4G LTE Now available on Verzion Prepay : $107 post pay now $65 Prepay


Recommended Posts

*Unconfirmed Confirmed* 4G LTE reportedly arriving at Verizon prepaid on July 17

In a development that's definitely been a very long time coming, Verizon may finally bring 4G LTE connectivity to its prepaid plans.
This could happen on July 17, according to certain unnamed sources. On that date, Verizon's Allset prepaid plan should gain 4G LTE access.

This plan offers you unlimited talk and text and 500MB of data for $45 per month. That paltry data allowance can be topped up with a few add-on options, which go all the way up to 3GB for $20. Add to that a further 500MB which you can get just by signing up for auto-pay, and so you could conceivably have 4GB of 4G data each month for $65 (along with the unlimited voice and text communications, of course).

You're obviously the one who'll be the judge of whether this is a good deal or not. Do keep in mind though that it's still not known if Big Red will give handsets on prepaid plans access to its full 4G speeds or if it will throttle them in some way.

Once the new 4G-capable plan goes live on July 17, you'll be able to sign up for it through Verizon's website, and all other channels (including by calling customer service).


http://www.gsmarena.com/4g_support_reportedly_coming_to_verizon_prepaid_on_july_17-news-8946.php

I have used Verizon Prepay in the past and I found it to be a fantastic bargain. The only reason I didn't stick with it because I wanted a decent phone (Only decent phones were 4G). At the time the Moto G was not available. Had the phone been available then, I probably would have never left prepaid.

I then upgraded to a Samsung S3 where i'm still at today via a custom 4.4.4 CM rom. (No issues at all). It would be nice if come July 17th I could bring it back on prepaid.

On prepaid I was paying around $65 - $70. On Post paid i'm paying around $107.

Edited by Roger H.
  • 2 weeks later...

Signed up for it yesterday. It was funny because they must have a bunch of sections in the prepaid department, but in this particular department I was their first 4GB sign up.

 

I heard the supervisor who was on the call with the guy tell some female in the back "We are doing our first 4G prepaid signup" ...I feel special

 

 

The phone i'm using on the service is the Galaxy S3 4G phone

 

What I'm now getting for $65 a month I was previously paying $107

 

When you autopay you get an additional 1GB of data

 

$45 a month

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

500MB of Data, ...1.5GB (with autopay)

 

 

$50 a month

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

1GB of data, ...2GB (with autopay)

 

$55 a month

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

1.5GB of data, ...2.5GB (with autopay)

 

$65 a month.

 

Unlimited Talk

Unlimited Text and photo

3GB of data, ...4GB (with autopay)

I thought it was 500MB of free data when you autopay?

 

OH well, congrats... that's a nice chunk of change back in your pocket. (Y)

 

Thanks I guess the only people who wouldn't go that route, are people who get enticed by the 2 year contract subsidy price on new phones. The people who would go that route are the ones already out of contract or the ones who buy used phones on eBay. Then again there are those who buy phones for their $500+ price tag and bring them on out of contract.

 

Up until Yesterday, the phone selection for prepaid SUCKED! Because you couldn't bring on an LTE 4G Phone (which was practically any good phone). The best phone / the one with the most ram / until the Moto G you could get / put on Verizon Prepaid was the HTC Incredible 2 which had 768 of ram. All other devices had  512meg or less of ram and usually stick on Gingerbread.

 

There was another prepaid only phone on verizon that had 768 of ram but it was pink.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

The issue (for VZW) is network standardization.  Right now, VZW is basically running two networks - CDMA sans LTE for the low end (and their MVNO operations, such as TotalCall Mobile), and LTE/XLTE for everyone above that.

 

Running two networks is not cheap.

 

However, the problem is that LTE/XLTE is data-driven - not voice-driven; that is regardless of provider.  VoLTE has next to zero takeup in handsets (anywhere - it's not a US-only problem); instead, the demanded feature (even in phablets) is VoIP - which is still too pricey for popular data plans - even, if not especially, at LTE/XLTE speeds.  That means you still have to make phone-calls - and thus you still need CDMA for that.

 

Another result is multi-device - for phone calls, you have the MVNOs, while the data side is fought among the traditional providers (including VZW).

On prepaid I was paying around $65 - $70. On Post paid i'm paying around $107.

The ######? $107?

My wife and I are on AT&T (which is just as bad as verizon) and we have unlimited text, unlimited calls, and 3gb of data each for $120 a month for the both of us. Why the hell are you paying $107 just for yourself?

The ######? $107?

My wife and I are on AT&T (which is just as bad as verizon) and we have unlimited text, unlimited calls, and 3gb of data each for $120 a month for the both of us. Why the hell are you paying $107 just for yourself?

 

Oh well, not paying that now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!