Texting Driver Who Slammed Cyclist: I, Like, 'Just Don't Care'


Recommended Posts

*facepalm*

You put someone in the hospital, and all you care about is the dent in your car! what kind of person are you!

*sigh*

Texting Driver Who Slammed Cyclist: I, Like, 'Just Don't Care'
 
Poor Kimberley Davis.
 
The 21-year-old Australian woman was livid when she slammed into a bicyclist while texting late last year, putting dents in her car. The victim suffered a spinal fracture and would spend the next three months in a hospital, but Davis wasn't having any of it, The Standard reports.
 
"I just don?t care because I?ve already been through a lot of ######## and my car is, like, pretty expensive and now I have to fix it," she told a responding officer two days after the Sept. 20 collision. "I?m kind of ###### off that the cyclist has hit the side of my car. I don?t agree that people texting and driving could hit a cyclist. I wasn?t on my phone when I hit the cyclist."
 
Davis, of Port Fairy, pleaded guilty on Monday to dangerous driving and was fined $4,500. Police say she used her phone behind the wheel 44 times before running down the cyclist. She called emergency responders but parked more than 300 feet away from the victim and refused to offer him help.
 
Davis couldn't contain her sadness after the loss of her license, and she made her woes known on Facebook:
 
(continued : http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/16/texting-driver-hits-bicyclist-i-dont-care_n_5158966.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular)

She then proceeded to a party, where she drove her friends around while under the influence of alcohol, because, in her words "I'm going to lose my licence anyway".

Suspended for 9 months.  What a joke.

Talk about sinking even lower.

 

I do not wish bad things to people, but I would honestly not mind if karma gets her.

 

She then proceeded to a party, where she drove her friends around while under the influence of alcohol, because, in her words "I'm going to lose my licence anyway".

Suspended for 9 months.  What a joke.

 

Bitch needs a serious slapping and a permanent ban from the roads.

 

Sure, cyclists are damned annoying and quite often ARE the cause of many accidents that then gets blamed on the driver, but as she was texting, she WAS on the phone, clearly distracted, and therefore clearly to blame.

 

What the hell was the judge thinking, being so lenient, especially given her dreadful attitude?

  • Like 8

Can she like...uhhh...get locked up 25 - life? And I thought the cyclists along with idiots texting in Priuses was bad here in Los Angeles. Bikes need to stay in their lanes, and text addicts need to park their asses out of the way because they tend to create more traffic anyways.

 

My sympathies to that gentleman and his wife, I hope this turd nugget gets eaten by dingos.

I can understand people not realising how dangerous using a mobile phone is while driving, as most of the time they'll probably be able to get away with it, but to show no remorse is absolutely unacceptable. She needs a serious jail sentence, as she is clearly a menace to society.

She then proceeded to a party, where she drove her friends around while under the influence of alcohol, because, in her words "I'm going to lose my licence anyway".

Suspended for 9 months.  What a joke.

 

on the way home from the party, wraps car round tree, all her friends die, she lives but just brushes it off and says "i broke a nail".

 

 

 

could happen, sounds like the type of person.

If you have that little regard for human life then you shouldn`t be on the roads.

What if she killed him?

Sorry but if the punishment does not change the attitude then the punishment either continues until such time it does or it should be a much more severe punishment.

Give her, her license and ban her from owning any electronic device capable of communication, no phone, no net, no gps or radio. FOR LIFE!!

Reminds me of a case that happened here in England. A drunk van driver knocked down and killed a cyclist, but didn't stop until later to check out the damage to his van. He then continued on. 

 

8 years imprisonment. What a joke.


If you have that little regard for human life then you shouldn`t be on the roads.

What if she killed him?

Sorry but if the punishment does not change the attitude then the punishment either continues until such time it does or it should be a much more severe punishment.

Give her, her license and ban her from owning any electronic device capable of communication, no phone, no net, no gps or radio. FOR LIFE!!

 

That wouldn't solve anything though would it. The problem is the use of technology whilst driving, not use of technology full stop. 

 

The problem is that she doesn't take her responsibilities as a driver seriously, so banning her from driving for a long time is the obvious appropriate punishment. 

Reminds me of a case that happened here in England. A drunk van driver knocked down and killed a cyclist, but didn't stop until later to check out the damage to his van. He then continued on. 

 

8 years imprisonment. What a joke.

 

That wouldn't solve anything though would it. The problem is the use of technology whilst driving, not use of technology full stop. 

 

The problem is that she doesn't take her responsibilities as a driver seriously, so banning her from driving for a long time is the obvious appropriate punishment. 

If she cant legally own a phone, then she cant use it while driving?

Not to mention remove a large part of the social bs she seem`s to value over a persons life.

Mind you I`d of done that on top of the driving ban.

If she cant legally own a phone, then she cant use it while driving?

Not to mention remove a large part of the social bs she seem`s to value over a persons life.

Mind you I`d of done that on top of the driving ban.

