Recommended Posts

A skydiver in Norway captured incredible video of an extinguished meteorite shooting past him soon after he deployed his parachute, something that has never been seen before, let alone been recorded.

?This is the first time in history that a meteorite has been filmed in the air after its light goes out,? geologist Hans Amundsen told the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, Norway?s largest media organization also know as NRK.

Skydiver Anders Helstrup was lucky. The rock very nearly hit him, it passed so close.

 

?If you?d jumped a fraction of a second later, you?d be dead,? Amundsen told Helstrup in NRK?s report above. ?It would have cut him in half. Imagine a 5-kilo [11-pound] rock hitting you in the chest at 300 kilometers [186 miles] per hour. That would have led to quite an accident investigation.?

 

more

If it was really a meteorite it would have been going alot faster and one of that size would have burnt up in the atmosphere before it even gets as low as that. the image of it just looks like gravel which could have fell from the inside of the plane from when they jumped out.

 

Or they wanted to create some interest and someone threw a few stones out as to generate some media.

  • Like 1

Imagine if it had hit him, I doubt anyone would have thought "meteor" and we'd have a huge conspiracy on our hands.


If it was really a meteorite it would have been going alot faster and one of that size would have burnt up in the atmosphere before it even gets as low as that. the image of it just looks like gravel which could have fell from the inside of the plane from when they jumped out.

 

Or they wanted to create some interest and someone threw a few stones out as to generate some media.

 

It says in the article they think it's part of a larger meteor that exploded in the atmosphere and was low enough to stop glowing.

If it was really a meteorite it would have been going alot faster and one of that size would have burnt up in the atmosphere before it even gets as low as that. the image of it just looks like gravel which could have fell from the inside of the plane from when they jumped out.

 

Or they wanted to create some interest and someone threw a few stones out as to generate some media.

 

The rock wouldn't be going any faster than it's terminal velocity without other forces working on it. so no it woudn't really, remember the skydiver is also still falling fast at this point. 

  • Like 2

I bet this is debris that fell off the plane he just jumped out of

He's in a wing suit. Most likely they've been doing a lot of free fall since jumping and the plane is nowhere near them.

Also not sure what debris would drop from a plane, that size and shape.

To slow i doubt its meteorite :iiam:

 

This is in the lower and denser atmosphere. The rock has had plenty of time to decelerate to its terminal velocity. For perspective, a typical bowling ball has a terminal velocity of less than 200 MPH.

To me, it looked like a little stone swept up when repacking the parachute?

 

Deploy parachute, stone falls out of canopy.

You'd have to be blind and dumb to pack a stone the size of two fists and know know it, it would also have been a lot slower than this then.

You'd have to be blind and dumb to pack a stone the size of two fists and know know it, it would also have been a lot slower than this then.

 

Yeah, just watched it a second time but full screen and watched the slower parts too.

 

I therefore retract my statement haha.

A meteorite that size would've burned when it entered our atmosphere. And if it blew up then where's the explosion and/or other debris.

 

Whatever it is, if it was a meteorite and falling like that. I doubt the rest would've burned up, go find the rock(s)! :) They roughly know where it is, I'd be interested in a meteor slowing down to terminal velocity before it's even near the ground.

A meteorite that size would've burned when it entered our atmosphere. And if it blew up then where's the explosion and/or other debris.

Whatever it is, if it was a meteorite and falling like that. I doubt the rest would've burned up, go find the rock(s)! :) They roughly know where it is, I'd be interested in a meteor slowing down to terminal velocity before it's even near the ground.

It wasn't that size when it entered now was it, it's a fragment of a bigger meteorite. And they generally slow to terminal in the upper atmosphere...

A meteorite that size would've burned when it entered our atmosphere. And if it blew up then where's the explosion and/or other debris.

 

Whatever it is, if it was a meteorite and falling like that. I doubt the rest would've burned up, go find the rock(s)! :) They roughly know where it is, I'd be interested in a meteor slowing down to terminal velocity before it's even near the ground.

 

Meteor fragmentation isn't always spectacular and explosive. Sometimes it just falls apart.

 

American Meteor Society.

Due to atmospheric drag, most meteorites, ranging from a few kilograms up to about 8 tons (7,000 kg), will lose all of their cosmic velocity while still several miles up. At that point, called the retardation point, the meteorite begins to accelerate again, under the influence of the Earth?s gravity, at the familiar 9.8 meters per second squared. The meteorite then quickly reaches its terminal velocity of 200 to 400 miles per hour (90 to 180 meters per second). The terminal velocity occurs at the point where the acceleration due to gravity is exactly offset by the deceleration due to atmospheric drag.

Meteor fragmentation isn't always spectacular and explosive. Sometimes it just falls apart.

 

American Meteor Society.

Then where is the rest, read Explosion and/or debris.

 

Considering his height and the direction of the meteorite, I smell attention whoring.

Then where is the rest, read Explosion and/or debris.

 

Elsewhere, not observed. If the fragmentation occurred at a high altitude, even small divergences in velocity and trajectory of the pieces would mean that they'd be miles apart at low altitude.

 

Here are some photos of meteorites. Are they too small to have made it through the atmosphere intact?

http://meteorites.pdx.edu/meteoriteid.htm

mastercoms, on 04 Apr 2014 - 19:31, said:mastercoms, on 04 Apr 2014 - 19:31, said:

Pics or it didn't happen

 

Would a video, even slowed down, be enough?  ;)

 

But seems like it's a pretty common occurrence, " smaller strikes happen five to 10 times a year": http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/how-common-are-meteorite-strikes-1.1317681

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/11/27/florida-boy-7-struck-by-meteorite-while-playing-in-driveway-father-claims/

 

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/17/it-came-from-the-sky-the-meteorite-that-mangled-the-malibu-vertical-dek-when-marie-kanpp-s-teenage-daughter-told-her-i-think-a-meteorite-hit-my-car-she-was-telling-the-truth-michael-daly-reports.html

 

http://meteorites.pdx.edu/meteoriteid.htm

 

I would think if the video was fake then NASA would have chimed in by now

Elsewhere, not observed. If the fragmentation occurred at a high altitude, even small divergences in velocity and trajectory of the pieces would mean that they'd be miles apart at low altitude.

 

Here are some photos of meteorites. Are they too small to have made it through the atmosphere intact?

http://meteorites.pdx.edu/meteoriteid.htm

Not claiming its impossible for rocks to come tumbling down at terminal velocity. But it is far from the norm.

And your examples, pretty much all of them seem scorched and are most likely a lot smaller then before entering the atmosphere.

 

The rock in the video seems like a moon rock. Or an asteroid in space. Hardly like a chuck of an exploded meteorite. But like one that gently rolled into our atmosphere. without suffering an explosion or any burning upon entry.

 

But I'm not an expert.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!