Texting Driver Who Slammed Cyclist: I, Like, 'Just Don't Care'


Recommended Posts

Your argument about road tax is invalid and only further highlights the mentality car users have against cyclists.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23694438

Tho I do agree, on points 1 and 4.

Most serious cyclists with expensive bikes already have them insured under home contents.

But I know what you mean with regards to liability insurance. And yes, I agree there also.

You should at least be on a registrar to say your allowed and competant on a public road with a bike.

Bit stupid to teach bike safety to primary school kids, who wont even need or use it until there in there late teens.

By which point half of its forgotten. Mind you I often think they should do some kind of 5-10yr reminder course for cyclists and drivers alike.

 

 

I'm aware of the arguments about what "road tax" is. Fine, call it a tax on the vehicle itself if you like, but the point still stands. Just like every other road user, they should be required to pay a tax on their vehicle. Why should they get off scot free with others don't?

 

Re the insurance, I don't mean insurance just for damage to their bikes, I mean the same levels of insurance car, truck and motorcyclists have to carry to cover damage to OTHER road users.  I'm sure you've seen just as many idiot cyclists flouting traffic lights etc and causing accidents, or scraping cars and so on and just getting away with it and leaving the poor driver with the bill. Equal rights, please.

 

And thanks for mentioning the competency point, I'd forgotten that. They should be required to take a road test as well, yes.

I'm aware of the arguments about what "road tax" is. Fine, call it a tax on the vehicle itself if you like, but the point still stands. Just like every other road user, they should be required to pay a tax on their vehicle. Why should they get off scot free with others don't?

 

Re the insurance, I don't mean insurance just for damage to their bikes, I mean the same levels of insurance car, truck and motorcyclists have to carry to cover damage to OTHER road users.  I'm sure you've seen just as many idiot cyclists flouting traffic lights etc and causing accidents, or scraping cars and so on and just getting away with it and leaving the poor driver with the bill. Equal rights, please.

 

And thanks for mentioning the competency point, I'd forgotten that. They should be required to take a road test as well, yes.

Yip. Agree also that you should pay a yearly sum and be on some type of registrar and pass competency tests every so often.

Tbh they need to make it a fairer ground for all road users and maybe then we won`t have these biases and much less accidents.

Tho thank whomever, but the UK is very safe already compared with some parts of the world.

And btw until my bike was stolen last week (true story, straight out the secure entranced main door and padlocked internal shed) I was and am a cyclist.

It`s also amazing how stupid and ill informed everyone seem`s to be regarding each others use of the road. Thus why im in favor of a level playing ground.

Maybe then the respect will actually be mutual instead of wishy washy add campaigns by safety groups and cycle paths that aren`t fit for purpose.

I think that that would be targeting an irrelevant part of the offence.

 

It would be like banning somebody who assaults someone with a pool cue from playing pool. The problem is the assault - not the specific implement used. 

 

IF a pattern emerges and the person continues to carry out assaults using pool cues, or, in this case, continues to use her phone whilst driving, then I can see the logic in your proposition. 

But your ruining my fun as a vicarious judge!!

She needs to suffer a little also :p

why does she need to care about the other person? her fault or not she can give a #### about who ever the #### she pleases

 

 

Not sure if trolling, but I'll answer anyway.

 

It speaks to her complete lack of empathy or remorse for her wrong doing. That is the sign on a psychopath.

 

And considering we factor in remorse and empathy for wrongdoing during sentencing, the perpetrator's attitude is relevant. 

I've always thought the following of cyclists and always will:

 

They should NOT be allowed to use the public highways with cars etc UNLESS they:

 

1.  Wear a helmet and other protective gear at all times.

2.  Carry insurance against accidents, just like all other users have to.

3.  Contribute towards the road taxes, just like all other users have to.

4.  Obey the laws of the road, just like all other users have to, and face THE SAME PUNISHMENTS.

 

If they don't want to do any of the above, then they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a road.

1: This should be 100% required. I mean, I have to wear my seatbelt always and motorcycles have to wear a helmet. Why cant cyclists wear a helmet?

2: This is a mixed situation. A lot of kids (less than 18) in the city ride on bikes (usually not on the roads) so you cant make them pay for insurance. And a bike cycle is technically not a vehicle registered.

