Recommended Posts

1. Go to Google Maps and enter your home address.

2. Your address will appear on the map. Underneath the search bar, click the Street View box. Or you can grab the little Pegman on the bottom-right corner of the screen and place him wherever you?d like.

3. Once you?ve adjusted your view so you can see the front of your home, click Report a problem at the very bottom right of the page.

4. You?ll be brought to a page that displays your address and the image of your home. Adjust the red box to make sure it?s focused on the thing you want blurred out. It can be your face, your license plate, your home, or anything else (you, naked, doing backflips in your front yard). Indicate what you?d like to eliminate by filling out the form under Request blurring.You can also report poor image quality.

more

  • Like 4

It can be your face, your license plate, your home, or anything else (you, naked, doing backflips in your front yard).

I wonder if I can use "Report a Problem" to have me naked doing backflips in my yard added to Google Maps. I missed their drive-by and feeling a little left out.

 You mean the very same, random people that can find your blurred house on a map, yet drive to your house and see it in person?

 

Sounds like one of those gun control arguments.

 

Person A: Ban guns. / Ban Google Maps street view

Person B: People will use knives. / People will use a map and drive to your house.

Person A: Not as easy to kill with knives. / Not as convenient to look at their house by driving there.

Sounds like one of those gun control arguments.

 

Person A: Ban guns. / Ban Google Maps street view

Person B: People will use knives. / People will use a map and drive to your house.

Person A: Not as easy to kill with knives. / Not as convenient to look at their house by driving there.

No, just one of those common sense arguments.  People freak over the most idiotic stuff.  People actually worry about someone looking at a static, 1+ year old photo of their house?  

 

Go ahead and blur your house.  But think of this...if someone is unstable enough to randomly spy on houses using street view, which house do you think would stand out like a sore thumb asking this unstable person to pay a visit?  A clear image, like millions of others with nothing to hide, or one particular house, deliberately blurred?

No, just one of those common sense arguments.  People freak over the most idiotic stuff.  People actually worry about someone looking at a static, 1+ year old photo of their house?  

 

Go ahead and blur your house.  But think of this...if someone is unstable enough to randomly spy on houses using street view, which house do you think would stand out like a sore thumb asking this unstable person to pay a visit?  A clear image, like millions of others with nothing to hide, or one particular house, deliberately blurred?

 

Excuse me but Google's picture of my house is 6 years old. They need to get with it.

 

Also I don't blur my house.

It would be nice if they announced when the Google car was coming around next time so I could prop up some fake trees to block their view.

 

i 100% guarantee with great certainty, no stranger cares to see "your" house as well as anyone else who cares. Ask anyone here. Ask anyone you know. 

^ Apparently you don't believe there is any such thing as stalking, kidnapping, murder, that goes on.

 

 

There is a big difference between someone driving by your house randomly and seeing it, and photographing your home and putting it on the Internet for possibly millions to see, and some stranger locating you.

 

Relatively few are going to drive by your house, and probably are not going to know who lives there.

 

Having your license plate on the Internet, could allow thousands of strangers know how to find you.

 

Google should be required to get permission first, before posting photographs of your home.

 

Which would be a near impossibility, which would render Street View useless.

 

Probably a good thing. ;)

^ Apparently you don't believe there is any such thing as stalking, kidnapping, murder, that goes on.

 

 

There is a big difference between someone driving by your house randomly and seeing it, and photographing your home and putting it on the Internet for possibly millions to see, and some stranger locating you.

 

Relatively few are going to drive by your house, and probably are not going to know who lives there.

 

Having your license plate on the Internet, could allow thousands of strangers know how to find you.

 

Google should be required to get permission first, before posting photographs of your home.

 

Which would be a near impossibility, which would render Street View useless.

 

Probably a good thing. ;)

 

anyone can go to your street regardless of having prior info on it. 

 

side note: do people that show up on your surveillance videos you have posted that on your house have a say to be able to remove themselves from your surveillance videos? I am meaning the cars that pass by and the pedestrians that walk by. Do you have their permission?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!