Recommended Posts

Not always. If the .exe file is a new / unknown one, quite a few users can get infected until information about the file is sent by SS to Microsoft, gets analysed there, definitions are created, and those are propagated to the users. To make things worse, if the users for some reason do not have SS running or have blocked it from reporting unknown .exe files to Microsoft, it could be even harder to create a knowledge base for those files.

Right, but Windows 8 is still very much supported. XP - isn't.

even though Microsoft no longer supports it i do not have a problem with people still using Windows XP, its still a very nice OS however, being that the x64 version never picked up and has very low Driver support There arent any power machines that are running it. Also as of yesterday anyone that has a windows xp computer that requests support is going to be charged extra for support of a Legacy OS.

 

on a side note I have been offering to upgrade people to Windows 7 if their computers would support it and i try to urge them to do so. the license fee is not really that outrageous to do so.

XP is broken, and has been for quite a few years now. ;)

I should first add that I do not run XP on my main machine, but what is "broken" about it, asides from being outdated?  It's still well supported outside of Microsoft's ceased updates.

I would guess IE8 would be a much larger audience on XP to exploit. Which is why I think firefox would be safer.

 

Wouldn't Chrome or Opera be safer? 

Those are Zero day's In firefox which would also effect other versions of windows. I'm talking about  windows XP specific vulnerability which can be exploited via firefox.

 

You would need an exploit in any browser to exploit the OS. Why use the one that has the most known exploits? 

And...there were plenty of Windows 98 die hards when EOL happened. If they haven't upgraded by now, they probably still won't now

 

To this day i know a few enterprises that still have some 98SE, XP pro and 2000 pro boxes and a couple of NT and 2000 servers. They are all tight up and work well (completely stripped of useless crap and services) and the amount of money saved went into other urgent and more expensive projects. Those were the best conscious excuses I've seen for not migrating the OS, hardware and the applications / frameworks into a more modern and secure scenario; doesn't mean they are gonna be like that forever, but sometimes the necessary money for migrating the OS, the hardware, all the proprietary/open applications and the amount of testing, planning and evaluating new systems is enormous and cost ineffective (since it doesn't bring a direct form of revenue).

 

Having said that it puzzles me to see the opposite in some places; recently i went into a clinic (as a patient, not work related) and saw their rack, servers and the desktops... it amazes me how innocent some IT folks are when they leave something so import as data and in this case, patient data, in a rack near the entrance of the clinic were people like me can go there and fizzle with it.. so that clinic not only was running Windows XP on the desktops (with two AV solutions, for extra security lol) but windows 2000 server for holding patient data; it was easy to see some stuff in few minutes (some databases were in a shared folder and they contained very sensitive information) but the server was directly connected to the Internet without a firewall (directly connected to the router, relying on the router's NAT and firewall). i talked with my doctor about that and he said that they didn't had an IT for like 10 years or so, so they were basically free cruising.. :o

I should first add that I do not run XP on my main machine, but what is "broken" about it, asides from being outdated? It's still well supported outside of Microsoft's ceased updates.

For starters, security is HORRIBLE. Don't get me started on technical capabilities with newer hardware.

i hate to compare computers to cars, but there are always people that refuse to buy a new car b/c their 12yr old car "works just fine"

 

you know youre probably driving a ticking time bomb, but it works just fine right now so who cares to upgrade?

 

Not at all the same.  Not even close.  So far away from being comparable.

  • Like 1

For starters, security is HORRIBLE. Don't get me started on technical capabilities with newer hardware.

 

Well, nobody was discussing installing XP on new hardware.  I figured this was more-or-less about old machines which already have XP and people refusing to upgrade.

Please describe to me how security is HORRIBLE.

Well, nobody was discussing installing XP on new hardware.  I figured this was more-or-less about old machines which already have XP and people refusing to upgrade.

Please describe to me how security is HORRIBLE.

I don't believe I need to list how horrible XP's security is. We've had 13 years of first hand experience with that.

For starters, security is HORRIBLE. Don't get me started on technical capabilities with newer hardware.

 

Yes, because everyone needs an i3 and 8GB of ram to do email, facebook and write a document.

You do know a lot of XP machines also sold with SATA right?

WIth the Intel 865PE and 875P chipsets - these are P4 chipsets from the days of (don't faint) Socket 478 and AGP graphics.

THe ICH5R southbridge (optional with these two chipsets) supported SATA and RAID - it was, in fact, the only Intel southbridge that supported either natively in XP sans service packs

The 875P was actually more of a workstation chipset (especially with ICH5R); and the motherboard I had bought with it was far from cheap - ASUS' P4C800-E Deluxe.

In addition to Intel SATA and/or RAID as options, the E Deluxe also had onboard Intel gigabit Ethernet - specifically, the Intel PRO1000CT (via the Communications Streaming Architecture - CSA).  (Not exactly cheap networking.)

But then, how many motherboards of that era (outside of workstation and enterprise buys) were that feature-packed, even, if not especially, in 2004/2005 (the era of Windows XP Service Pack 2, and the rewrite of Longhorn that eventually begat Vista)?  Have we forgotten the Dell Dimension 2400?  Dell sold a LOT of Dimenstion 2400s - mostly with either original Northwoods or the Northwood-C derived early Celeron CPUs; worse, most of these came with both awful onboard Intel graphics and NO option for replacement except PCI?  (It was likely these same Dell Dimensions that first damaged the reputation of Intel, and later Microsoft, with regards to Vista, before eventually nearly wrecking the reputation of Dell itself.)  I am STILL seeing these Dimension 2400s coming through - remember, I mentioned a ton of sales to business and government - refurbished and used as second-and-third-tier home PCs, and mostly still running XP.  (I have two by my right elbow right now - one waiting to be picked up by the owner, and another that is waiting for me to find a new purpose for it; I can assure you, it won't be running XP.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!