Man 'Panhandles' for Employees on Street Corner

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

Lance Forsee was having trouble finding employees for his Central Washington landscaping company so he decided to think outside the box.

Forsee, who runs Colonial Lawn and Garden in Yakima, said traditional recruitment methods had failed. He's in peak season now and needs quality employees.

"In our community there's been several panhandlers working the area for quite some time with their cardboard signs - you know the typical 'will work for food, a dollar, everything helps,' he said in a Thursday interview with ABC News. "So we thought 'hmm, why don't we play off that?"

Forsee, 53, decided to break out his own cardboard sign.

"Desperate business owner will give $ and benefits to outstanding workers!" his message read. "Every employee helps. God bless!"

While some people were "conditioned" to stare right past his sign and so missed the message, many others read and appreciated it.

"Several people would pull over. Some would have resumes in hand," he said.

Standing at a busy intersection - the corner of 40th and Summitview avenues - he displayed his sign three times. On his third outing on Wednesday, KIMA-TV featured a story about his efforts. The response was startling.

"We're overwhelmed now with applicants," Forsee said. "We're swamped. I mean people are coming in. We've got hundreds, probably more than 200, since 11 o'clock (Wednesday)."

 

The starting salary for someone without experience is $10 an hour, Forsee said. That's higher than the state minimum of $9.32, and far above the federal minimum of $7.25.

Forsee said the hourly pay goes up to at least $12 for someone with experience. The average $12 per hour worker who'd been employed for a year or more received more than $5.50 per hour in benefits, including health insurance, paid holidays and paid vacation, Forsee said.

 

HT-lance-Forsee-ml-140516-16x9-608-jpg_1

more

  • Lighthalzen
  • Like 1
Mentor

SierraSonic

Posted
Posted

and McDonald's employees want $15/hours

Fast food workers want the minimum wage to be realigned with the proper value of the cost of living, They are asking the proper amounts in certain states, just not all of them, we need to bring the minimum wage up to proper federal value, then let each state set it to their state cost of living.

 

I'm betting that none that applied are from McDonald's.

I don't understand the point of your comment? Isn't that what you are against, people staying at mcdonalds? How can you look at people like they are such trash? There was most definitely were people who currently are working at fast food places who applied. I know a lot of people use fast food as a stopgap to employment and I know many get stuck in these positions until they can find better work, but your comments about it are getting sickening. Way to belittle people who are working for a living, no matter what the job. You act as if fast food workers are all morons who have no drive. Get a clue.

 

 

As for the article, great on the guy for going about finding a solution to his employee problem, I wish more companies would try to reach out to the people who may not have had success with traditional means of looking for work.

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fast food workers want the minimum wage to be realigned with the proper value of the cost of living.

 

I don't understand the point of your comment? Isn't that what you are against, people staying at mcdonalds? How can you look at people like they are such trash? There was most definitely were people who currently are working at fast food places who applied. I know a lot of people use fast food as a stopgap to employment and I know many get stuck in these positions until they can find better work, but your comments about it are getting sickening. Way to belittle people who are working for a living, no matter what the job. You act as if fast food workers are all morons who have no drive. Get a clue.

I was thinking of the local McDee employees that I know.

Most of them just want a paycheck and would never think of getting their hands dirty, doing landscaping.

And many grumbling min. Wage workers wrongly expect to support entire families on their pay.

They need to wake up.

Mentor

SierraSonic

Posted
Posted

I was thinking of the local McDee employees that I know.

Most of them just want a paycheck and would never think of getting their hands dirty, doing landscaping.

And many grumbling min. Wage workers wrongly expect to support entire families on their pay.

They need to wake up.

The problem with that is that minimum wage was designed in mind for a single parent of 2. If we set the bar as so low as to barely support a single adult living on their own, there is no room for error or bad luck in a persons life. There needs to be a cushion for all people who have to work for a living, no matter what the job, and they should be rewarded with a pay with what the cost of living should be.

 

If they aren't supporting children, imagine supporting their parents during their retirement if their retirement plan fails.

 

http://www.epi.org/publication/wage-workers-older-88-percent-workers-benefit/

  • The average age of affected workers is 35 years old;
  • 88 percent of all affected workers are at least 20 years old;
  • 35.5 percent are at least 40 years old;
  • 56 percent are women;
  • 28 percent have children;
  • 55 percent work full-time (35 hours per week or more);
  • 44 percent have at least some college experience.

These numbers paint a picture of a majority of people on minimum wage as adults, struggling to keep up with payments to keep their children. A third of them are over 40, an age where learning a new field is extremely difficult, especially if you have a family to care for. A majority of which are women, who are unfairly treated with wages and are more prone to be taking care of dependants.

 

If you are on minimum wage, you should have every expectation to be able to support half of a marriage, the average being consummated with 2 1/2 children. So a single person should technically support 1 and 3/4 people, or about twice what they are making now.

 

The people you seem to be more concerned with are leeches, those with no drive for work, which is understandable, but we need to find a different way to go after the leeches, and trying to not harm individuals or families who need help.

 

We are not willing to let people prevent births due to people complaining, can't teach people to use proper safety due to people complaining, and yet we can't take care of them after a mistake happened, as people will complain. We can't even offer the easy way out, as people will complain. So what do we do? We aren't in a country that believes through the law of of darwinism, we try to help people who need it, at the cost of some of them abusing the system, but I could honestly care less as that is .0001% (insignificant to our economy) of the population. Abusers eventually get caught, and even if they don't, abusers aren't a good enough reason to screw over legitimate users.

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Minimum wage has always been to support that one, individual employee -- not a wife, three kids, your ailing mother.

You need two jobs, or better skills if you want to support families.

And I have all kinds of repect for those with the gumption to work.

But the general public is not going to pay ever increasing prices, to support worker's dependents.

Mentor

SierraSonic

Posted
Posted

Minimum wage has always been to support that one, individual employee -- not a wife, three kids, your ailing mother.

You need two jobs, or better skills if you want to support families.

And I have all kinds of repect for those with the gumption to work.

But the general public is not going to pay ever increasing prices, to support worker's dependents.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42973.pdf

 

http://www.epi.org/publication/bp357-federal-minimum-wage-increase/

ib354-figA.png.538

 

12 years since it was enacted, the minimum wage increased to reach our value, after that it hit a value of thats 20-30% more valuable than it is now and stayed that way for 30 years til the early 90s. From where it seems we haven't been able to recover the economy at all. Again, for the majority of it's life, it was more valuable than it is now, and it seems that only during times of hardships it was worth this little, such as the great depression, and the current recession thats "over".

 

So since the majority of it's life it supported families, I think you are in the wrong, and leaving it at levels where only one person is supported seems to cause issues in the economy. Such as the great depression before hand, and it's current value now.

 

This economy is based on people paying for products that support the cost of living of the employees at the establishment. Their benefits, and the products and services they offer. They are a total cost. The economy handled it before, why do you act like this is different from how it should work. Right now we are support profits over people, and I believe that's wrong. Other minimum wage people pay these establishment's too, I'm sure for them to get an increase in pay THEY are willing to pay more for that to happen, and their money is just as important as anybodies.

 

Prices would not have to double, to double minimum wage increases, if we go with $10.10, and then a slow gradual increase, the prices would go up 3-5% average.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By datacenter · Posted

      Will test it, thanks!
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By Steven P. · Posted

    • Laptop Processor Question

      By +Edouard · Posted

      Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Laptop Processor Question

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!