Heart attacks spike following start of daylight saving time, US study finds


Recommended Posts

It's worth noting that if you already have existing heart conditions or other serious health issues the time change might have detrimental effects. An otherwise healthy person wouldn't be affected. It said this in the article:

 

 

"It may mean that people who are already vulnerable to heart disease may be at greater risk right after sudden time changes."

 

 

 

But, you know, just dismiss the entire study because you don't "get it".

How does DST save energy? For a couple weeks, we're back to having to turn the lights on when we first get up, and turn them on a little later in the evening  . . . Yay?

 

I hate the fact that it's finally light out when I get up for work, and then after DST kicks in, it's suddenly dark again. Very depressing.

 

I don't know that it ever actually saved any energy, and it certainly doesn't these days.

This is taken from a site about DST random facts.

How much energy does Daylight Saving Time save? In 2008, Energy Department experts studied the impact of the extended Daylight Saving Time on energy consumption in the U.S. and found that the extra four weeks of Daylight Saving Time saved about 0.5 percent in total electricity per day. While this might not sound like a lot, it adds up to electricity savings of 1.3 billion kilowatt-hours -- or the amount of electricity used by more than 100,000 households for an entire year. These electricity savings generally occur during a three- to five-hour period in the evening. To learn how you can save energy during Daylight Saving Time, visit Energy Saver.

What does Monday have to do with anything here? The clock changes between Saturday and Sunday not Sunday and Monday. The only thing DST does is confuse people but spiking heart attacks? C'mon.

 

Also, I can't understand the link between DST and sleep - you still sleep the same amount as you would without it. At least most people are.

How does DST save energy? For a couple weeks, we're back to having to turn the lights on when we first get up, and turn them on a little later in the evening  . . . Yay?

 

I hate the fact that it's finally light out when I get up for work, and then after DST kicks in, it's suddenly dark again. Very depressing.

 

I don't know that it ever actually saved any energy, and it certainly doesn't these days.

 

- 1-2 hours of lights off daily for trillions and trillions of light bulbs

- why would you want it to be be bright out at 11 pm?

- why would you want it to still be dark at 10 am?

 

DST is meant for the masses, not the individual.

- 1-2 hours of lights off daily for trillions and trillions of light bulbs

- why would you want it to be be bright out at 11 pm?

- why would you want it to still be dark at 10 am?

DST is meant for the masses, not the individual.

People here are out late, be it shopping, clubbing, going to the theater or sports events. Dept. stores are also usually open 24/7. This creates a larger victim pool for miscreants. Stats show lower street crime when it's light out or street lights are on.

How is saving energy no longer important?

Aren`t we all moving towards greener lives?

Maybe I dreamt all that stuff about the environment and ozone layer, not as if the polar ice caps are melting or that....

We should not move towards saving energy; but we should make sure it's from a 'green' origin.

- 1-2 hours of lights off daily for trillions and trillions of light bulbs

- why would you want it to be be bright out at 11 pm?

- why would you want it to still be dark at 10 am?

 

DST is meant for the masses, not the individual.

 

But most people get up early for work. Aren't we just increasing the time the lights are on in the early morning?

 

And "Why would you want it to be bright out at 11 PM?" is an argument against DST - it makes sunset relatively later, although the shift isn't great enough to make that happen.

 

And still dark at 10 AM? Even on the shortest day of the year, that doesn't happen.

 

I maintain there's no need for DST, since the days are getting longer in the spring anyway.

 

For years I worked Sundays. So in the spring, I was getting up at what felt like 3:30 AM due to the stupid clock trick. I had no buffer, no day off to adjust. I just lost an hour sleep before work, and that's a big problem when you're a perpetual insomniac.Rather than simply being slightly less well rested, I had far worse sleep deprivation than normal.

 

And without the buffer day to adjust, I felt the effects for days.

 

And I went from it being light when I got up, to still being dark well after when I left for work.

 

The claimed energy savings (which I don't really believe) are a hollow victory IMO when weighed against the sleep deprivation, messed up internal clocks, and other negative factors.

We should not move towards saving energy; but we should make sure it's from a 'green' origin.

"Green" energy is as yet impractical in many locales.

Solar up here near a latitude of 45? and in snow country is problematic, and the economics of wind is far from there (maintenance, noise, RUD, and a short up-time/day.)

Making methane biologically also has cost issues, especially in the US where we have several centuries worth of natural gas under our feet.

Want green power? Support modern nuclear reactor designs, especially molten salt reactors which do not present the meltdown issue (they're already liquid) or coolant loss problems of old reactor designs (which are the ones that have failed.)

Some new reactor designs can even "eat" the spent fuels from older designs, and leave much shorter lived materials. Long term storage problem solved.

People here are out late, be it shopping, clubbing, going to the theater or sports events. Dept. stores are also usually open 24/7. This creates a larger victim pool for miscreants. Stats show lower street crime when it's light out or street lights are on.

 

If stores are open 24/7. then how is there a smaller victim pool during DST? It's still the same amount of darkness. The days get longer in the spring, but DST has absolutely nothing to do with it.

 

And an hour isn't going to make any difference for people who are out late. It'd be dark regardless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!