Recommended Posts

do you have both the old testament and king james versions?

 

Hi Xerino,

 

Yes, the old testament in king james version is available.  There are six translations of the Bible to choose from and I made it part of the app package so you don't need the internet to read them. Here is a screenshot of the preference panel under the app settings.  I'm hoping to sell enough of the app so I can afford copyrighted translations like the NIV. 

 

101.png

Wow! All windows 8 apps should lol this nice..

 

Thanks Blade1269.  Have to say though, there's a reason why there's not a lot of good apps in Windows, there's not a whole lot of market on the Windows Store.  I've been getting some really good feedbacks and ratings from people who buy my app but since it launched last year, April 2013, this app has made $180.  Microsoft only gives payout for apps that makes $200 and above so I really haven't made any money with this app.  But that's ok, because I use this app myself and I believe that I'm not just making a good Bible app for everyone else, I am making a good Bible app for me too. 

  • 4 weeks later...

That is SO cool. Congratulations for making that. I wish it was available in other languages like French. If I could browse the J?rusalem or New Liturgical Translation I think I'd be tempted to buy a Windows tablet just for that.

Thanks.  I'm constantly looking for copyright free data source to add Bible translations/commentary/dictionary but so far I have not found any besides the once I already have.

Not a huge fan of religion, but your app looks really nicely done and professional.  Have you considered releasing it for sale on other platforms?  Ubuntu supports "for sale" and proprietary software through their Ubuntu software center, and Apple has the Mac App Store as well.

Not a huge fan of religion, but your app looks really nicely done and professional.  Have you considered releasing it for sale on other platforms?  Ubuntu supports "for sale" and proprietary software through their Ubuntu software center, and Apple has the Mac App Store as well.

 

Thanks Gerowen, I took some time considering the financial benefit of releasing to other platforms specially with the low market on windows ecosystem - as I mentioned this app's combined income from windows 8 and windows 8.1 over the 1 year that it has been available did not even meet Microsoft payout quota. But, between my daytime job and family I haven't had time to start working on developing on other platforms.  I use my spare time providing update for the windows version and on the next release I'll be expanding to windows phone via universal apps.  Another issue I have is my location, I live in a small mining town in Australia and for the past 7 years that I've been living here, I have never met another programmer.  It would be great if I had a team of my peers, but for now, it's just me.  But, I have a spare iMac so maybe on my next holiday when I get enough free time I'll release an iPad version.

Hi Xerino,

 

Yes, the old testament in king james version is available.  There are six translations of the Bible to choose from and I made it part of the app package so you don't need the internet to read them. Here is a screenshot of the preference panel under the app settings.  I'm hoping to sell enough of the app so I can afford copyrighted translations like the NIV. 

 

101.png

I wouldn't bother including some of those translations of the bible. They have been changed and contain incorrect stuff. Check this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFtI_mVOXbQ. Also why is it called freak bible?

Bought your app as it looks great and it sounds like you need the support :)  Not sure the best way to promote an app like this, but it's a gorgeous app and I wish you best of luck with it.  Maybe think about making it a universal (Windows 8/WP8) app. 

 

EDIT: is there a search function? 

While this is something I would never use (as I don't like religion) it is a very well rounded application, and a few of the other developers could learn a thing or two from a useability standpoint from it.

Thanks.  I'm constantly looking for copyright free data source to add Bible translations/commentary/dictionary but so far I have not found any besides the once I already have.

Are you considering adding translations in other languages than English? It'd be worth asking the AELF for permission to use their liturgical translation, I have no idea what they would say but you lose nothing to ask I guess.

I wouldn't bother including some of those translations of the bible. They have been changed and contain incorrect stuff. Check this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFtI_mVOXbQ. Also why is it called freak bible?

Hi Soldiers33,  I am very much aware of this.  Having missing verses on some translations is not only bad theology but it's also bad for the database schema.  But, including these translations will allow users to actually validate for themselves that these changes have been made.  Most Christians are not aware that such issues exist.  I used the name "freakbible" because like most Christians, we often get bullied for our beliefs and one of the names they use to call me that got stuck with me is "biblefreak".  So, I thought that since "biblefreak" refers to the person, I would make up a name that refers to that person's Bible thus "freakbible - the biblefreak's Bible" :). 

