Now that Facebook will own Oculus, are you going to buy an Oculus Rift?


Now that Facebook will own Oculus, are you still going to buy an Oculus Rift?  

116 members have voted

  1. 1. Now that Facebook will own Oculus, are you still going to buy an Oculus Rift?

    • Yes
    • I was going to but now that Facebook owns them i'm not
    • I was never going to buy one
    • I might buy one
    • I was never gong to buy one but if I was going to buy it I wouldn't care if facebook owned them or not.


Recommended Posts

To further support Pupik's post:

When it came to Oculus' business model, he (Zuckerberg) said Facebook wasn't interested in making money on the Oculus Rift hardware; the revenue, he said, would come from other places. "We view this as a software and services thing," he said. "If this becomes a network where people can be communicating and buying things and virtual goods, and there might be advertising in the world, but we need to figure that out down the line." Zuckerberg didn't go into specifics, but it's easy to imagine shopping malls popping up in the virtual landscape.

Source: Engadget "Can Oculus survive the Facebook effect?"

http://techreport.com/news/26229/updated-oculus-headset-may-get-facebook-rebrand-price-cut 

We have not gotten into all the details yet, but a lot of the news is coming. The key points:
1) We can make custom hardware, not rely on the scraps of the mobile phone industry. That is insanely expensive, think hundreds of millions of dollars. More news soon.
2) We can afford to hire everyone we need, the best people that fit into our culture of excellence in all aspects.
3) We can make huge investments in content. More news soon.

 

Luckey went on to note, "This deal specifically lets us greatly lower the price of the Rift."

I find it interesting how for some people the response to somebody else not liking a product is to get upset at them and call them names ("You don't like Facebook, we'll you're just on a hate bandwagon and you're totally going to buy it anyway") I've been told for years and years that I was "anti-social" for not having a Facebook account, surprisingly I still don't have a Facebook account even though people told me over and over again that I'd "break down and create one".

Any interest I had in the Rift is gone now, and that's not going to change just because people call me childish for not liking something.

  • Like 3

I find it interesting how for some people the response to somebody else not liking a product is to get upset at them and call them names ("You don't like Facebook, we'll you're just on a hate bandwagon and you're totally going to buy it anyway") I've been told for years and years that I was "anti-social" for not having a Facebook account, surprisingly I still don't have a Facebook account even though people told me over and over again that I'd "break down and create one".

Any interest I had in the Rift is gone now, and that's not going to change just because people call me childish for not liking something.

 

Do people still do the idiotic "You don't use Facebook? You must not have any friends then." ? I haven't heard it in about a year or so myself.

I'm much more excited for the consumer version now that Oculus have the financial backing of Facebook.. the device that ships will be 3 times as good as it would have.

 

They will be able to design and produce custom hardware specifically for use in the Rift.  At the very least that will improve performance and packaging of the device.

 

I'm still considering going halves with someone in a DK2 to test apps that have already been made, I think it would be interesting to try and turn a picture of my actual desk into a background for a virtual desktop.  I also think that panoramic video calling would be pretty nifty, even if a gimmick.

 

I secretly hope that the consumer version will ship with a slightly wider FOV though, cutting out peripheral vision completely sucks out some of the immersion factor.

  • Like 2

Love the idea that people won`t buy this now as Facebook has bought them.

Sure,

Cause it`s not as if larger companies buy up smaller companies and do this exact thing all the time.

I,ll bet there are several companies out there now that are owned by some "Evil" company, that folk on here are happily buying into.

In fact MS, Sony and Apple all come to mind.

 

I'm much more excited for the consumer version now that Oculus have the financial backing of Facebook.. the device that ships will be 3 times as good as it would have.

 

They will be able to design and produce custom hardware specifically for use in the Rift.  At the very least that will improve performance and packaging of the device.

 

I'm still considering going halves with someone in a DK2 to test apps that have already been made, I think it would be interesting to try and turn a picture of my actual desk into a background for a virtual desktop.  I also think that panoramic video calling would be pretty nifty, even if a gimmick.

 

I secretly hope that the consumer version will ship with a slightly wider FOV though, cutting out peripheral vision completely sucks out some of the immersion factor.

 

So you want a video call where you can see all the other callers in a virtual environment where you turn around and all the video feeds are lined up side by side.... and they're all wearing a huge OR visor :p

I find it interesting how for some people the response to somebody else not liking a product is to get upset at them and call them names ("You don't like Facebook, we'll you're just on a hate bandwagon and you're totally going to buy it anyway") I've been told for years and years that I was "anti-social" for not having a Facebook account, surprisingly I still don't have a Facebook account even though people told me over and over again that I'd "break down and create one".

