Metering off the palm of your hand.

By Colin.B
in Digital Camera Lab

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

Colin.B

Posted
Posted

I didn't start getting the hang of armchair photography until I took a photography course at college. During the course I learned a lot of useful information and discovered that yes, like everything, the more I did it the better I got (within reason...I still wouldn't attempt to sell any of my prints ha ha!) One thing I've taken issue with however is the "metering off the palm of your hand" when you do not have a grey card. The instructor told us it is the next best thing. However, when I do meter off my hand, the image is almost over exposed. I'm holding my hand up, focusing and adjusting until the exposure value is 0. Am I doing it wrong?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1216121-metering-off-the-palm-of-your-hand/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

I think your teacher was using techniques that was required(or near so) during the age of analog photography and thinking they apply to digital.

Metering is practically useless on digital.aince the camera does it. The only real metering you might want to do is white card white balancing, but even this is unnecessary in most all situations and you can change the white balance at will if you shoot raw.

  • Draconian Guppy
  • Like 1
Proficient

Stealthy_Singh

Posted
Posted

I think your teacher was using techniques that was required(or near so) during the age of analog photography and thinking they apply to digital.

Metering is practically useless on digital.aince the camera does it. The only real metering you might want to do is white card white balancing, but even this is unnecessary in most all situations and you can change the white balance at will if you shoot raw.

 

Surely the in camera metering can be fooled?

Guest

Posted
Posted

Pretty sure that metering your hand is only useful in particular if you're shooting a portrait of someone with a similar skin tone to yourself. When doing so, you'd need to make sure your hand is in the same lighting as the subject too, which means you might as well just meter on them to start with.

 

Why not just use the built in light meter anyway? They're quite accurate these days and as long as you're in the right ballpark to start with, (assuming you're shooting raw with a decent camera) you can go either down or up a full stop in post if required.

 

I know, shooting right in camera is best, but if you're not a pro, this is fine imo.

 

As for white balance, you'll never get it spot on manually, a gray card can help drastically if you're going for colours as neutral and 'true' as possible.

Proficient

Stealthy_Singh

Posted
Posted

That's the beauty of digital, you see it right away and you can just take another picture.

While that is good. It's better to understand the photographic essentials so you don't have to keep checking. I'm definitely not at that point but that's the aim!

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

While that is good. It's better to understand the photographic essentials so you don't have to keep checking. I'm definitely not at that point but that's the aim!

 

 

Using lux meters for monitoring is  waste of time on digital. The built in metering does as good if not a better job, it also allows you to use area or pin point metering depending on the shot. 

 

So again, the only metering that makes sense to use is White balance. the disadvantage to that is that auto does a good enough job 90% of the time, 9.9% of the time you'll have perfect result manually correcting the white balance in post in Lightroom. 

 

it's only a a very few sub percentage of shots you need PERFECT white balance that require metering. say professional wedding shots. of course in the end the difference between a metered WB shot and a auto/manually corrected one, is so small it can't even be detected on the print. which makes all the extra work metering the WB require rather pointless. as you need to use the menu of the camera to take the metering shot, place the whiteboard and then apply it. and then if you're using natural light any change in shadow, sun position, clouds or anything will require you to redo all the work. 

  • Draconian Guppy
  • Like 1
Proficient

Stealthy_Singh

Posted
Posted

Using lux meters for monitoring is  waste of time on digital. The built in metering does as good if not a better job, it also allows you to use area or pin point metering depending on the shot. 

 

I don't mean using off camera meters. But I mean having an understanding of exposure and metering. Then you can either over or underexpose as you see fit using the meter reading in the view finder. While we can rely on our digital cameras for a lot they are but a tool and deeper understanding of the principles allows us to better utilise them for better photos. Since if done some reading on some very basic photography my shots have improved a hundred fold. Even with a basic point and shoot. Not to any kind of awesomeness but that they were that s$*t to begin with! 

Grand Master

Draconian Guppy

Posted
Posted

I don't mean using off camera meters. But I mean having an understanding of exposure and metering. Then you can either over or underexpose as you see fit using the meter reading in the view finder. While we can rely on our digital cameras for a lot they are but a tool and deeper understanding of the principles allows us to better utilise them for better photos. Since if done some reading on some very basic photography my shots have improved a hundred fold. Even with a basic point and shoot. Not to any kind of awesomeness but that they were that s$*t to begin with! 

Pics or it didn't happen :ninja:

Veteran

Colin.B

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for the replies. I figured it was fine to just let the camera do it, especially since I shoot in RAW+JPEG but when she said to meter I started to second guess myself. I've noticed if I'm off by 2 posts of exposure it's hard to correct in photoshop but one or so isn't picture wrecking by any means. It also didn't make sense because of what was mentioned earlier - skin tones, etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By monterxz · Posted

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen

      By ad47uk · Posted

      Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen

      By +TRS-80 · Posted

      Microsoft details new Edge for Business security features, including AI-powered scareware detection So Edge is adding a "scarecrow." Will it be animated?
    • This Dell 27 inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor is really cheap after a very long time

      By Malisk · Posted

      I have this one and it's great, also paired with a Mac. I like the white back aesthetics of it and ability to have all your wireless usb peripherals under a clean lid. 4K @ 120 Hz and 65W usb-c charging is not bad even at its typical price point. The U series is probably better for commercial photo work though; IIRC one reason this one is priced in a different bracket is because it's not calibrated and verified for optimal color accuracy. Not something I think of in daily use, coding, and light gaming though.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Snow Day Calculator Alert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      251
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!