 

Bought your app as it looks great and it sounds like you need the support :)  Not sure the best way to promote an app like this, but it's a gorgeous app and I wish you best of luck with it.  Maybe think about making it a universal (Windows 8/WP8) app. 

 

EDIT: is there a search function? 

Hi Siah1214,  Thank you for buying the app.  I'm glad that you like it.  I've started working on the WP8.1 version of the app and should be available soon for free to users who have already bought the Windows version.  Search functionality is not yet available but I would definitely include it in the coming updates.  I often release updates on the features and capabilities of the app and most of those updates are based on customer feedback.  I make it a point that the users have a say on what feature gets included for each release so feel free to contact me here or via email at support@freakbible.com and I'll make sure to consider your request during development.

 

While this is something I would never use (as I don't like religion) it is a very well rounded application, and a few of the other developers could learn a thing or two from a useability standpoint from it.

Thanks Ph1b3r0pt1c,  Your positive feedback means a lot for indie developers like me.  I read feedbacks and reviews like yours during development to keep me motivated in releasing updates for the app.

 

It would be nice if you included the original Hebrew and Greek texts.

Hi msr714, Hebrew and Greek text certainly would be a great addition to the app.  Rest assured that I am continually working on finding copyright free material to include in the app.  References like Bible translations, commentaries and dictionaries will be included in future updates of the app.

 

Are you considering adding translations in other languages than English? It'd be worth asking the AELF for permission to use their liturgical translation, I have no idea what they would say but you lose nothing to ask I guess.

Hi Andre,  I took your advice, went to their website and sent them a message on their website's contact form.  Crossing my fingers now.  Hoping they would reply in English.  :D

 

It would be great to see the ESV and NASB on there. I know the ESV has an API for online reading.

 Hi jkenn99,  ESV have similar Copyright and Permissions Information as other translations owned by Crossway.  Although they have an online API, I would prefer that users of my app would be able to read the Bible even if internet connection was not available.  I grew up in the company of missionaries and most of the time, they are in places where the internet is not always accessible.  Providing them a local copy of the Bible allows the app to be useful on such places.  But, having an online only translation for verses they select would be a great feature for the app and would bypass most copyright requirements.  Thanks for the idea, I'll work on how this can be implemented on the UI/UX.  I may need to do more research on this just to make sure that I am not breaking any copyright laws.

  • 8 months later...

As many others have said, I am not a fan of religion, in fact, the only thing I am religious about is not being religious - aside from that - its nice looking.  Aesthetically, it is one of the nicest Ive seen.  You are a good example of something I tell people all the time:  it takes more than just someone who can write code to make good looking website/app - you have to know what looks good and what doesnt - you have to be part artist, part programmer.