 

The phone isn't the problem though, it's the mentality that she doesn't have to concentrate on the road whilst driving. If she wasn't checking her phone she could be programming her radio, checking her makeup or generally being a menace in some other way. 

 

The fact that she deliberately drove whilst drunk just because she was going to lose her licence shows her child like mentality. She should be banned from driving for a very long time. The phone isn't the issue here, it's her lack of empathy / intelligence. 

  • Like 3

Before my post, I clearly want to say she should have gotten jail time. Obviously too dumb to be on the road.

The being said: Cyclists. I think the cops should really start to crack down on these guys. I mean, I have to yield to them in a roundabout yet they can go in any direction they want, lane split, etc....They are a danger to themselves. Recently, they have put bike lanes all around here which is a step in the right direction but that also removes a lane for regular drivers....and the idiots still use the regular lanes instead of their bike lanes when it is right next to them.

Personally I think cyclists should be reduced to pedestrians with the only exception of being able able to use all shoulders. Its safer for everyone. Also, obligated helmet everywhere and at all times.

I've always thought the following of cyclists and always will:

 

They should NOT be allowed to use the public highways with cars etc UNLESS they:

 

1.  Wear a helmet and other protective gear at all times.

2.  Carry insurance against accidents, just like all other users have to.

3.  Contribute towards the road taxes, just like all other users have to.

4.  Obey the laws of the road, just like all other users have to, and face THE SAME PUNISHMENTS.

 

If they don't want to do any of the above, then they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a road.

The phone isn't the problem though, it's the mentality that she doesn't have to concentrate on the road whilst driving. If she wasn't checking her phone she could be programming her radio, checking her makeup or generally being a menace in some other way. 

 

The fact that she deliberately drove whilst drunk just because she was going to lose her licence shows her child like mentality. She should be banned from driving for a very long time. The phone isn't the issue here, it's her lack of empathy / intelligence. 

Im not saying it isn`t, but I am saying that on top of any driving ban she should be banned from owning electronics. And part of that mentality is the social aspect of her life and how she needs to be constantly connected to it.

Her punishment should also include a punishment on her social life and standing, not just on the roads.

Yes the fact she nearly killed someone while in charge of a vehicle is the pressing matter, but the causation and mentality that she harbours need to be addressed also.

Simply banning her from driving isn`t enuff.

Mind you in saying that I truely believe that she,ll one day walk out in front of a bus due to her "social life" and phone attachment. (Darwin in action).

Suspended for 9 months.  What a joke.

 

A joke indeed. You hear so often about some moron who has committed pretty serious traffic offences getting the proverbial slap on the wrist.

 

Lawyers usually go into court and argue that the defendant losing their license would be too inconvenient for them... And it works!

I've always thought the following of cyclists and always will:

 

They should NOT be allowed to use the public highways with cars etc UNLESS they:

 

1.  Wear a helmet and other protective gear at all times.

2.  Carry insurance against accidents, just like all other users have to.

3.  Contribute towards the road taxes, just like all other users have to.

4.  Obey the laws of the road, just like all other users have to, and face THE SAME PUNISHMENTS.

 

If they don't want to do any of the above, then they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a road.

Your argument about road tax is invalid and only further highlights the mentality car users have against cyclists.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23694438

Tho I do agree, on points 1 and 4.

Most serious cyclists with expensive bikes already have them insured under home contents.

But I know what you mean with regards to liability insurance. And yes, I agree there also.

You should at least be on a registrar to say your allowed and competant on a public road with a bike.

Bit stupid to teach bike safety to primary school kids, who wont even need or use it until there in there late teens.

By which point half of its forgotten. Mind you I often think they should do some kind of 5-10yr reminder course for cyclists and drivers alike.

 

I've always thought the following of cyclists and always will:

 

They should NOT be allowed to use the public highways with cars etc UNLESS they:

 

1.  Wear a helmet and other protective gear at all times.

2.  Carry insurance against accidents, just like all other users have to.

3.  Contribute towards the road taxes, just like all other users have to.

4.  Obey the laws of the road, just like all other users have to, and face THE SAME PUNISHMENTS.

 

If they don't want to do any of the above, then they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a road.

 

Sounds reasonable. 

Im not saying it isn`t, but I am saying that on top of any driving ban she should be banned from owning electronics. And part of that mentality is the social aspect of her life and how she needs to be constantly connected to it.

Her punishment should also include a punishment on her social life and standing, not just on the roads.

Yes the fact she nearly killed someone while in charge of a vehicle is the pressing matter, but the causation and mentality that she harbours need to be addressed also.

Simply banning her from driving isn`t enuff.

Mind you in saying that I truely believe that she,ll one day walk out in front of a bus due to her "social life" and phone attachment. (Darwin in action).

 

I think that that would be targeting an irrelevant part of the offence.

 

It would be like banning somebody who assaults someone with a pool cue from playing pool. The problem is the assault - not the specific implement used. 

 

IF a pattern emerges and the person continues to carry out assaults using pool cues, or, in this case, continues to use her phone whilst driving, then I can see the logic in your proposition. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!