Recommended Posts

If there?s one thing Apple?s Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) makes clear, it?s that Apple loves the programmers who make software for iOS and OS X. Partly, the love is from Apple?s long-standing corporate culture: The term ?software evangelist? originated at Apple, and the company spent decades trying to lure (and keep) programmers back when the Mac was a footnote with marketshare in the single digits.

 

But at the same time, Apple isn?t above pulling the rug out from under its own developers. Overnight, a company or lone programmer can go from having a leading app with rave reviews and decent sales to competing directly with Apple?and that almost never goes well.
 
os-x-yosemite-icloud-drive-625x625.jpg
 
In fact, it?s happened so often in Apple?s history that it even has a name: ?getting Sherlocked.?
 
So with OS X Yosemite and iOS 8 just announced at WWDC and heaps of new features unveiled, who?s getting Sherlocked this time?
 
Who?s getting Sherlocked by Apple now?
 
Now that Apple has announced key new features in OS X Yosemite and iOS 8, who?s getting Sherlocked this time around? The list is surprisingly long.
 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1216403-8-companies-apple-is-screwing-over/
Share on other sites

These companies began by offering something that Apple, and other didn't offer.  They took the risk where the big guys didn't.  It paid off, now the big guys are integrating things that people use.

It's not screwing over, it's providing more features.

So just because somebody comes up with some sort of idea, nobody can refine it and do something similar?  Yeah okay....

 

It's been pretty interesting to see all the petty complaining people do after these Apple presentations.  This article is one of the more pathetic ones.

Agreed. But it is pretty obvious in some cases they are of right copying. Of course everyone does. Guess it's OK as long as they are not infringing on anything and they make it better or a little different

 

That's just leading into the argument that software patents are dumb.  Cloud storage for example.  There aren't many ways to make it different to your competitor.  They are all the same thing, they take your data, and put it on a remote server.

 

In saying that.  It also leads me to question the EU.  MS is fined a lot of money for having a default browser, they need to provide Media playerless software etc.  But in the world of mobiles, the EU doesn't care.

A lot of these things exist outside of the Apple ecosystem anyway, my Android phone has the same time-lapse feature which they claim Apple is copying from Whatsapp, my Windows PC has built in cloud-storage sync stuff, etc.

I think the worst has to be the bit about Apply copying Skitch by adding annotations to Mail. Preview has done that for absolutely years, it's not new nor is Apple copying it from somebody else.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!