 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • At this point, stating the obvious feels like a public service... 😅
    • Saw it last night; it was OK; maybe 6 out of 10. I'm not familiar enough with the comics to be familiar with the other Justice Gang characters or the pocket universe so that part was boring. Its really just rehashing the same tired concepts, Lois, evil Lex, Daily Planet. They just updated it with stuff about selfies, Jimmy Olsen posting stuff on the web, and the dog, etc. David Corenswet will be the second most likeable after Christopher Reeve. Unfortunately I'm old enough to have seen the original 1950's TV shows so this doesn't do much for me. Zack Snyder did it better.
    • Synology BeeStation Plus review: a worthy upgrade from the original by Christopher White Last year, Synology released a new product called the BeeStation, a small device with a single 4TB drive that allowed people to automatically backup their photos and videos from a mobile device to the BeeStation with a minimal amount of effort. At only $199 (now $219), it was a great way to get family members to backup their devices, but it had some shortcomings that you can read about in the review I wrote. I highly recommend taking a look because most of the functionality between devices is the same, and there are pieces I won't be repeating in this review. A year later, it's clear that the BeeStation was a successful product for Synology because they've now released BST170-8T, or the BeeStation Plus, as I'll refer to it throughout this review. So, what is the BeeStation Plus? At its most basic, it's a single hard drive inside of an enclosure that, once set up, allows you to access the data from anywhere in the world, but keeps all of your data self-hosted. Think of it like a personal Google Drive. In addition to normal files and images, the BeeStation Plus focuses heavily on pictures and has some AI capabilities to help categorize photos automatically. The main difference between the original and the Plus, from a software perspective, is that the Plus supports running a Plex server so that it can act as a media server in your home as well. Specifications The BeeStation and BeeStation Plus are very similar to each other. In fact, if you put the two devices next to each other, there's no way to visually identify the difference between the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus. So what's different between the two models? The CPU is better, the system has more memory, and a larger hard drive, but otherwise is functionally the same. BeeStation (BST150-4T) BeeStation Plus (BST1170-8T) CPU Realtek RTD1619B Intel Celeron J4125, Quad-Core Memory 1 GB DDR4 4GB DDR4 (non-upgradable) Disk Capacity 4 TB (Synology HAT3300) 8 TB (Synology HAT3310) Network 1 RJ-45 1 GbE 1 RJ-45 1 GbE USB Ports 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbit), 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbit) 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbit), 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 (5Gbit) Size (H/W/D) 5.8 x 2.5 x 7.7 inches / 148.0 x 62.6 x 196.3 mm 5.8 x 2.5 x 7.7 inches / 148.0 x 62.6 x 196.3 mm Weight 1.8 pounds / 820 grams 2.65 pounds / 1200 grams Warranty 3 years 3 years Price $219.99 on Amazon $409.99 on Amazon Synology has doubled the storage capacity and quadrupled the RAM, but the major update to the BeeStation Plus is the inclusion of the Intel Celeron J4125. Putting an x86 processor in a personal storage device. The device still has a single 1GbE port, a single USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 port (5Gbit), and a single USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 port (5Gbit). There's a power button and a reset button on the back, and a single activity light on the front. Noticeably missing is a Kensington lock, something that's been standard on NAS devices for many years. I suspect that, being a dedicated home device, Synology didn't see the need to include one. The BeeStation Plus does not include a user-replaceable hard drive as the device has no exposed screws. This makes for a sleek look, but means that users cannot upgrade the system themselves. I'm not sure what this means when the drive dies, but I assume Synology will end up shipping a new unit if it is still under warranty. Synology DSM vs BSM If you've used a Synology NAS in the past, you'll know that it runs DiskStation Manager, a full-fledged OS that makes managing storage a relatively straightforward process but still requires a level of technical understanding around building storage pools, volumes, picking disk protection levels, configuring networking, and such. On the other hand, Synology BeeStations use BSM, or BeeStation Manager. This is similar to DSM, but is stripped down to only the bare minimum in order to streamline usage and make it easy for anyone to set up and manage. If you're a power user, you might feel a bit constrained, but for "regular" people, the ability to have a server in your house without needing to understand anything is a key selling point of the product. Hardware Installation The BeeStation Plus, like its predecessor, was designed to be easy to set up and start using immediately. As such, the hardware installation is a breeze as there's nothing to do other than connect an Ethernet cable to the RJ-45 port, connect the external power adapter to the device, plug it into the wall, and push the power button. The hard drive comes pre-installed, so there's nothing else for the user to do. Initial Setup and Configuration The initial setup is exactly the same as the original BeeStation, which makes sense since both run the same version of BSM. If you're interested in seeing the process, check out the review of the BeeStation from last year, since it's exactly the same. Applications The BeeStation Plus supports the same applications as the original - namely, BeePhotos and BeeFiles - so that you can centralize your photos, have AI identify faces and items, and share files across your network or the Internet. I won't rehash these applications since they're the same as the previous review. The BeeStation Plus adds the ability to install Plex in order to use the device