Recommended Posts

U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Jesus Jimenez fought two separate battles over the last seven years. He served one year in the Middle East as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and, while he was stationed overseas, he also fought Miami-Dade County in Florida to keep his home.

Jimenez, 37, did not win the war back home.

In 2011, while training for an upcoming deployment in California, his family home was torn down after county officials rejected a plea to delay demolition over home code violations.

Jimenez?s wife, kids, hearing-impaired brother and mother-in-law were able to get some personal items out before the 1947 house was razed.

?I didn?t think they would go and demolish it,? Jimenez told Fox News Latino from El Paso, Texas where he is currently stationed. ?When the house came down, (the county) didn?t have a court order. It was spur-of-the-moment.?

The Jimenez family?s troubles with Miami-Dade County began in May 2007 when an inspector determined there were code violations in the house. Among the problems with the home that sparked the initial code citation were deteriorating porch beams, a deteriorated roof, a damaged door and an uncovered electrical junction box.

?I took down the list of things to do and asked if I would need permits for anything. (The inspector) said no,? Jimenez told FNL.

The soldier said he was getting ready to do the work, but more citations were issued against the home that made repair work unreasonable ? especially since he was in the middle of preparing for a deployment.

?Everything they asked for was undoable,? Jimenez said. ?It was bringing the house up to modern-day code or it will be demolished.?

Eventually the family hired an engineer to complete the work, but county officials said the problems were so extensive that it would be better to start from scratch.

?The intention was to demolish it anyways,? Jimenez said.

He accused county officials have making it a personal attack rather than being concerned about the actual safety of the house.

more

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1223525-soldier/
Share on other sites

i thought if you serve you get a house/flat anyway?

but if its his house and ground he should be allowed to do and keep or destroy whatever he wants and state and government should keep out of private area. i mean is this usa or sowjet union? :/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1223525-soldier/#findComment-596510315
Share on other sites

i thought if you serve you get a house/flat anyway?

but if its his house and ground he should be allowed to do and keep or destroy whatever he wants and state and government should keep out of private area. i mean is this usa or sowjet union? :/

 

There are plenty of good reasons to have and enforce building codes. Not saying this guy didn't get the shaft, but you don't get to do whatever you want for good reason.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1223525-soldier/#findComment-596510389
Share on other sites

There are plenty of good reasons to have and enforce building codes. Not saying this guy didn't get the shaft, but you don't get to do whatever you want for good reason.

well it sounds like this county was hell bent on "getting him" good. read the part where he wrote down the violations only to have a whole new list that mad it impossible to repair. what a mess.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1223525-soldier/#findComment-596510395
Share on other sites

Ain't life a "Bitch."  Just because your a service member (solider) it doen't give you any more rights then a private citizen.   The news uses the term soldier to hopefully make it seem more hindous. (sorry if that is misspelled having had two strokes has caused  me memory problem. . . :woot:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1223525-soldier/#findComment-596510541
Share on other sites

I thought that a lot of the time, old houses are just grandfathered in with the code violations. It only becomes an issue if he wants to sell / rent out the house.

Otherwise it would ridiculous and people would have to hire an inspector and contractor every year just to keep up with the changes.

Maybe his code violations were too severe and could potentially affect neighboring houses?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1223525-soldier/#findComment-596510697
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 27 is out.
    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      445
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!