3: Same as 2

4: Yes. Not only this but I would make ANYONE would wants to use their bike on a public road pass a minimal exam of BASIC road rules. I mean basic, such as 2 stupid questions like what is a STOP and what does the red light on a traffic light mean? So at least they know something. And this license would be also like the helmet: Must be with you at ALL times.

 

 

why does she need to care about the other person? her fault or not she can give a #### about who ever the #### she pleases

OK so then a family member of you gets shot, dies, and the police can give a #### about who ever the #### they please?

Your argument about road tax is invalid and only further highlights the mentality car users have against cyclists.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...gazine-23694438

The article does not apply worldwide. There are counties that pay a "car tax", a "road tax" and both.

Why is this woman not in prison for attempted murder?

 

If she is it better be a minimum of severable 20 years.

 

If she still has a driving licence! Why?

There is no evidence that she tried to kill the cyclist.

At best: Attempted manslaughter (that doesn't even exist because it isn't even possible)

I've always thought the following of cyclists and always will:

 

They should NOT be allowed to use the public highways with cars etc UNLESS they:

 

1.  Wear a helmet and other protective gear at all times.

2.  Carry insurance against accidents, just like all other users have to.

3.  Contribute towards the road taxes, just like all other users have to.

4.  Obey the laws of the road, just like all other users have to, and face THE SAME PUNISHMENTS.

 

If they don't want to do any of the above, then they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a road.

 

 

I agree with 1,2 and 4 completely but would point out that there is no such things as 'road tax' in the UK, its vehicle excise duty. Its an important distinction as Its a tax on the vehicle which is based on emissions in the UK. Many hybrid vehicles pay 0 road tax due to their low emissions and seeing as bikes are 0 emisions their tax would be 0. I am an infrequent cyclist but like many cyclists also drive a car. I pay ?200 a year in VED. It wouldn't work, at least in the UK. Elsewhere, maybe.

I've always thought the following of cyclists and always will:

 

They should NOT be allowed to use the public highways with cars etc UNLESS they:

 

1.  Wear a helmet and other protective gear at all times.

2.  Carry insurance against accidents, just like all other users have to.

3.  Contribute towards the road taxes, just like all other users have to.

4.  Obey the laws of the road, just like all other users have to, and face THE SAME PUNISHMENTS.

 

If they don't want to do any of the above, then they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a road.

 

Your more lenient than me then, I think cyclist should not share the road with large, heavy metallic objects which could easily run over them and only feel a slight bump.

I was out cycling yesterday and someone very nearly hit me while doing something on their phone. I was certainly glad i caught up with him at the lights so i could tell him exactly what i thought of him :angry:

 

And no i wasn`t polite and used some foul language, this girl looks (and sounds) such an airhead it probably wouldn`t have made any difference, because she`s just got to send that message straight away.

Using your phone while driving is dangerous.....don`t do it!

There is no evidence that she tried to kill the cyclist.

At best: Attempted manslaughter (that doesn't even exist because it isn't even possible)

Why are you defending this person.

 

Law is, ''you must not be in charge of a motor vehicle whilst under the influence of alcohol or not wearing a seat belt (unless a taxi driver in the U.K. might be same in Australia) or using a cell-phone''.

 

Once you stop abiding by these laws you put yourself in charge of a loaded gun with your finger on the trigger.

 

If you don't kill others/or yourself, you are in a position of mass murder.

Glad I live in a bike-friendly city :laugh:

 

Not that I don't understand the hate - especially in cities, a lot of cyclists are idiots, but some of us actually do obey traffic laws and wear helmets, and can respect the fact that we're riding next to things that could kill us and not miss a beat :P

 

Also, the girl in this story is an idiot.

Sounds like when a friend of mine was hit by a teen that was texting she said it was"very" important so it was worth the risk. Turns out she was talking about what color to buy a shirt.

Bitch needs a serious slapping and a permanent ban from the roads.

 

Sure, cyclists are damned annoying and quite often ARE the cause of many accidents that then gets blamed on the driver, but as she was texting, she WAS on the phone, clearly distracted, and therefore clearly to blame.

 

What the hell was the judge thinking, being so lenient, especially given her dreadful attitude?

