Recommended Posts

I knew they'd make a claim like this, they also claimed "The instant the graphical potential of a console generation has been reached, it should be ditched and a new gen started".

 

http://gamingbolt.com/crytek-8gb-ram-can-be-easily-filled-up-will-surely-be-limiting-factor-on-ps4xbox-one#rPKkxlGXUwDD8Bz6.16

 

post-350302-0-13402600-1400457097.jpg

 

 

CRYENGINE Online Marketing Manager, who goes by the nick of Com_Raven on NeoGAF, decided to clarify the statement made by Sean Tracy.

 

 

Link

 

//edit: For the lazy

I know that some people (some of which I think might have never played any of our games^^) love to go ?lol Crytek, they can only do graphics demos?- but the person quoted here is Sean Tracy, whose title is ? as indicated in the interview ? ?US Engine Business Development Manager?. So he actually works far more with our licensees like Turtle Rock or Cloud Imperium than on our own internal games : )

Also, as a tech company for whom the engine is an important part of the business, we are obviously also always looking at the future, and not just the here and now- remember that we are just coming off of an 8 year console cycle. I think it would be fair to say that in the next 8 years, you will see games that would benefit from having more than 8GB of RAM (and as many pointed out already, not all of that is accessible to game devs either way).

I understand that console wars are important business ; ) , but rather than just see it as ?Crytek criticises my console, their games suck?- take a moment to consider it from the view of a company that has to constantly ask itself ?what might engine technology look like in 5 years?. Not jsut for our games, but also for the games that the people we want to license our engine to might want to develop (see Star Citizen as a good example)

Does this mean they can focus on making quality games again now? 

The Wii U has 2gb of ram and Mario Kart 8 is the prettiest game I have seen in quite a while. 

My PC has 16gb and over half of it is never used in gaming. I agree the 8gb will hold back developers, but who cares, you want good graphics then play pc. The much bigger problem to be addressed regarding the new consoles is lack of quality games.

There is nothing to even tempt me to get a xbone or ps4 right now.  

The only thing that's limiting Crytek is their ability to write a good story.

 

and to optimize their code. which is what other developers spend rather a large amount of time doing but for some reason Crytek has never gotten around to doing it for anything they release. which is a reason that most of their games do not run very well even on very high end systems. 

More lazy developers complaining about resources..how surprising. Reminds me of the logistics department where i used to work. You gave them fifty trucks, and within six months half were "in maintenance" so they wanted fifty more.

 

i'm still amazed something like Last of Us runs on a device that theoretically has less memory than a two year old smartphone. This Sean dude really needs to shut his pie hole.

  • Like 2

Weren`t they the ones flapping there lips about having 8gb of ram in consoles this gen in the 1st place?

Oh wait they did!

http://www.gamerzines.com/playstation/news-ps3/crytek-next-gen-8gb-ram.html

 

 

Thanks for posting this, always nice to be reminded how annoying and two faced some people can get. How much RAM does this guy need? Let me guess, Crysis 3 really needed 64GB but it's only because of pleb untermench with 16GB that they couldn't realize their true vision for it...

 

Before they even say anything i'd like to know why with all their amazing expertise they couldn't get Ryse to run in more than 900p. Oh let me guess, cause it was a hastily upgraded Project Kingdoms for the 360 that they couldn't be arsed to properly re-do.

Thanks for posting this, always nice to be reminded how annoying and two faced some people can get. How much RAM does this guy need? Let me guess, Crysis 3 really needed 64GB but it's only because of pleb untermench with 16GB that they couldn't realize their true vision for it...

 

Before they even say anything i'd like to know why with all their amazing expertise they couldn't get Ryse to run in more than 900p. Oh let me guess, cause it was a hastily upgraded Project Kingdoms for the 360 that they couldn't be arsed to properly re-do.

 

If that was hastily upgraded, well then blimey, that's a damned impressive job that they did. Easily one of the two best looking launch titles (dare I say...the best?). 

and to optimize their code. which is what other developers spend rather a large amount of time doing but for some reason Crytek has never gotten around to doing it for anything they release. which is a reason that most of their games do not run very well even on very high end systems.

