Recommended Posts

A skydiver in Norway captured incredible video of an extinguished meteorite shooting past him soon after he deployed his parachute, something that has never been seen before, let alone been recorded.

?This is the first time in history that a meteorite has been filmed in the air after its light goes out,? geologist Hans Amundsen told the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, Norway?s largest media organization also know as NRK.

Skydiver Anders Helstrup was lucky. The rock very nearly hit him, it passed so close.

 

?If you?d jumped a fraction of a second later, you?d be dead,? Amundsen told Helstrup in NRK?s report above. ?It would have cut him in half. Imagine a 5-kilo [11-pound] rock hitting you in the chest at 300 kilometers [186 miles] per hour. That would have led to quite an accident investigation.?

 

more

If it was really a meteorite it would have been going alot faster and one of that size would have burnt up in the atmosphere before it even gets as low as that. the image of it just looks like gravel which could have fell from the inside of the plane from when they jumped out.

 

Or they wanted to create some interest and someone threw a few stones out as to generate some media.

  • Like 1

Imagine if it had hit him, I doubt anyone would have thought "meteor" and we'd have a huge conspiracy on our hands.


If it was really a meteorite it would have been going alot faster and one of that size would have burnt up in the atmosphere before it even gets as low as that. the image of it just looks like gravel which could have fell from the inside of the plane from when they jumped out.

 

Or they wanted to create some interest and someone threw a few stones out as to generate some media.

 

It says in the article they think it's part of a larger meteor that exploded in the atmosphere and was low enough to stop glowing.

If it was really a meteorite it would have been going alot faster and one of that size would have burnt up in the atmosphere before it even gets as low as that. the image of it just looks like gravel which could have fell from the inside of the plane from when they jumped out.

 

Or they wanted to create some interest and someone threw a few stones out as to generate some media.

 

The rock wouldn't be going any faster than it's terminal velocity without other forces working on it. so no it woudn't really, remember the skydiver is also still falling fast at this point. 

  • Like 2

I bet this is debris that fell off the plane he just jumped out of

He's in a wing suit. Most likely they've been doing a lot of free fall since jumping and the plane is nowhere near them.

Also not sure what debris would drop from a plane, that size and shape.

To slow i doubt its meteorite :iiam:

 

This is in the lower and denser atmosphere. The rock has had plenty of time to decelerate to its terminal velocity. For perspective, a typical bowling ball has a terminal velocity of less than 200 MPH.

To me, it looked like a little stone swept up when repacking the parachute?

 

Deploy parachute, stone falls out of canopy.

You'd have to be blind and dumb to pack a stone the size of two fists and know know it, it would also have been a lot slower than this then.

You'd have to be blind and dumb to pack a stone the size of two fists and know know it, it would also have been a lot slower than this then.

 

Yeah, just watched it a second time but full screen and watched the slower parts too.

 

I therefore retract my statement haha.

A meteorite that size would've burned when it entered our atmosphere. And if it blew up then where's the explosion and/or other debris.

 

Whatever it is, if it was a meteorite and falling like that. I doubt the rest would've burned up, go find the rock(s)! :) They roughly know where it is, I'd be interested in a meteor slowing down to terminal velocity before it's even near the ground.

A meteorite that size would've burned when it entered our atmosphere. And if it blew up then where's the explosion and/or other debris.

Whatever it is, if it was a meteorite and falling like that. I doubt the rest would've burned up, go find the rock(s)! :) They roughly know where it is, I'd be interested in a meteor slowing down to terminal velocity before it's even near the ground.

It wasn't that size when it entered now was it, it's a fragment of a bigger meteorite. And they generally slow to terminal in the upper atmosphere...

A meteorite that size would've burned when it entered our atmosphere. And if it blew up then where's the explosion and/or other debris.

 

Whatever it is, if it was a meteorite and falling like that. I doubt the rest would've burned up, go find the rock(s)! :) They roughly know where it is, I'd be interested in a meteor slowing down to terminal velocity before it's even near the ground.

 

Meteor fragmentation isn't always spectacular and explosive. Sometimes it just falls apart.

 

American Meteor Society.

Due to atmospheric drag, most meteorites, ranging from a few kilograms up to about 8 tons (7,000 kg), will lose all of their cosmic velocity while still several miles up. At that point, called the retardation point, the meteorite begins to accelerate again, under the influence of the Earth?s gravity, at the familiar 9.8 meters per second squared. The meteorite then quickly reaches its terminal velocity of 200 to 400 miles per hour (90 to 180 meters per second). The terminal velocity occurs at the point where the acceleration due to gravity is exactly offset by the deceleration due to atmospheric drag.

Meteor fragmentation isn't always spectacular and explosive. Sometimes it just falls apart.

 

American Meteor Society.

Then where is the rest, read Explosion and/or debris.

 

Considering his height and the direction of the meteorite, I smell attention whoring.

Then where is the rest, read Explosion and/or debris.

 

Elsewhere, not observed. If the fragmentation occurred at a high altitude, even small divergences in velocity and trajectory of the pieces would mean that they'd be miles apart at low altitude.

 

Here are some photos of meteorites. Are they too small to have made it through the atmosphere intact?

http://meteorites.pdx.edu/meteoriteid.htm

mastercoms, on 04 Apr 2014 - 19:31, said:mastercoms, on 04 Apr 2014 - 19:31, said:

Pics or it didn't happen

 

Would a video, even slowed down, be enough?  ;)

 

But seems like it's a pretty common occurrence, " smaller strikes happen five to 10 times a year": http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/how-common-are-meteorite-strikes-1.1317681

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/11/27/florida-boy-7-struck-by-meteorite-while-playing-in-driveway-father-claims/

 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/17/it-came-from-the-sky-the-meteorite-that-mangled-the-malibu-vertical-dek-when-marie-kanpp-s-teenage-daughter-told-her-i-think-a-meteorite-hit-my-car-she-was-telling-the-truth-michael-daly-reports.html

 

http://meteorites.pdx.edu/meteoriteid.htm

 

I would think if the video was fake then NASA would have chimed in by now

Elsewhere, not observed. If the fragmentation occurred at a high altitude, even small divergences in velocity and trajectory of the pieces would mean that they'd be miles apart at low altitude.

 

Here are some photos of meteorites. Are they too small to have made it through the atmosphere intact?

http://meteorites.pdx.edu/meteoriteid.htm

Not claiming its impossible for rocks to come tumbling down at terminal velocity. But it is far from the norm.

And your examples, pretty much all of them seem scorched and are most likely a lot smaller then before entering the atmosphere.

 

The rock in the video seems like a moon rock. Or an asteroid in space. Hardly like a chuck of an exploded meteorite. But like one that gently rolled into our atmosphere. without suffering an explosion or any burning upon entry.

 

But I'm not an expert.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!