Recommended Posts

If there?s one thing Apple?s Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) makes clear, it?s that Apple loves the programmers who make software for iOS and OS X. Partly, the love is from Apple?s long-standing corporate culture: The term ?software evangelist? originated at Apple, and the company spent decades trying to lure (and keep) programmers back when the Mac was a footnote with marketshare in the single digits.

 

But at the same time, Apple isn?t above pulling the rug out from under its own developers. Overnight, a company or lone programmer can go from having a leading app with rave reviews and decent sales to competing directly with Apple?and that almost never goes well.
 
os-x-yosemite-icloud-drive-625x625.jpg
 
In fact, it?s happened so often in Apple?s history that it even has a name: ?getting Sherlocked.?
 
So with OS X Yosemite and iOS 8 just announced at WWDC and heaps of new features unveiled, who?s getting Sherlocked this time?
 
Who?s getting Sherlocked by Apple now?
 
Now that Apple has announced key new features in OS X Yosemite and iOS 8, who?s getting Sherlocked this time around? The list is surprisingly long.
 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1216403-8-companies-apple-is-screwing-over/
Share on other sites

These companies began by offering something that Apple, and other didn't offer.  They took the risk where the big guys didn't.  It paid off, now the big guys are integrating things that people use.

It's not screwing over, it's providing more features.

So just because somebody comes up with some sort of idea, nobody can refine it and do something similar?  Yeah okay....

 

It's been pretty interesting to see all the petty complaining people do after these Apple presentations.  This article is one of the more pathetic ones.

Agreed. But it is pretty obvious in some cases they are of right copying. Of course everyone does. Guess it's OK as long as they are not infringing on anything and they make it better or a little different

 

That's just leading into the argument that software patents are dumb.  Cloud storage for example.  There aren't many ways to make it different to your competitor.  They are all the same thing, they take your data, and put it on a remote server.

 

In saying that.  It also leads me to question the EU.  MS is fined a lot of money for having a default browser, they need to provide Media playerless software etc.  But in the world of mobiles, the EU doesn't care.

A lot of these things exist outside of the Apple ecosystem anyway, my Android phone has the same time-lapse feature which they claim Apple is copying from Whatsapp, my Windows PC has built in cloud-storage sync stuff, etc.

I think the worst has to be the bit about Apply copying Skitch by adding annotations to Mail. Preview has done that for absolutely years, it's not new nor is Apple copying it from somebody else.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
    • Look who's back!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!