You joking me right?

Crytek engine is extremely well optimized.

Crysis 3 was gorgeous, well optimized, and had good story for an FPS

  • Like 2

If that was hastily upgraded, well then blimey, that's a damned impressive job that they did. Easily one of the two best looking launch titles (dare I say...the best?). 

 

Love Ryse, it was a very handsome game but by their own admission it's Project Kingdoms upgraded for X1. The credits even refer to it as Project Kingdoms and say that it's been seven years etc. It could easily have been higher res though if they put some more effort into it. This wasn't really dissing Ryse as it was dissing Crytek's often elitist approach.   

PS5 unveiled at E3, release in October for $449.

 

This Sean guy is proving to be Crytek's Adam Orth. Next he'll be telling us to deal with it when Crysis 4 requires 16GB of video RAM.

Love Ryse, it was a very handsome game but by their own admission it's Project Kingdoms upgraded for X1. The credits even refer to it as Project Kingdoms and say that it's been seven years etc. It could easily have been higher res though if they put some more effort into it. This wasn't really dissing Ryse as it was dissing Crytek's often elitist approach.   

 

They must've got a bit sloppy with their optimization then. I can imagine that once the dev teams found out that they were going to have ~7GB RAM vs. 512, and a massively more powerful processor/GPU, they went a bit silly with effects and then realized that hitting 1080p needed a ..bit of optimization. :P

  • Like 1

Why do people consider companies to consist of one persons opinion and thats the official opinion? Like the Cryek dude said, he doesn't hardly work with internal games and software more-so dealing with licensing to third-parties whom want to deliver with Crytek. If you walked round the offices and asked each individual developer/architect/artist you're going to get contrasting opinions from everyone around these things.

 

Of course RAM will be limiting in years to come, so will the GPUs and CPUs, technology grows. It happens.

Why do people consider companies to consist of one persons opinion and thats the official opinion? Like the Cryek dude said, he doesn't hardly work with internal games and software more-so dealing with licensing to third-parties whom want to deliver with Crytek. If you walked round the offices and asked each individual developer/architect/artist you're going to get contrasting opinions from everyone around these things.

 

Of course RAM will be limiting in years to come, so will the GPUs and CPUs, technology grows. It happens.

 

 

He is not the only one critize both consoles.   If these consoles are to last 10 years they are really inadequate. 

They must've got a bit sloppy with their optimization then. I can imagine that once the dev teams found out that they were going to have ~7GB RAM vs. 512, and a massively more powerful processor/GPU, they went a bit silly with effects and then realized that hitting 1080p needed a ..bit of optimization. :p

Let's have a look at some of the other games that don't run at 1080p on the XB1: Thief, Watch_Dogs, Titanfall, Battlefield 4, Call Of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Dead Rising 3, Metal Gear Solid V and Assassin's Creed 4. Are you saying all of those developers were sloppy too and went overboard on special effects? And why is it that the PC versions don't have performance issues too? Moving from 720p to 1080p requires a lot of extra horsepower, something which the XB1 obviously lacks (as does the PS4 to a lesser degree).

 

As for Crytek pushing for 8GB of RAM, they stated that should be the minimum and you've got to remember that both consoles assign a significant amount of that RAM to the system (around 3GB). Don't forget that Dell is shipping computers with 16GB of RAM and 2TB hard-drives, which compares to the 8GB RAM and 500GB storage of the XB1 and PS4 - they're already out of date, let alone seven years down the line.

 

I honestly don't see Sony and Microsoft sticking with fixed-spec consoles going into the future. Mobile phones and tablets are advancing at a rapid pace yet consoles are seriously outdated at launch and have to last seven years. It wouldn't surprise me to see them move to a business model similar to Steam Machines, so they can offer premium models (i.e. 4K models, larger storage, SSDs) and cheaper models (i.e. 720p, casual gaming). The money is being made on the software side anyway and both companies have moved away from the large subsidies that defined previous generations.