as a media server. In order to install Plex, go to the System Settings section, click on Integrations at the bottom, and then click the Install button. The version is a little behind the most recent on the Plex server, but it's relatively up to date. That said, there isn't a way to manually update the installation. I began my review at the beginning of June, and now, in the middle of July, it's running the same version of Plex, so it's something to keep an eye on going forward. Gallery: Plex on BeeStation Plus Once Plex is running, there will be a new folder called Plex Media Library where you can upload your media. Then simply use the standard Plex interface to set up a name, configure the libraries, and start sharing your media. The good news is that, due to the Intel Celeron J4125 processor, you can use hardware transcoding with your videos, assuming you have purchased a Plex Pass. I was able to have a couple of 4k streams transcoding at once, but things started to buffer a bit when I added a third stream. For those who prefer Jellyfin or Embry, you're out of luck. If you're interested in cutting the cord, take a look at the article I wrote about cutting the cord and replacing it with Plex, HDHomeRun, and a NAS device, something you could do with the BeeStation Plus. Updates from the original BeeStation One of the biggest limitations of the original BeeStation was around backups. Your backup options were either a directly connected USB drive or Synology's C2 Storage system. With the latest version of the BSM operating system, Synology has added the ability to backup to a remote NAS using Hyper Backup, and the company includes comprehensive documentation on the process. This is a welcome upgrade, and, because it's an operating system function, is available on the original BeeStation as well. Since both BeeStation models have a single hard drive, backups are critical to implement. Aside from backups, I didn't see many changes from the original BeeStation. Considering the OS is the same between the two devices, it's not surprising. The pace of OS releases is also relatively slow: The BeeStation Plus has received only one update in its life, and that was to update the version of BeeFiles, BeePhotos, and add support for Plex. That said, the device is also rock solid. I haven't seen a single crash and things work the way they're supposed to, even if it isn't as full-featured as I would like, but I have to remember that the target market for this device isn't power users of NAS devices, it's people who want an easy way to centralize their media and, to a lesser extent, their files. Limitations Unfortunately, BSM still has the same limitation it had before regarding using the device as a family media device: Only the user who uploads their data can see it from a filesystem perspective, and there's no option to change that. My use case was to install software on my wife's phone so that all of her photos are centrally backed up and I can then manage the photos from the BeeStation Plus, but the way BSM is implemented, nobody but her can see the files. I appreciate that as a base configuration, but I wish there were a way to change it. That said, there is a workaround, although it's a bit of a kludge. If you create a Hyper Backup to a USB or remote Synology device, you can then restore that backup and have full access to all of the files. That's even more of a reason, in my opinion, to let users decide whether the admin can have full access to the uploaded files. The mobile app still has the same issue, where you can't create conditional albums. I still can't figure out why the web application would have more functionality, and it is something I thought Synology would've fixed from my last review, but alas, they have not. Conclusion The BeeStation Plus (and its predecessor) are pretty cool devices that fit a specific market segment, namely those who want a plug-and-play device to back up their photos. The only real addition the Plus adds over the original is the ability to run Plex on it to act as your central media platform. If you have no interest in videos, the original BeeStation is still a great device that can back up your phone and other devices. If you're looking for a Plex server and don't want to mess with building your own server or the extra cost/complications of a dedicated NAS server, the BeeStation Plus is a great solution that will address your needs. I'm very happy to see that Synology has allowed Hyper Backups between devices now, as being forced into the C2 Storage lane seems counter to those who want to keep control of their own data. That said, I really wish Synology would open up the permissions to give direct filesystem-level access to everyone's files. The fact that, a year later, I still can't set up a Conditional Album to have an entire family's photos from a vacation be put into a single location is a major failed use case in my opinion. If you want to use Plex, the BeeStation Plus is a great device for a reasonable price, now available on Amazon for $409.99. If you don't need Plex and the ability to transcode videos, then save yourself some money and buy an original BeeStation. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's no one's fault, it's a situation where Microsoft wants one thing and the hardware lacks it, period, this isn't a matter of who to blame or not. At some point after the 7000 series came out, Microsoft decided that VBS should be standard on Windows 11, and to run VBS they needed MBEC (Intel) or GMET (AMD), so to the official hardware requirements it goes.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      MacDaddyAz went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Year In
      MacDaddyAz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      BruceG-69 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      RSMurphy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      RSMurphy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      246
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      209
    4. 4
      Xenon
      131
    5. 5
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      118
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!