Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)


Recommended Posts

Yeah, those were shot on the 'Suicide Squad' set and aren't for 'Batman v Superman' :)

 

So then we're going to get a batman cameo in the Suicide Squad movie, unless all they do is show the batmobile chase scene they just filmed.

lol yeah see this is how I really view this movie...I mean there is no way Batman can contend if you think realistic even in sifi terms.

 

Yeah, we get it - you don't read comics and have no understanding of the dynamic.

So then we're going to get a batman cameo in the Suicide Squad movie, unless all they do is show the batmobile chase scene they just filmed.

No one knows for sure at this point though I'm sure we'll see him.

No one knows for sure at this point though I'm sure we'll see him.

 

It'd be interesting if they borrowed from the animated suicide squad movie for story ideas, that had batman showing up at different parts.

It'd be interesting if they borrowed from the animated suicide squad movie for story ideas, that had batman showing up at different parts.

As it turns out, he'll be showing up on the roof of Joker's car ;)

CGAD1Y4W8AA73tr.jpg

Source + video: ComicBooMovie.com

  • 2 weeks later...

Does his suit in some way help him against Superman whom is 1000x stronger in some form? I guess I just don't understand how its possible he can even contend.

People seem to not realize in the DC world batman is super rich, the best detective, and the greatest all out fighter in the DC universe. Also all he has to do is have a piece of kyptonite on him and its over.

  • Like 1

Batman? Outfit covers the entire body. Superman? Outfit covers the entire body? Wonder Woman? Barely covers anything. Sexism is alive and kicking.

Are you joking? Most women in the temperate portions of the world expose more skin area than that almost year around. Hell, in summer short shorts and a crop (or bikini) top are almost a friggin' uniform among teens and twenty-somethings.

  • Like 2

Are you joking? Most women in the temperate portions of the world expose more skin area than that almost year around. Hell, in summer short shorts and a crop (or bikini) top are almost a friggin' uniform among teens and twenty-somethings.

Are you really comparing summer attire to superhero costumes? Even if you are, men often go around topless in summer and it doesn't account for the disparity.

 

What we're talking about here is men being depicted as strong and women being depicted as sexual objects. These are tired gender stereotypes. It's the same with Suicide Squad, with the men dressed in thick, bulky clothing and the women with bare skin and tight clothing. Hard to believe it's the 21st century.

Are you really comparing summer attire to superhero costumes? Even if you are, men often go around topless in summer and it doesn't account for the disparity.

 

What we're talking about here is men being depicted as strong and women being depicted as sexual objects. These are tired gender stereotypes. It's the same with Suicide Squad, with the men dressed in thick, bulky clothing and the women with bare skin and tight clothing. I believe it's the 21st century.

 I've been around America (North, Central and South) and  "macho" mentality is here to say, sadly. That said, imagine wonder women was in spandex ala catoman, people would always find a way to complain. eg "why is she wearing spandex and batman leather" etc...

>

What we're talking about here is men being depicted as strong and women being depicted as sexual objects. These are tired gender stereotypes. It's the same with Suicide Squad, with the men dressed in thick, bulky clothing and the women with bare skin and tight clothing. Hard to believe it's the 21st century.

Have you been hiding under a rock for 45 years? WW's been a women's liberation icon/hero since the 1970's, and when her costume has changed to (usually cover more) they're usually the loudest protestors. Out of touch much?

Harley Quinn is dressed in short shorts, with leg covering hose, but still common and her top is no smaller than what we see every day in a northern climate (Michigan, Canada etc.) much less places further South or in the West, and in New York City and several other locales its legal for women to go topless - which they do. As we speak women are lobbying the Venice Beach, Cal. govt for the right to go nude on the beach.

Grow up.

Have you been hiding under a rock for 45 years? WW's been a women's liberation icon/hero since the 1970's, and when her costume has changed to (usually cover more) they're usually the loudest protestors. Out of touch much?

That might have been deemed progressive back in the 70s but it doesn't wash today. 

 

Harley Quinn is dressed in short shorts, with leg covering hose, but still common and her top is no smaller than what we see every day in a northern climate (Michigan, Canada etc.) much less places further South or in the West, and in New York City and several other locales its legal for women to go topless - which they do. As we speak women are lobbying the Venice Beach, Cal. govt for the right to go nude on the beach.

You're missing the point, which is that it is sexualised in comparison to the male characters. The men wear armour and bulky clothes - the women wear skimpy clothes. This is a classic example of how women are objectified for commercial gain.

In real life men wear more than women do, duh. Goes back to men being the traditional warriors and wearing body protection. Further, stats show the closer women are to ovulation the more skin they expose or the redder the colors are they wear - again not news. In WW's case the libbers uniform preference still holds. They see her as empowering.

And again, the WW costume mainly exposes her arms and mid-thighs, with boots covering the rest of her legs. Women expose far more skin area in their daily clothes.

People should take context into account, let's not try to make this out to be sexist when it's not.  WW background, an amazon/greek warrior dictates the type of outfit she uses.  All you have to do is look at other films like 300 etc to get the picture, and for that matter I don't see anyone looking at that movie, with all the scantly clad guys and screaming it's sexist, what's with the double standard here? 

 

Her outfit doesn't show much, the original one from the old TV series showed more, this one is basically an armored skirt with knee high armored boots, you see a bit of leg, not much, and her arms and shoulders are out, nothing big, there isn't even any cleavage.   At the most you could probably make the skirt a bit longer but nothing else needs to change.  Long story short, it fits her character and the history of her character the way it is designed.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!