Why do people consider companies to consist of one persons opinion and thats the official opinion? Like the Cryek dude said, he doesn't hardly work with internal games and software more-so dealing with licensing to third-parties whom want to deliver with Crytek. If you walked round the offices and asked each individual developer/architect/artist you're going to get contrasting opinions from everyone around these things.

 

Of course RAM will be limiting in years to come, so will the GPUs and CPUs, technology grows. It happens.

 

He identified himself as a Crytek team member, so he speaks for the company.

 

 

Let's have a look at some of the other games that don't run at 1080p on the XB1: Thief, Watch_Dogs, Titanfall, Battlefield 4, Call Of Duty: Advanced Warfare, Dead Rising 3, Metal Gear Solid V and Assassin's Creed 4. Are you saying all of those developers were sloppy too and went overboard on special effects? And why is it that the PC versions don't have performance issues too? Moving from 720p to 1080p requires a lot of extra horsepower, something which the XB1 obviously lacks (as does the PS4 to a lesser degree).

 

As for Crytek pushing for 8GB of RAM, they stated that should be the minimum and you've got to remember that both consoles assign a significant amount of that RAM to the system (around 3GB). Don't forget that Dell is shipping computers with 16GB of RAM and 2TB hard-drives, which compares to the 8GB RAM and 500GB storage of the XB1 and PS4 - they're already out of date, let alone seven years down the line.

 

I honestly don't see Sony and Microsoft sticking with fixed-spec consoles going into the future. Mobile phones and tablets are advancing at a rapid pace yet consoles are seriously outdated at launch and have to last seven years. It wouldn't surprise me to see them move to a business model similar to Steam Machines, so they can offer premium models (i.e. 4K models, larger storage, SSDs) and cheaper models (i.e. 720p, casual gaming). The money is being made on the software side anyway and both companies have moved away from the large subsidies that defined previous generations.

 

 

What's your point? PCs can be built with 64GB RAM and now 6TB hard drives. They also cost a lot more than both consoles combined. For less than $1000 you cannot build a PC that can really be called master race. But console haters never acknowledge this point. Also, i really doubt MS and Sony plan on this generation lasting as long as the previous one.

 

I am getting sick and tired of the hypocrisy. Samsung or some other bunch launches a $700 device with 3GB of RAM and an eight-core processor that barely performs like a 10-year old PC, but everyone goes oh look, amazing! Sony and MS release very powerful machines for less than $500 and everyone calls them dated cause they're less powered than a $2500 PC. The idiocy never ceases.

 

He identified himself as a Crytek team member, so he speaks for the company.

 

 

 

 

What's your point? PCs can be built with 64GB RAM and now 6TB hard drives. They also cost a lot more than both consoles combined. For less than $1000 you cannot build a PC that can really be called master race. But console haters never acknowledge this point. Also, i really doubt MS and Sony plan on this generation lasting as long as the previous one.

 

I am getting sick and tired of the hypocrisy. Samsung or some other bunch launches a $700 device with 3GB of RAM and an eight-core processor that barely performs like a 10-year old PC, but everyone goes oh look, amazing! Sony and MS release very powerful machines for less than $500 and everyone calls them dated cause they're less powered than a $2500 PC. The idiocy never ceases.

 

 

Thats not really true  for $1000 bucks you really can buy PC that will kick both consoles butt right now.  The  PC are going to get much better in 5 years big leap between the consoles (whose specs do not change and a PC).   Also contrary to popular belief the gaming PC market is growing not shrinking.    Steam sales are very high.

No, for $1000 you'll get a PC that can do 1080p/60 in all games in high settings. That's hardly kicking their butt. Kicking their butt would be at least 1440p/60 with ultra settings. That's the baseline for master race creds. Everything else you say about PCs is true and self evident, but consoles are not meant to compete with that. Console specs stay static? Wow, what a revelation, i thought my X1 could upgrade itself...seriously dude, we know what the differences between a PC and a console are. That's why many of us have both categories if we can afford to. There's no need to hate.

 

And no one is saying the PC gaming market is shrinking, how is that even relevant? You're just a console hater, sorry to say.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!