While I 100% agree  with this statement. Perhaps she cleaned up her "act" in court and the Judge doesn't read Huffington Post? If the copper put the statement in his report though... sigh. :(

The police down under don't really seem to try hard to deter mobile use while in cars. Added to the general apathy of the younger australians these days, and it's a recipe for disaster

Why are you defending this person.

 

 

 

 

He isn't. He is saying she can't be charged with murder because murder has to be premeditated or intentional. The driver would have had to see the cyclist and decide to run her down for there to be a charge of attempted murder.

 

Not a law expert, but if the cyclist was killed, I think the driver would be charged with criminally negligent manslaughter.

  • Like 1

Why are you defending this person.

 

Law is, ''you must not be in charge of a motor vehicle whilst under the influence of alcohol or not wearing a seat belt (unless a taxi driver in the U.K. might be same in Australia) or using a cell-phone''.

 

Once you stop abiding by these laws you put yourself in charge of a loaded gun with your finger on the trigger.

 

If you don't kill others/or yourself, you are in a position of mass murder.

Im stating the facts: There is no evidence that this person tried to murder another person using her car.

You can spin it all you want but this is not murder. Just like a child playing with loaded gun, touches the trigger, and the bullet hits another random person with the child knowing or seeing that other person.

That is not murder. Its called manslaughter.

  • Like 1

I'm aware of the arguments about what "road tax" is. Fine, call it a tax on the vehicle itself if you like, but the point still stands. Just like every other road user, they should be required to pay a tax on their vehicle. Why should they get off scot free with others don't?

Nonsense. You don't have to pay tax to walk along the pavement and that's little different to cycling along the road. Cycling is environmentally friendly and produces negligible wear on the roads. It should be actively encouraged, not taxed. If a cyclist breaks the law they should face the consequences and police already have the power to do so but I fundamentally reject the idea of taxing cyclists.

 

Re the insurance, I don't mean insurance just for damage to their bikes, I mean the same levels of insurance car, truck and motorcyclists have to carry to cover damage to OTHER road users.  I'm sure you've seen just as many idiot cyclists flouting traffic lights etc and causing accidents, or scraping cars and so on and just getting away with it and leaving the poor driver with the bill. Equal rights, please.

What about pedestrians? When they cross the road they can cause an accident so should they all have to carry insurance too? Common sense, please.

Her car should of been destroyed and her phone destroyed along with it. 
Better yet, the car (if expensive, as she says) should of been forfeited by her and given to the guy on the bike so he can sell it for his legal expenses. 
Although something tells me it was just a crappy Holden Barina Spark or something lol.

I can understand people not realising how dangerous using a mobile phone is while driving, as most of the time they'll probably be able to get away with it, but to show no remorse is absolutely unacceptable. She needs a serious jail sentence, as she is clearly a menace to society.

 

Perfectly stated!

 

I can't believe she actually said that! Isn't texting and driving illegal there?

Perfectly stated!

 

I can't believe she actually said that! Isn't texting and driving illegal there?

 

Absolutely it is.

In QLD it is one of the more expensive fines and carries 3 demerit points (out of 12).

I understand Victoria, where this occurred, is even stricter in their road laws and fines.

I hope karma gets her back.

 

Maybe a truck will write-off her car, putting her in Hospital for 3 months with a fractured spine and she gets to watch the interview with the driver saying "I just done care, bitch dented my truck! Thats expensive, gotta pay for it now"

He isn't. He is saying she can't be charged with murder because murder has to be premeditated or intentional. The driver would have had to see the cyclist and decide to run her down for there to be a charge of attempted murder.

 

Not a law expert, but if the cyclist was killed, I think the driver would be charged with criminally negligent manslaughter.

I wrote attempted murder.

 

Using your cell-phone whilst driving is premeditated, I.M.H.O.

 

The Police in my area also pay no attention to people not wearing seatbelts, using their cell phones and for example a woman with her elbows on steering whilst putting mascara on eye lashes in West Malling High Street.

 

The were in the other lane, looked at her and looked forward and did nothing.

 

I see everyday, out of approx 100 drivers 30 using their cell-phones and 12 or so without a seat belt.

 

I am sure some are drunk from the night before still as they don't indicate and don't seem to be in full control of their motor vehicle.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!