Any interest I had in the Rift is gone now, and that's not going to change just because people call me childish for not liking something.

 

 

So. just because Facebook owns them, and there will be a tiny embossed Facebook logo on the hardware and they might make their own virtual world social network thing for it, that would be completely optional to use you're not going to buy it. Even after all the cool games you where waiting for when the Rift was independent are released with OR support all the big AAA games are released with OR support. even after that perfect OR game is released....  even after that you're still gonna sit there saying "no, facebook owns them, I won't buy. I don't care if the hardware is awesome and it has lots of great game support. I won't buy it because FB owns them and they have this program i 'can' use on it" ?

Hell, if Microsoft made the purchase, I'd be downright excited and would argue that it could be a game changer in allowing Sony to have some real competition which would allow for us to see continued improvements to the tech.

 

Can't argue with that.

 

 

See this exactly what i'm getting at. That sort of financial backing is going to see huge improvements in hardware and software.

My only concern would be that the purchase by Facebook would make gaming a secondary focus. I have no idea how this might occur (as presumably hardware advancements, etc. should benefit games), but I can imagine that the purchase by Facebook means that they want at least some level of integration (eventually) with their flagship product. That I am not interested in, especially if this becomes mandatory (over the longer term, perhaps). 

My only concern would be that the purchase by Facebook would make gaming a secondary focus. I have no idea how this might occur (as presumably hardware advancements, etc. should benefit games), but I can imagine that the purchase by Facebook means that they want at least some level of integration (eventually) with their flagship product. That I am not interested in, especially if this becomes mandatory (over the longer term, perhaps). 

 

Again, this is a hardware product.

 

even if they make an app allowing you to do some facebook stuff ont he rift, this has NO effect on the rift in games...

 

it'd be like if FB boughta high end monitor company and slashed the prices and people refused to buy the monitors because you could... load fecaebook on them and facebook owns the company... it's just ... stupid...

So you want a video call where you can see all the other callers in a virtual environment where you turn around and all the video feeds are lined up side by side.... and they're all wearing a huge OR visor :p

 

Good point, I guess I meant.. more a conference where the other party doesn't have a headset on haha.

Again, this is a hardware product.

 

even if they make an app allowing you to do some facebook stuff ont he rift, this has NO effect on the rift in games...

 

it'd be like if FB boughta high end monitor company and slashed the prices and people refused to buy the monitors because you could... load fecaebook on them and facebook owns the company... it's just ... stupid...

 

Even though this is a hardware product, I wouldn't compare it to a monitor, I'd compare it more to a cell-phone. I get the impression that Facebook would want to turn the Rift into an experience by itself, without the need for games as the primary feature; i.e. the ability to use the Rift as a game monitor becomes secondary to the other features (both hardware and software) that will inevitably come, thereby degrading it's performance as a gaming product. 

 

I mean, I see little chance of the Rift ever staying as a simple monitor that you plug in to your PC/console/whatever. And unlike, say, the Xbox's multimedia vision (games + media) where the media features of the console can and do complement the gaming functionality, I struggle to see the additional benefits that can be brought to the Rift, a device which was designed to be the 'purest' embodiment of a virtual reality interface for gaming.

 

Hell, even the Xbox is struggling to add features without garnering bad press. I have less faith in Facebook than Microsoft.

Except at the end of the day, the Rift is just a monitor with some sensors that track positioning. there's no processing power in the Rift it's the PC that does all the work. even if the Rift where to have drivers that forced FB popup adds for some reason which would never happen. You would have hacked and modified drivers within a day. 

My only concern would be that the purchase by Facebook would make gaming a secondary focus. I have no idea how this might occur (as presumably hardware advancements, etc. should benefit games), but I can imagine that the purchase by Facebook means that they want at least some level of integration (eventually) with their flagship product. That I am not interested in, especially if this becomes mandatory (over the longer term, perhaps). 

 

i get what you're saying but gaming isn't the focus here.. it is VR.. sure gaming lends well to it.. but so do other applications, which could suit Facebook.  If they make it great for games, it will work in other ways equally as good.

I am actually happy facebook bought it. Now it has the backing to actually do something. How long has it been around with little to no progress? It was a turtle crawl tech idea and now it will be given a huge boost forward. To cry about facebook owning it is just plain old silly.

  • Like 2

i get what you're saying but gaming isn't the focus here.. it is VR.. sure gaming lends well to it.. but so do other applications, which could suit Facebook.  If they make it great for games, it will work in other ways equally as good.

 

One of my favourite things to do on my mates dev kit was to watch movies. The cinema program was awesome. Better than going to the real cinema as the screen felt much bigger and there were no other people ruining the film for me :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!