4G LTE Now available on Verzion Prepay : $107 post pay now $65 Prepay


Recommended Posts

*Unconfirmed Confirmed* 4G LTE reportedly arriving at Verizon prepaid on July 17

In a development that's definitely been a very long time coming, Verizon may finally bring 4G LTE connectivity to its prepaid plans.
This could happen on July 17, according to certain unnamed sources. On that date, Verizon's Allset prepaid plan should gain 4G LTE access.

This plan offers you unlimited talk and text and 500MB of data for $45 per month. That paltry data allowance can be topped up with a few add-on options, which go all the way up to 3GB for $20. Add to that a further 500MB which you can get just by signing up for auto-pay, and so you could conceivably have 4GB of 4G data each month for $65 (along with the unlimited voice and text communications, of course).

You're obviously the one who'll be the judge of whether this is a good deal or not. Do keep in mind though that it's still not known if Big Red will give handsets on prepaid plans access to its full 4G speeds or if it will throttle them in some way.

Once the new 4G-capable plan goes live on July 17, you'll be able to sign up for it through Verizon's website, and all other channels (including by calling customer service).


http://www.gsmarena.com/4g_support_reportedly_coming_to_verizon_prepaid_on_july_17-news-8946.php

I have used Verizon Prepay in the past and I found it to be a fantastic bargain. The only reason I didn't stick with it because I wanted a decent phone (Only decent phones were 4G). At the time the Moto G was not available. Had the phone been available then, I probably would have never left prepaid.

I then upgraded to a Samsung S3 where i'm still at today via a custom 4.4.4 CM rom. (No issues at all). It would be nice if come July 17th I could bring it back on prepaid.

On prepaid I was paying around $65 - $70. On Post paid i'm paying around $107.

Edited by Roger H.
  • 2 weeks later...

Signed up for it yesterday. It was funny because they must have a bunch of sections in the prepaid department, but in this particular department I was their first 4GB sign up.

 

I heard the supervisor who was on the call with the guy tell some female in the back "We are doing our first 4G prepaid signup" ...I feel special

 

 

The phone i'm using on the service is the Galaxy S3 4G phone

 

What I'm now getting for $65 a month I was previously paying $107

 

When you autopay you get an additional 1GB of data

 

$45 a month

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

500MB of Data, ...1.5GB (with autopay)

 

 

$50 a month

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

1GB of data, ...2GB (with autopay)

 

$55 a month

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

1.5GB of data, ...2.5GB (with autopay)

 

$65 a month.

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

3GB of data, ...4GB (with autopay)

I thought it was 500MB of free data when you autopay?

 

OH well, congrats... that's a nice chunk of change back in your pocket. (Y)

 

Thanks I guess the only people who wouldn't go that route, are people who get enticed by the 2 year contract subsidy price on new phones. The people who would go that route are the ones already out of contract or the ones who buy used phones on eBay. Then again there are those who buy phones for their $500+ price tag and bring them on out of contract.

 

Up until Yesterday, the phone selection for prepaid SUCKED! Because you couldn't bring on an LTE 4G Phone (which was practically any good phone). The best phone / the one with the most ram / until the Moto G you could get / put on Verizon Prepaid was the HTC Incredible 2 which had 768 of ram. All other devices had  512meg or less of ram and usually stick on Gingerbread.

 

There was another prepaid only phone on verizon that had 768 of ram but it was pink.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

The issue (for VZW) is network standardization.  Right now, VZW is basically running two networks - CDMA sans LTE for the low end (and their MVNO operations, such as TotalCall Mobile), and LTE/XLTE for everyone above that.

 

Running two networks is not cheap.

 

However, the problem is that LTE/XLTE is data-driven - not voice-driven; that is regardless of provider.  VoLTE has next to zero takeup in handsets (anywhere - it's not a US-only problem); instead, the demanded feature (even in phablets) is VoIP - which is still too pricey for popular data plans - even, if not especially, at LTE/XLTE speeds.  That means you still have to make phone-calls - and thus you still need CDMA for that.

 

Another result is multi-device - for phone calls, you have the MVNOs, while the data side is fought among the traditional providers (including VZW).

On prepaid I was paying around $65 - $70. On Post paid i'm paying around $107.

The ######? $107?

My wife and I are on AT&T (which is just as bad as verizon) and we have unlimited text, unlimited calls, and 3gb of data each for $120 a month for the both of us. Why the hell are you paying $107 just for yourself?

The ######? $107?

My wife and I are on AT&T (which is just as bad as verizon) and we have unlimited text, unlimited calls, and 3gb of data each for $120 a month for the both of us. Why the hell are you paying $107 just for yourself?

 

Oh well, not paying that now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!