Inputs 2 × HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 1.4 & 2.3), 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 (HDCP 1.4 & 2.3) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Storage Temperature -20°C to 60°C Operating Humidity 10%–80% (Non-condensing) Storage Humidity 5%–95% (Non-condensing) Get it at the link below: Dell S2725QS 27-inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor: $218.49 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $280) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Looks almost like what our office provides us, excluding the leg rest for obvious reasons 😴
    • Forget the iPhone. What about Android? Most Samsung Galaxy phones sold in the USA are manufactured in Vietnam. Asian countries have the infrastructure that the USA doesn't have. This is why most electronics are not made in the USA
    • The RAM would still probably be more expensive than what they were paying last year.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      231
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      macoman
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!