Recommended Posts

Not always. If the .exe file is a new / unknown one, quite a few users can get infected until information about the file is sent by SS to Microsoft, gets analysed there, definitions are created, and those are propagated to the users. To make things worse, if the users for some reason do not have SS running or have blocked it from reporting unknown .exe files to Microsoft, it could be even harder to create a knowledge base for those files.

Right, but Windows 8 is still very much supported. XP - isn't.

even though Microsoft no longer supports it i do not have a problem with people still using Windows XP, its still a very nice OS however, being that the x64 version never picked up and has very low Driver support There arent any power machines that are running it. Also as of yesterday anyone that has a windows xp computer that requests support is going to be charged extra for support of a Legacy OS.

 

on a side note I have been offering to upgrade people to Windows 7 if their computers would support it and i try to urge them to do so. the license fee is not really that outrageous to do so.

XP is broken, and has been for quite a few years now. ;)

I should first add that I do not run XP on my main machine, but what is "broken" about it, asides from being outdated?  It's still well supported outside of Microsoft's ceased updates.

I would guess IE8 would be a much larger audience on XP to exploit. Which is why I think firefox would be safer.

 

Wouldn't Chrome or Opera be safer? 

Those are Zero day's In firefox which would also effect other versions of windows. I'm talking about  windows XP specific vulnerability which can be exploited via firefox.

 

You would need an exploit in any browser to exploit the OS. Why use the one that has the most known exploits? 

And...there were plenty of Windows 98 die hards when EOL happened. If they haven't upgraded by now, they probably still won't now

 

To this day i know a few enterprises that still have some 98SE, XP pro and 2000 pro boxes and a couple of NT and 2000 servers. They are all tight up and work well (completely stripped of useless crap and services) and the amount of money saved went into other urgent and more expensive projects. Those were the best conscious excuses I've seen for not migrating the OS, hardware and the applications / frameworks into a more modern and secure scenario; doesn't mean they are gonna be like that forever, but sometimes the necessary money for migrating the OS, the hardware, all the proprietary/open applications and the amount of testing, planning and evaluating new systems is enormous and cost ineffective (since it doesn't bring a direct form of revenue).

 

Having said that it puzzles me to see the opposite in some places; recently i went into a clinic (as a patient, not work related) and saw their rack, servers and the desktops... it amazes me how innocent some IT folks are when they leave something so import as data and in this case, patient data, in a rack near the entrance of the clinic were people like me can go there and fizzle with it.. so that clinic not only was running Windows XP on the desktops (with two AV solutions, for extra security lol) but windows 2000 server for holding patient data; it was easy to see some stuff in few minutes (some databases were in a shared folder and they contained very sensitive information) but the server was directly connected to the Internet without a firewall (directly connected to the router, relying on the router's NAT and firewall). i talked with my doctor about that and he said that they didn't had an IT for like 10 years or so, so they were basically free cruising.. :o

I should first add that I do not run XP on my main machine, but what is "broken" about it, asides from being outdated? It's still well supported outside of Microsoft's ceased updates.

For starters, security is HORRIBLE. Don't get me started on technical capabilities with newer hardware.

i hate to compare computers to cars, but there are always people that refuse to buy a new car b/c their 12yr old car "works just fine"

 

you know youre probably driving a ticking time bomb, but it works just fine right now so who cares to upgrade?

 

Not at all the same.  Not even close.  So far away from being comparable.

  • Like 1

For starters, security is HORRIBLE. Don't get me started on technical capabilities with newer hardware.

 

Well, nobody was discussing installing XP on new hardware.  I figured this was more-or-less about old machines which already have XP and people refusing to upgrade.

Please describe to me how security is HORRIBLE.

Well, nobody was discussing installing XP on new hardware.  I figured this was more-or-less about old machines which already have XP and people refusing to upgrade.

Please describe to me how security is HORRIBLE.

I don't believe I need to list how horrible XP's security is. We've had 13 years of first hand experience with that.

For starters, security is HORRIBLE. Don't get me started on technical capabilities with newer hardware.

 

Yes, because everyone needs an i3 and 8GB of ram to do email, facebook and write a document.

You do know a lot of XP machines also sold with SATA right?

WIth the Intel 865PE and 875P chipsets - these are P4 chipsets from the days of (don't faint) Socket 478 and AGP graphics.

THe ICH5R southbridge (optional with these two chipsets) supported SATA and RAID - it was, in fact, the only Intel southbridge that supported either natively in XP sans service packs

The 875P was actually more of a workstation chipset (especially with ICH5R); and the motherboard I had bought with it was far from cheap - ASUS' P4C800-E Deluxe.

In addition to Intel SATA and/or RAID as options, the E Deluxe also had onboard Intel gigabit Ethernet - specifically, the Intel PRO1000CT (via the Communications Streaming Architecture - CSA).  (Not exactly cheap networking.)

But then, how many motherboards of that era (outside of workstation and enterprise buys) were that feature-packed, even, if not especially, in 2004/2005 (the era of Windows XP Service Pack 2, and the rewrite of Longhorn that eventually begat Vista)?  Have we forgotten the Dell Dimension 2400?  Dell sold a LOT of Dimenstion 2400s - mostly with either original Northwoods or the Northwood-C derived early Celeron CPUs; worse, most of these came with both awful onboard Intel graphics and NO option for replacement except PCI?  (It was likely these same Dell Dimensions that first damaged the reputation of Intel, and later Microsoft, with regards to Vista, before eventually nearly wrecking the reputation of Dell itself.)  I am STILL seeing these Dimension 2400s coming through - remember, I mentioned a ton of sales to business and government - refurbished and used as second-and-third-tier home PCs, and mostly still running XP.  (I have two by my right elbow right now - one waiting to be picked up by the owner, and another that is waiting for me to find a new purpose for it; I can assure you, it won't be running XP.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!